Well at least that makes sense. Baaa!
Advertisement
by AiliailiA » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:08 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Pasong Tirad » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:44 pm
by Aromanticism » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:53 pm
New haven america wrote:MAGAThread VI: Saga of The American Czar
MAGAThread VI: But What About her Emails?
MAGAThread VI: Breaking One Promise After Another
MAGAThread VI: No Seriously, What About her Emails?
by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Apr 30, 2017 11:59 pm
Pasong Tirad wrote:If Duterte enters the White House, a president will basically be welcoming a self-styled murderer.
by Neutraligon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:09 am
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:12 am
Neutraligon wrote:Seems that a deal to keep the gov running till Sept is likely to pass. There is no money for a wall. While there is an increase that Repubs asked for border security there is a stipulation on what the money can be spent on (namely it cannot be spent on a new wall, only technology and repairing existing infrastructure). There is also apparently an increase in funding for science and PP still gets funding.
by Dahon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:20 am
Neutraligon wrote:Seems that a deal to keep the gov running till Sept is likely to pass. There is no money for a wall. While there is an increase that Repubs asked for border security there is a stipulation on what the money can be spent on (namely it cannot be spent on a new wall, only technology and repairing existing infrastructure). There is also apparently an increase in funding for science and PP still gets funding.
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:24 am
Dahon wrote:Neutraligon wrote:Seems that a deal to keep the gov running till Sept is likely to pass. There is no money for a wall. While there is an increase that Repubs asked for border security there is a stipulation on what the money can be spent on (namely it cannot be spent on a new wall, only technology and repairing existing infrastructure). There is also apparently an increase in funding for science and PP still gets funding.
In other words... Trump got trumped?
by Dahon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:26 am
Aromanticism wrote:Do not become complacent. Our duties are nowhere near finished.
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:27 am
by Dahon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:29 am
Dahon wrote:"Trump MAGAThread Six: Puer Magi Dahoni Magica -- Atonement"
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:31 am
by Neutraligon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:32 am
Dahon wrote:Neutraligon wrote:Seems that a deal to keep the gov running till Sept is likely to pass. There is no money for a wall. While there is an increase that Repubs asked for border security there is a stipulation on what the money can be spent on (namely it cannot be spent on a new wall, only technology and repairing existing infrastructure). There is also apparently an increase in funding for science and PP still gets funding.
In other words... Trump got trumped?
by Great Nepal » Mon May 01, 2017 12:41 am
New haven america wrote:MAGAThread VI: Saga of The American Czar
MAGAThread VI: But What About her Emails?
MAGAThread VI: Breaking One Promise After Another
MAGAThread VI: No Seriously, What About her Emails?
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:43 am
by Dahon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:45 am
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:51 am
by Pasong Tirad » Mon May 01, 2017 12:52 am
by Dahon » Mon May 01, 2017 12:54 am
by Aromanticism » Mon May 01, 2017 12:56 am
by Gallia- » Mon May 01, 2017 3:35 am
New haven america wrote:Gallia- wrote:
A Millennial riot doesn't even register on the radar in Reagan's time. For that matter, neither does voter turnout. Or crime rates. Millenials are apathetic both politically and criminally, yet they think that the world is falling apart. It's quite amusing to see the stark contrast between reality and Millennial perceptions.
Imagine if Millennials were old enough to have opinions in 1992, 1967, or 1862, where the riots weren't just glorified sports hooligans.
*Cough*
One of those was worldwide, btw.
by Vassenor » Mon May 01, 2017 3:39 am
Gallia- wrote:
Yet it's still smaller than the Iraq War protests in 2003.
Just like Trump's inauguration parades, the protests against him were "low energy".
by Pasong Tirad » Mon May 01, 2017 3:43 am
Vassenor wrote:Gallia- wrote:
Yet it's still smaller than the Iraq War protests in 2003.
Just like Trump's inauguration parades, the protests against him were "low energy".
I'm not sure I understand your point.
by Vassenor » Mon May 01, 2017 3:45 am
by Pasong Tirad » Mon May 01, 2017 3:49 am
Vassenor wrote:Pasong Tirad wrote:Undermining millennials for not being violent enough? Not making enough of an impact? Pfft, hell if I know.
At the moment it seems to be "these protests are invalid because these protests a decade before against something completely different were bigger" or something.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Australian rePublic, Dimetrodon Empire, Grinning Dragon, Kenmoria, Nu Elysium, Sweeze, Tarsonis, The Apollonian Systems, The Lone Alliance, Valentine Z
Advertisement