Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?
1) That's not an answer to my question.
2) I don't want to have sex with children. I'm not a pedophile. I'm pretty much asexual.
Advertisement

by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?

by Galloism » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm
Tkdkidsx2 wrote:Karsol wrote:Hark! you are not alone, I do get uncomfortable moments for minors of the ages 8-12...usually ones with blond hair, where the under layer is darker than the uppermost. Minnie clouds (FF). >.>
But no I coud never see myself wiith an actual child, though as a child I slept with adult men of my own violation.
Uhh... I think it is volition...

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?

by The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm
Des-Bal wrote:
I know thats my answer there is no maybe lets talk about it when your sexual preference involves committing a felony.

by 2nd PLT » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm
Tkdkidsx2 wrote:Karsol wrote:Hark! you are not alone, I do get uncomfortable moments for minors of the ages 8-12...usually ones with blond hair, where the under layer is darker than the uppermost. Minnie clouds (FF). >.>
But no I coud never see myself wiith an actual child, though as a child I slept with adult men of my own violation.
Uhh... I think it is volition...

by Dyakovo » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm
Des-Bal wrote:it is very likely you will escalate.

by Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Midnight Wandering » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:06 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Yes but you want to have sex with someone capable of consent that being the difference.

by Farnhamia » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:06 pm

by Izistan » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm
I am a Secondary Science teacher in training. Whilst I have to have an up to date understanding of all scientific concepts my specialism is Biology, my next interest is Chemisty, and Physics and Mathmatics I will conceed are certainly not my strong points.

by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm
The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.

by Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Tkdkidsx2 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm
Utopia-Heaven wrote:I'll list what I am in other languages before I tell you in english, and then I want you all to ACTUALLY listen to what I say before you judge.
German: Schwule Kinderlieben
French: Gai enfant amant
Spanish: Maricono amante de los niños
Anyone who actually speaks that language, feel free to tell me how badly I messed those up.
English: Gay child lover.
Now before you spout off hate, let me explain.
First, I'm not 100% gay. I just couldn't find bisexual in the translator. Second, I have never, and unless it becomes legal, will never touch a child in a sexual manner.
I am attracted to boys the ages of 5 and up. Now most of you will probably think that that is both gross and creepy. Another list will help: First, I'm 17. I don't care if you believe me or not, I'm 17 years old and a proud boylover. Second, I do not have any kind of child pornography, nor will I ever, I might like penis, but I don't like being raped by a guy named Bubba in jail. Thirdly, I would NEVER hurt a child in a physical, sexual, or mental way. For the same reasons as number 2.
I agree with most of you! Anyone who rapes or hurts or murders a child deserves to be dismembered in a painful and brutal way with dull instruments so as to increase the pain. But I am not a rapist, an abuser, or a murder. All I am is a guy, who likes other guys, and has a thing for little boys. I do not act on my urges. So please only constructive comments! I didn't do this to troll or cause flaming, I just want an open freaking dialogue with people who aren't childlovers.
Thank you.
Riaka wrote:Son, you've just entered the exciting and frightening world of religious debate. It's much like a roller coaster, in the sense that in the next few minutes there are going to many twists and turns, potential vertical inversion, a lot of crying children and someone's probably going to throw up at the end.

by Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.
Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:08 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:09 pm
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.
Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.

by Station 12 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:09 pm
Birnadia wrote:JOY unit is perfection. JOY unit cannot be questioned.
Verlorenen wrote:I might be a cold-hearted fascist, but honestly - Station 12, your posts scare the living hell out of me.
Manahakatouki wrote:I would but you scare the crap out of me....your nation anyway.....
New Caldaris wrote:LOL dude i rarely see your posts but when i do i am either laughing or terrified at the thought someone could even say something so sinister and evil.
Lockswania wrote:Station twelve, you scare me.
The Eurasican Union wrote:Station 12, My leader might be corrupt and evil on the inside, but if he was on your station, he'd jump into space as a form of suicide.

by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Don't have sex with children gets first billing.

by The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm
Farnhamia wrote:I think Des-Bal thinks they can't, not in the long run, and in order to prevent them from harming a child, they should be "rehabilitated."

by Farnhamia » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.
Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm
Midnight Wandering wrote:
But you must be a pedophile - you haven't condemned them completely! *sarcasm*


by UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm
The Imperial Navy wrote:There are plenty of times when people drop logic and reason to save those they love.

by The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:11 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Clussy Paradise, EuroStralia, Perikuresu, Vassenor, Warvick
Advertisement