NationStates

Ifreann wrote:

Empire of Cats wrote:
Somehow Obama will be blamed for this...

Well before founding ISIS, Obama facilitated African slavery in the Americas in his role as Emperor of Mali, so really it is all his fault.

Now we just need to say this on r/the_donald and El Presidente himself will be tweeting it by tomorrow.

Strange...I heard he was the Caliph of ISIS, not the Emperor of Mali, and that he approved Pearl Harbor and 9/11, as well a step Bowling Green Massacre, in which a total of 0 people died. Tragic. I got my sources from Bretitbart; so I KNOW they're right. Where'd you get yours? Clinton News Network?

Forcing people to pay for others healthcare is a very controversial topic, of course people would dislike Obama for such a thing.

Ifreann wrote:

Empire of Cats wrote:
Somehow Obama will be blamed for this...

Well before founding ISIS, Obama facilitated African slavery in the Americas in his role as Emperor of Mali, so really it is all his fault.

Now we just need to say this on r/the_donald and El Presidente himself will be tweeting it by tomorrow.

Created a throwaway account and posted it.
We'll see. Might get lost in the churn.

Supreme Chancellor Trump wrote:Forcing people to pay for others healthcare is a very controversial topic, of course people would dislike Obama for such a thing.

But now the Republicans are going to force people to pay for other people's healthcare, but it'll be okay this time, because reasons.

Supreme Chancellor Trump wrote:Forcing people to pay for others healthcare is a very controversial topic, of course people would dislike Obama for such a thing.

yes many people are opposed to letting groups they don't like have access to healthcare.

normal people see that it is a great boon for everyone in the country.

Ifreann wrote:

Supreme Chancellor Trump wrote:Forcing people to pay for others healthcare is a very controversial topic, of course people would dislike Obama for such a thing.

But now the Republicans are going to force people to pay for other people's healthcare, but it'll be okay this time, because reasons.

because the tax subsidies will be so inadequate that people they don't like still wont be able to afford insurance.

Aro Ice Cream wrote:
He has the nuclear codes, though.

He alone cannot decide to start or even act in nuclear warfare. You're acting as if there's this big bomb button on his desk, and all it takes is a little hissy fit for him to smash it.

Empire of Cats wrote:...as well a step Bowling Green Massacre, in which a total of 0 people died. Tragic.

Just to address this, that was misspoken. What she meant to say was Bowling Green Terrorists, which was very real and threatened lives, that she clarified after the interview.

AsReil wrote:

Empire of Cats wrote:...as well a step Bowling Green Massacre, in which a total of 0 people died. Tragic.

Just to address this, that was misspoken. What she meant to say was Bowling Green Terrorists, which was very real and threatened lives, that she clarified after the interview.

Your link is broken.

AsReil wrote:

Empire of Cats wrote:...as well a step Bowling Green Massacre, in which a total of 0 people died. Tragic.

Just to address this, that was misspoken. What she meant to say was Bowling Green Terrorists, which was very real and threatened lives, that she clarified after the interview.

you are so gullible.

she used it SEVERAL times. she only made up that story after someone confronted her with it.

Ashmoria wrote:

Ifreann wrote:But now the Republicans are going to force people to pay for other people's healthcare, but it'll be okay this time, because reasons.

because the tax subsidies will be so inadequate that people they don't like still wont be able to afford insurance.

Eh, for the poor sure.

For middle class they'll be larger. However, the problem is that if you leave in the preexisting condition clauses but remove the mandate, you'll either collapse the private insurance market entirely (likely) or drive premiums so sky high almost no one can afford them (which is almost the same thing).

Imagine if you weren't required to carry car insurance but you could buy insurance and they had to fix the car you already crashed and pay for damage you already did before the policy began.

That.

Galloism wrote:

Ashmoria wrote:because the tax subsidies will be so inadequate that people they don't like still wont be able to afford insurance.

Eh, for the poor sure.

For middle class they'll be larger. However, the problem is that if you leave in the preexisting condition clauses but remove the mandate, you'll either collapse the private insurance market entirely (likely) or drive premiums so sky high almost no one can afford them (which is almost the same thing).

Imagine if you weren't required to carry car insurance but you could buy insurance and they had to fix the car you already crashed and pay for damage you already did before the policy began.

That.

the genius of the ACA was giving people just the right amount of subsidy. one size fits all is stupid.

does this bill require that everyone be charged the same? it looked to me like people with pre-existing conditions had to be OFFERED insurance but that that price will not be regulated.

Ashmoria wrote:

Galloism wrote:Eh, for the poor sure.

For middle class they'll be larger. However, the problem is that if you leave in the preexisting condition clauses but remove the mandate, you'll either collapse the private insurance market entirely (likely) or drive premiums so sky high almost no one can afford them (which is almost the same thing).

Imagine if you weren't required to carry car insurance but you could buy insurance and they had to fix the car you already crashed and pay for damage you already did before the policy began.

That.

the genius of the ACA was giving people just the right amount of subsidy. one size fits all is stupid.

does this bill require that everyone be charged the same? it looked to me like people with pre-existing conditions had to be OFFERED insurance but that that price will not be regulated.

Keeping the choice bits and calling it Trumpcare, as predicted.

So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

Ashmoria wrote:

Galloism wrote:Eh, for the poor sure.

For middle class they'll be larger. However, the problem is that if you leave in the preexisting condition clauses but remove the mandate, you'll either collapse the private insurance market entirely (likely) or drive premiums so sky high almost no one can afford them (which is almost the same thing).

Imagine if you weren't required to carry car insurance but you could buy insurance and they had to fix the car you already crashed and pay for damage you already did before the policy began.

That.

the genius of the ACA was giving people just the right amount of subsidy. one size fits all is stupid.

does this bill require that everyone be charged the same? it looked to me like people with pre-existing conditions had to be OFFERED insurance but that that price will not be regulated.

No, the price will not be regulated. It will be illegal to refuse people based on pre-existing conditions, but you can charge them a lot. Not an objectively prohibitive amount, but still a lot. As in, they're better off paying it out of their own pocket, probably, especially since they will have to carry their own weight: without mandatory insurance, healthy people will not support unhealthy ones.

Internationalist Bastard wrote:So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

Ah, the POTUS Triple.

Internationalist Bastard wrote:So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

Republicans were doing that for pretty much all of Obama's administration.

Internationalist Bastard wrote:So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

Which thing Bush did?

Ifreann wrote:

Internationalist Bastard wrote:So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

Which thing Bush did?

I think 123 or some similer number Gitmo detainees rejoined fighting, but 111 were released by bush

Ifreann wrote:

Internationalist Bastard wrote:So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

Which thing Bush did?

Cocaine

Frank Zipper wrote:

Ifreann wrote:Which thing Bush did?

Cocaine

Obama did cocaine?!

Alvecia wrote:

Frank Zipper wrote:
Cocaine

Obama did cocaine?!

Like a baller.

I feel every time he violently lashes out at a rumor on twitter, its a sign that theirs truth to it.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta ... 1956640768

Alvecia wrote:

Frank Zipper wrote:
Cocaine

Obama did cocaine?!

Come on, reading comprehension please!

Internationalist Bastard wrote:So today, Trump blames Obama for something Bush did

why didn't you say what youre talking about?