Yeah another instance of Merkel changing her views. Evident she just wants votes.
Advertisement

by Eredion » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:01 pm

by Baltenstein » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:19 pm

by Omnonia » Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:38 pm

by Eredion » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:30 am
Baltenstein wrote:About time. Seeing how there has been a majority support for gay marriage in German popular opinion for many years now, it's sort of a wonder nobody brought this up earlier. Legalizing it will be a nice gesture during Merkel's last legislative period.

by Baltenstein » Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:21 am
Eredion wrote:Baltenstein wrote:About time. Seeing how there has been a majority support for gay marriage in German popular opinion for many years now, it's sort of a wonder nobody brought this up earlier. Legalizing it will be a nice gesture during Merkel's last legislative period.
You mean the one starting after 24th of September?

by Arotania » Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:43 am

by Socialist Nordia » Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:15 am

by Remnants of Exilvania » Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:27 am
Socialist Nordia wrote:Its official, Germany has voted to legalise gay marriage!

by Othelos » Fri Jun 30, 2017 10:42 am

by Eredion » Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:07 am

by Omnonia » Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:11 am
Eredion wrote:It is also unclear whether or not the law passes into effect, due to the constitution being written very specifically on the issue of marriage as being between woman and man. The Bundestag needs a 2/3 majority to ratify the change of the constitution and they won´t get that.

by Eredion » Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:32 am
Omnonia wrote:Eredion wrote:It is also unclear whether or not the law passes into effect, due to the constitution being written very specifically on the issue of marriage as being between woman and man. The Bundestag needs a 2/3 majority to ratify the change of the constitution and they won´t get that.
It isn't. It does give "special protection to marriage" - the one sentence in the constitution that grates my cheese to no end - but it does not specify, nor strongly imply, that marriage is to be seen as "one man, one woman".

by The Empire of Pretantia » Fri Jun 30, 2017 7:09 pm
Socialist Nordia wrote:Its official, Germany has voted to legalise gay marriage!

by Eredion » Fri Jun 30, 2017 7:22 pm
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Socialist Nordia wrote:Its official, Germany has voted to legalise gay marriage!
They also vote to censor the internet!

by Major-Tom » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:05 pm
Eredion wrote:The Empire of Pretantia wrote:They also vote to censor the internet!
Kraut and Tea, the top news source for object truths... not really. He´s just another Youtube "sceptic" alt-righter. I personally would look sceptically at every one of his statements, even if he just said 2+2=4.

by Minzerland II » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:12 pm
Eredion wrote:The Empire of Pretantia wrote:They also vote to censor the internet!
Kraut and Tea, the top news source for object truths... not really. He´s just another Youtube "sceptic" alt-righter. I personally would look sceptically at every one of his statements, even if he just said 2+2=4.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Eredion » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:23 pm
Minzerland II wrote:Eredion wrote:Kraut and Tea, the top news source for object truths... not really. He´s just another Youtube "sceptic" alt-righter. I personally would look sceptically at every one of his statements, even if he just said 2+2=4.
Try to contend Kraut and Tea's video instead of talking negatively of him, please. What is the point otherwise?

by Republic Of Varra » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:26 pm
Eredion wrote:The Empire of Pretantia wrote:They also vote to censor the internet!
Kraut and Tea, the top news source for object truths... not really. He´s just another Youtube "sceptic" alt-righter. I personally would look sceptically at every one of his statements, even if he just said 2+2=4.

by Minzerland II » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:27 pm
Eredion wrote:Minzerland II wrote:Try to contend Kraut and Tea's video instead of talking negatively of him, please. What is the point otherwise?
There is nothing to contend about this video.
He starts out with complaining about how the Bundestag can dare to vote on more than one bill a day. Then for almost the entirety of the rest of the video complains about too little media coverage on the subject.
That´s it, he does not go into the specifics of the bill, other than Facebook and Twitter now apparently have to whatever the government wants from them in terms of censorship.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Neo Balka » Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:28 pm
Republic Of Varra wrote:Eredion wrote:Kraut and Tea, the top news source for object truths... not really. He´s just another Youtube "sceptic" alt-righter. I personally would look sceptically at every one of his statements, even if he just said 2+2=4.
"Alt-righter"
Literally against even joking about nazis. Is even a left-leaning libertarian. Actually condemns alt-right people.
But yeah because he's a Youtube skeptic that makes him alt-right.

by The Empire of Pretantia » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:14 pm
Eredion wrote:Minzerland II wrote:Try to contend Kraut and Tea's video instead of talking negatively of him, please. What is the point otherwise?
There is nothing to contend about this video.
He starts out with complaining about how the Bundestag can dare to vote on more than one bill a day. Then for almost the entirety of the rest of the video complains about too little media coverage on the subject.
That´s it, he does not go into the specifics of the bill, other than Facebook and Twitter now apparently have to whatever the government wants from them in terms of censorship.

by Geilinor » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:19 pm
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:Eredion wrote:There is nothing to contend about this video.
He starts out with complaining about how the Bundestag can dare to vote on more than one bill a day. Then for almost the entirety of the rest of the video complains about too little media coverage on the subject.
That´s it, he does not go into the specifics of the bill, other than Facebook and Twitter now apparently have to whatever the government wants from them in terms of censorship.
So you're saying censorship is okay?

by Liriena » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:34 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Liriena » Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:36 pm
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:They also vote to censor the internet!
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, Fahran, Floofybit, La Xinga, Loeje, Ostroeuropa, The Great Nevada Overlord, The Jamesian Republic, Zurkerx
Advertisement