NATION

PASSWORD

The People of Today Are Hungry for A Lynching. Its not good.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:37 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:
Person012345 wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:Gotta admit, it's hypocritical.

"They did something nasty. Lets do something even worse to them. That makes us good humans."

Makes me sick.

No. It says paedophiles AND abusers. Paedophiles have not neccessarily done anything wrong.

But what do you expect from antis?


I refer to all revenge killing and over the top punishment in general. I'm not getting into another debate over paedophillia here thank you very much.

I didn't intend to. Just pointing out what they said.

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:37 pm

Doing bad things is bad.... doing bad things to people who are bad, is bad... Therefore we must do bad things to the people who do bad things to people who are bad... It's a corrective measure... If there are no people left, then no person can do bad things...
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:37 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:Careful what you suggest. I swing both ways. :p

Though I suspect my girlfriend would kill you. :)


Pish. Call me when she turns eighteen.


Err... she's 10 years older than me. Odd I know, but true. :)

User avatar
Ravea
Senator
 
Posts: 3622
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Ravea » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:37 pm

MachineDeath wrote:I just saw a group on facebook called "Rapists, Peadophiles ect. Kill the lot of them" It was probably the most heartless group I have ever seen on Facebook, and I thought how sad it is that more than 1,000 people on that group agree that it's a good idea to shoot mentally ill people, and that they dont feel pain.

The people of today all seem to be blood thirsty and have a lust for murdering mental patients. I saw a post on a discussion board of that group that said:
Peadophiles should be injected with aids and used to find the cure

Another said
Rapists and Peadophiles and Abusers should be put in a real life game of Saw


I'm scared for the morality of today.

I'm Sacred, for the People of Today.


I absolutely despise rapists more than anything else, but simply executing them is quite merciful. The AIDS thing seems too harsh though, even for them.
~Omnia mutantur, nihil interit~

User avatar
Floreria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 163
Founded: Jan 22, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Floreria » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:38 pm

x
Last edited by Floreria on Tue Mar 17, 2015 10:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: -9.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

My nation's technological information
I have no powers. I mean, unless you count the power to blow minds with my weapons-grade philosophical insights. I'm a thought-o-coster, I'm a conundrummer in a band called Lifepuzzler.

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:38 pm

Floreria wrote:We actually DO test AIDS vaccines.
I wonder where they get people willing to be pumped full of HIV.


If I recall, they use Aids victims in Africa, who willingly volunteer. Gives them hope.

User avatar
Braaainsss
Diplomat
 
Posts: 742
Founded: Oct 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Braaainsss » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:39 pm

It makes me sick that anyone would hate children so much that they would want pedophiles to have AIDS.

User avatar
Wilgrove
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38647
Founded: May 08, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilgrove » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:41 pm

Well...Rapist yea, I could see Jigsaw testing them, but not Pedophiles, because there is a difference between pedophilia and a child molester. Now a child molester would be the perfect candidate for a Jigsaw game. *nods*

User avatar
Karsol
Senator
 
Posts: 4431
Founded: Jan 13, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Karsol » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:43 pm

Wilgrove wrote:Well...Rapist yea, I could see Jigsaw testing them, but not Pedophiles, because there is a difference between pedophilia and a child molester. Now a child molester would be the perfect candidate for a Jigsaw game. *nods*

It's still fucking disgusting that you would resort to such methods.
01010000 01100101 01101110 01101001 01110011 00100001 00100001 00100001
Ronald Reagan: "Well, what do you believe in? Do you want to abolish the rich?"
Olof Palme, the Prime Minister of Sweden: "No, I want to abolish the poor."

Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

User avatar
My 3rd Floor Flat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1344
Founded: Nov 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby My 3rd Floor Flat » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:43 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Preferably they will be unable to feel pain of course, we must retain our humanity after all.


Indeed. Vivisection on humans should be conducted humanely.


Now your getting it ;)

Seriously though, I wouldn't be opposed to rendering all the murderes on Death Row in Amercia brain dead and then using their bodies for something useful.
Nadkor wrote: One of the things you'll notice about the BBC is that it gets accused of bias by everyone.

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Crabulonia wrote:^ Very pleased that 3rd Floor Flat is voting same as I.

3rd floor flat is pretty sharp so you can count yourself lucky.

User avatar
MachineDeath
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: Nov 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby MachineDeath » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:43 pm

I'd like to point out that I dont advocate peados or Murdering ect.

Also, what worries me is the fact that so many people on facebook, what 40,000 people now seem to agree with that group.
Rock Lobster!

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:44 pm

MachineDeath wrote:I'd like to point out that I dont advocate peados or Murdering ect.

Also, what worries me is the fact that so many people on facebook, what 40,000 people now seem to agree with that group.


Many of them are just sheep. Following the crowd.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:44 pm

My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Now your getting it ;)

Seriously though, I wouldn't be opposed to rendering all the murderes on Death Row in Amercia brain dead and then using their bodies for something useful.


Sure, if they died of natural causes; I don't support the death penalty.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Wilgrove
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38647
Founded: May 08, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilgrove » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:47 pm

Karsol wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:Well...Rapist yea, I could see Jigsaw testing them, but not Pedophiles, because there is a difference between pedophilia and a child molester. Now a child molester would be the perfect candidate for a Jigsaw game. *nods*

It's still fucking disgusting that you would resort to such methods.


True, but in the SAW movies, the end result is not to kill them via torture, it's suppose to be a form of instant rehabilitation, abeit it really only worked on one person.

User avatar
My 3rd Floor Flat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1344
Founded: Nov 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby My 3rd Floor Flat » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:48 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Now your getting it ;)

Seriously though, I wouldn't be opposed to rendering all the murderes on Death Row in Amercia brain dead and then using their bodies for something useful.


Sure, if they died of natural causes; I don't support the death penalty.


Fair enough. I am for it, you are not, an understandable completely moral based view.

But yes, let us utilise what resources we have to maximise our chances at making the world a better place.
Nadkor wrote: One of the things you'll notice about the BBC is that it gets accused of bias by everyone.

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Crabulonia wrote:^ Very pleased that 3rd Floor Flat is voting same as I.

3rd floor flat is pretty sharp so you can count yourself lucky.

User avatar
OMGeverynameistaken
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12437
Founded: Jun 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby OMGeverynameistaken » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:48 pm

It's one thing to talk about it on the internet.
Hand the one who talked about pedophiles his needle full of AIDS and put him in a room with a child molester tied to a chair. Nine times out of ten he'll probably break down crying.
I AM DISAPPOINTED

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:48 pm

My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Fair enough. I am for it, you are not, an understandable completely moral based view.

But yes, let us utilise what resources we have to maximise our chances at making the world a better place.


Once their dead, I'm not going to be wasting my time with their rights.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Wilgrove
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38647
Founded: May 08, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilgrove » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:49 pm

I believe using humans as test subjects without their consent would violate the 8th amendment.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:50 pm

Wilgrove wrote:I believe using humans as test subjects without their consent would violate the 8th amendment.


Yeah, it probably would.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:50 pm

OMGeverynameistaken wrote:It's one thing to talk about it on the internet.
Hand the one who talked about pedophiles his needle full of AIDS and put him in a room with a child molester tied to a chair. Nine times out of ten he'll probably break down crying.


^This^

Guarenteed at least a third of the people on that Facebook group, if handed the gun, would not be able to pull the trigger.

User avatar
My 3rd Floor Flat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1344
Founded: Nov 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby My 3rd Floor Flat » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:52 pm

OMGeverynameistaken wrote:It's one thing to talk about it on the internet.
Hand the one who talked about pedophiles his needle full of AIDS and put him in a room with a child molester tied to a chair. Nine times out of ten he'll probably break down crying.


Oh of course of course, we're all human. I would indeed be one of those depsite my advocation of utilising them for such processes.

Of course, by my moral reasoning, they would have already been rendered brain dead by the time they arrived in my lab fo such tests. Thus, I wouldn't hesitate to do so. And whilst child molesting is very disgusting I would only advocate it in a case of rape or initiated sex.

The Parkus Empire wrote:
My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Fair enough. I am for it, you are not, an understandable completely moral based view.

But yes, let us utilise what resources we have to maximise our chances at making the world a better place.


Once their dead, I'm not going to be wasting my time with their rights.


Don't think that people have a say on what happens to their bodies when they die? Or just the case for murderes and so on?

Wilgrove wrote:I believe using humans as test subjects without their consent would violate the 8th amendment.


I believe that in such cases the aforementioned testing on rapists and murderers would be fully acceptable.

Given that those who were raped did not give their consent...
Nadkor wrote: One of the things you'll notice about the BBC is that it gets accused of bias by everyone.

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Crabulonia wrote:^ Very pleased that 3rd Floor Flat is voting same as I.

3rd floor flat is pretty sharp so you can count yourself lucky.

User avatar
MachineDeath
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: Nov 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby MachineDeath » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:53 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:
MachineDeath wrote:I'd like to point out that I dont advocate peados or Murdering ect.

Also, what worries me is the fact that so many people on facebook, what 40,000 people now seem to agree with that group.


Many of them are just sheep. Following the crowd.


I did consider that, but those sheep are pretty bad, too.
Rock Lobster!

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:55 pm

My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:Don't think that people have a say on what happens to their bodies when they die? Or just the case for murderes and so on?


I'm more concerned about the life of a spider in my toilet than I am about the life of a dead body, let's just put it that way.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159131
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:55 pm

Wilgrove wrote:I believe using humans as test subjects without their consent would violate the 8th amendment.

I think putting people through a game of "LOL torture for therapy" might be kinda on shaky legal ground too.


My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:
Wilgrove wrote:I believe using humans as test subjects without their consent would violate the 8th amendment.


I believe that in such cases the aforementioned testing on rapists and murderers would be fully acceptable.

Given that those who were raped did not give their consent...

Doesn't work like that.
Last edited by Ifreann on Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Wilgrove
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38647
Founded: May 08, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Wilgrove » Wed Mar 10, 2010 1:55 pm

My 3rd Floor Flat wrote:I believe that in such cases the aforementioned testing on rapists and murderers would be fully acceptable.

Given that those who were raped did not give their consent...


Sorry, I don't agree with you on this. Did they do something horrible, yes. Does that mean that we should have a free pass to violate their rights? Hell no, because it just leads down a bad path. Today is the scum of the Earth, tomorrow it's mentally challenged people or people in a Vegetative State or Coma. Sorry, I think our government eroded our rights enough, I don't think we need to help them with that.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atomtopia, Bradfordville, Corporate Collective Salvation, Democratic Poopland, Fartsniffage, Galloism, Nantoraka, New Ciencia, Perikuresu, Saturn Moons, Shrillland, Techocracy101010, The Astral Mandate, The Jamesian Republic, Tinhampton, Uiiop, Valrifall, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads