Bressen wrote:Alvecia wrote:I can actually. To exist, something must have a measureable effect on existence. If it does not, it does not exist, definitionally. Here we're drawing the boundary around existence, and God and other such concepts still cannot be found. We must therefore consider this absense of evidence to be evidence of absense.
Why does the effect have to be measurable?
Because if it is not, what is the practical difference between it existing or not existing ?