Man I haven't had Popeye's in a while now...
Damn you for bringing up good food.
Advertisement
by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Mar 26, 2017 10:42 am
by Soyouso » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:01 am
American Imperial Realm wrote:The U.S. Congress is a bastard organization full of corrupt fools owned by massive corporations. Too beholden to serve the people.
Congress has the lowest approval rating in history. 19%
Let's not get emotional about 200 year old pieces of paper and institutions long since evolved and changed.
It's time to get rid of Congress and empower the executive to fulfill the direct will of the People.
no more petty bureaucracy. It's time to empower the leader and reorganize.
Politics is too inefficient.
by Great Minarchistan » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:01 am
by Ifreann » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:06 am
Arethra wrote:We shouldn't get rid of Congress, we should reform Congress. There are currently no term limits for Senators or Congressmen, and most of them don't even represent their constituents.
by Great Minarchistan » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:07 am
Soyouso wrote:American Imperial Realm wrote:The U.S. Congress is a bastard organization full of corrupt fools owned by massive corporations. Too beholden to serve the people.
Congress has the lowest approval rating in history. 19%
Let's not get emotional about 200 year old pieces of paper and institutions long since evolved and changed.
It's time to get rid of Congress and empower the executive to fulfill the direct will of the People.
no more petty bureaucracy. It's time to empower the leader and reorganize.
Politics is too inefficient.
As a fascist I'd say yes. I dream my country will eventually realize how inefficient it's system is. We have to stop making politics a popularity contest and just get down to business. My people deserve better. But of course there's the consitution being against it, so it won't happen.
by Neanderthaland » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:09 am
by Soyouso » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:13 am
Great Minarchistan wrote:Soyouso wrote:As a fascist I'd say yes. I dream my country will eventually realize how inefficient it's system is. We have to stop making politics a popularity contest and just get down to business. My people deserve better. But of course there's the consitution being against it, so it won't happen.
Libertarianism knows how to get things done tho, specially ancapists.
Disclaimer: The ancapist was merely a joke, please dont ban me
by USS Monitor » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:24 am
by Neanderthaland » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:25 am
by Ifreann » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:32 am
by A Humanist Resurrection » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:37 am
USS Monitor wrote:He could at least get some GOOD fast food like Popeye's or something.
by Neanderthaland » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:40 am
Ifreann wrote:Neanderthaland wrote:Would you care to explain why you think so?
Because it allows people to keep their representatives if that's what they want. And if their representative wants to keep standing for election. What good does it actually do anyone to only allow two terms(and for some reason it's always two terms)? If their constituents are happy enough to re-elect them, if they haven't broken the law in such a way as would disqualify them from office, why not let them be elected again? And if they aren't representing their constituents well, there's a well established mechanism for replacing them with someone else.
by Ifreann » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:42 am
Neanderthaland wrote:Ifreann wrote:Because it allows people to keep their representatives if that's what they want. And if their representative wants to keep standing for election. What good does it actually do anyone to only allow two terms(and for some reason it's always two terms)? If their constituents are happy enough to re-elect them, if they haven't broken the law in such a way as would disqualify them from office, why not let them be elected again? And if they aren't representing their constituents well, there's a well established mechanism for replacing them with someone else.
For the sake of argument though, a lot of people of attention to (especially) house appointments, they just check off next to the R or the D. In some districts a house appointment is essentially a lifetime appointment. So long as they don't get caught doing anything too obscene. Is that okay?
by A Humanist Resurrection » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:43 am
Ifreann wrote:Because it allows people to keep their representatives if that's what they want. And if their representative wants to keep standing for election. What good does it actually do anyone to only allow two terms(and for some reason it's always two terms)? If their constituents are happy enough to re-elect them, if they haven't broken the law in such a way as would disqualify them from office, why not let them be elected again? And if they aren't representing their constituents well, there's a well established mechanism for replacing them with someone else.
by Crylante » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:51 am
by USS Monitor » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:56 am
A Humanist Resurrection wrote:USS Monitor wrote:He could at least get some GOOD fast food like Popeye's or something.
I'm probably really fortunate to live in a suitably urban area, but most of my fast fooding recently has been at small cafes owned and operated by some of America's very rapidly growing Chinese and Japanese immigrant population.
Many such cafes and small eateries are inexpensive and fast, relatively healthy (vegetables are a main dish ), and of course there's the opportunity to contribute to the further corruption of the glorious white race built right in.
Why give my money to a faceless fast-food corporation headquartered hundres of miles away, when I could give it to a hard-working local immigrant small business instead?
by A Humanist Resurrection » Sun Mar 26, 2017 11:58 am
USS Monitor wrote:A Humanist Resurrection wrote:
I'm probably really fortunate to live in a suitably urban area, but most of my fast fooding recently has been at small cafes owned and operated by some of America's very rapidly growing Chinese and Japanese immigrant population.
Many such cafes and small eateries are inexpensive and fast, relatively healthy (vegetables are a main dish ), and of course there's the opportunity to contribute to the further corruption of the glorious white race built right in.
Why give my money to a faceless fast-food corporation headquartered hundres of miles away, when I could give it to a hard-working local immigrant small business instead?
I like Asian food too, but Popeye's has really tasty food and not everything has to be an ethical decision about who you are supporting financially. Sometimes you just want fried chicken.
by USS Monitor » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:08 pm
A Humanist Resurrection wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
I like Asian food too, but Popeye's has really tasty food and not everything has to be an ethical decision about who you are supporting financially. Sometimes you just want fried chicken.
Some times ya just wanna see if OP's apparent anti-corporatism will extend in certain directions, too.
by Arcturus Novus » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:11 pm
Nilokeras wrote:there is of course an interesting thread to pull on [...]
Unfortunately we're all forced to participate in whatever baroque humiliation kink the OP has going on instead.
by Philjia » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:12 pm
Nemesis the Warlock wrote:I am the Nemesis, I am the Warlock, I am the shape of things to come, the Lord of the Flies, holder of the Sword Sinister, the Death Bringer, I am the one who waits on the edge of your dreams, I am all these things and many more
by A Humanist Resurrection » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:19 pm
USS Monitor wrote:As long as you stop short of actually trolling, carry on.
by Ifreann » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:20 pm
A Humanist Resurrection wrote:Ifreann wrote:Because it allows people to keep their representatives if that's what they want. And if their representative wants to keep standing for election. What good does it actually do anyone to only allow two terms(and for some reason it's always two terms)? If their constituents are happy enough to re-elect them, if they haven't broken the law in such a way as would disqualify them from office, why not let them be elected again? And if they aren't representing their constituents well, there's a well established mechanism for replacing them with someone else.
I'd add that my subjective impression is that term limits really only become a popular idea when some interest loses an important vote they thought they had in the bag. Thus, where the "people" refuse to cooperate, the will of the people obviously must be diluted a bit...
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 26, 2017 12:30 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alexiandra, Bovad, Elejamie, Eshtrushe, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Juristonia, Khardsland, Omphalos, Ors Might, Plan Neonie, USHALLNOTPASS, Vassenor, Zancostan
Advertisement