NATION

PASSWORD

I'm probably going to alienate a lot of people but...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


1) That's not an answer to my question.

2) I don't want to have sex with children. I'm not a pedophile. I'm pretty much asexual.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72255
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

Tkdkidsx2 wrote:
Karsol wrote:Hark! you are not alone, I do get uncomfortable moments for minors of the ages 8-12...usually ones with blond hair, where the under layer is darker than the uppermost. Minnie clouds (FF). >.>

But no I coud never see myself wiith an actual child, though as a child I slept with adult men of my own violation.



Uhh... I think it is volition...

No, I think he got it right.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


There are plenty of women I've known, that I've wanted to have sex with, yet didn't.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


I think he's talking to you.


I know thats my answer there is no maybe lets talk about it when your sexual preference involves committing a felony.


What if they don't act on that preference? What if they control themselves?

User avatar
2nd PLT
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1462
Founded: Jul 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby 2nd PLT » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

Tkdkidsx2 wrote:
Karsol wrote:Hark! you are not alone, I do get uncomfortable moments for minors of the ages 8-12...usually ones with blond hair, where the under layer is darker than the uppermost. Minnie clouds (FF). >.>

But no I coud never see myself wiith an actual child, though as a child I slept with adult men of my own violation.



Uhh... I think it is volition...

I think Violation fits in this case.
President:Me
Vice President:Mana
First lady:Celestial Divinities
Secretary of State:Juthra
Treasurer:American Capitalist
Minister of Interior and Nukes:Kaputer
Minister of Waste Disposal:Toiletdonia
Press Secretary:Sivonaa
General of the Military:Picklepoo

Agreed. But hey, America's never really fought like a gentleman. We're more of a barroom drunk anyway.-Krazniastan
The height of ambition: A man standing on the pacific shore fapping and telling himself: "One day I am gonna fuck that ocean"-Big Jim P
Some people need to work to be made president. 2nd PLT just turns up on polling day.-Johz
Yes, but you have to remember, trolls live in a dimension between two and three, they are flat but appear to have space.-North Wiedna

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm

Des-Bal wrote:it is very likely you will escalate.

You keep saying that, and yet you provide nothing to back up your assertion...
I wonder why that is?
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


There are plenty of women I've known, that I've wanted to have sex with, yet didn't.


Yes but you want to have sex with someone capable of consent that being the difference.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Midnight Wandering
Envoy
 
Posts: 315
Founded: May 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Midnight Wandering » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


1) That's not an answer to my question.

2) I don't want to have sex with children. I'm not a pedophile. I'm pretty much asexual.


But you must be a pedophile - you haven't condemned them completely! *sarcasm*

I'm too tired for this crap - night all
"Grasping the relation of the infinite and self is an act of faith. Essentially, in virtue of absurdity, we can have both the infinite and the self in perspective and be a knight of faith. Freedom is being a ‘self’ as one wills to be… ‘Duty is the expression of God’s will’…but can’t… Can’t God be, subjectively, something or someone else? Acting for them, in duty to them, could still let us have faith. Being a knight of faith for them would mean determining your relation to the universal to your relation to the absolute"

Taken from 'Sneer and Scowl' by Yoshiyuki Ly

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:06 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Yes but you want to have sex with someone capable of consent that being the difference.


Their consent was practically as unobtainable as a child's.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:06 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


I think he's talking to you.


I know thats my answer there is no maybe lets talk about it when your sexual preference involves committing a felony.


What if they don't act on that preference? What if they control themselves?

I think Des-Bal thinks they can't, not in the long run, and in order to prevent them from harming a child, they should be "rehabilitated."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Izistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Nov 29, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby Izistan » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm

I am a Secondary Science teacher in training. Whilst I have to have an up to date understanding of all scientific concepts my specialism is Biology, my next interest is Chemisty, and Physics and Mathmatics I will conceed are certainly not my strong points.


*posts on the internet defending pedophilia*
*school administration finds post*
*hilarity insues*
306 all tha way yo, reppen fer mi home boyz thro it up

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.


Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


1) That's not an answer to my question.

2) I don't want to have sex with children. I'm not a pedophile. I'm pretty much asexual.


Yes it is thats why theres no room for discussion.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Tkdkidsx2
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1744
Founded: Feb 15, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tkdkidsx2 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm

Utopia-Heaven wrote:I'll list what I am in other languages before I tell you in english, and then I want you all to ACTUALLY listen to what I say before you judge.

German: Schwule Kinderlieben
French: Gai enfant amant
Spanish: Maricono amante de los niños

Anyone who actually speaks that language, feel free to tell me how badly I messed those up.

English: Gay child lover.

Now before you spout off hate, let me explain.

First, I'm not 100% gay. I just couldn't find bisexual in the translator. Second, I have never, and unless it becomes legal, will never touch a child in a sexual manner.

I am attracted to boys the ages of 5 and up. Now most of you will probably think that that is both gross and creepy. Another list will help: First, I'm 17. I don't care if you believe me or not, I'm 17 years old and a proud boylover. Second, I do not have any kind of child pornography, nor will I ever, I might like penis, but I don't like being raped by a guy named Bubba in jail. Thirdly, I would NEVER hurt a child in a physical, sexual, or mental way. For the same reasons as number 2.

I agree with most of you! Anyone who rapes or hurts or murders a child deserves to be dismembered in a painful and brutal way with dull instruments so as to increase the pain. But I am not a rapist, an abuser, or a murder. All I am is a guy, who likes other guys, and has a thing for little boys. I do not act on my urges. So please only constructive comments! I didn't do this to troll or cause flaming, I just want an open freaking dialogue with people who aren't childlovers.


Thank you.



German: Homosexuell Kind Liebhaber
French: Enfant amant homosexuel
Spanish: Amante hijo homosexual

Now, I think this is great. Good job, and keep up the good work. Just remember, don't turn into a child rapist. You can fantasize about them, but don't jump over the line of the law.
Riaka wrote:Son, you've just entered the exciting and frightening world of religious debate. It's much like a roller coaster, in the sense that in the next few minutes there are going to many twists and turns, potential vertical inversion, a lot of crying children and someone's probably going to throw up at the end.


Wilgrove wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Texas school book repositories are dangerous places.


JFK can attest to that! *nods*

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:07 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.


Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.

Don't have sex with children gets first billing.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:08 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Yes but you want to have sex with someone capable of consent that being the difference.


Their consent was practically as unobtainable as a child's.

No, they don't want to have sex with you the child physically cannot consent.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:09 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.


Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.


There are plenty of times when people drop logic and reason to save those they love.

User avatar
Station 12
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1606
Founded: Nov 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Station 12 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:09 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?

Sexually attracted to =/= wants to have sex with

I'm bisexual. I'm still slightly homophobic, so I'd rather have sex with a woman than a man, but all the same, I find men attractive.

Just like a pedophile would rather have sex with adults that are legally of age rather than children who are not.
Welcome to Station 12, citizen. Have a HAPPY day.

Birnadia wrote:JOY unit is perfection. JOY unit cannot be questioned.

Verlorenen wrote:I might be a cold-hearted fascist, but honestly - Station 12, your posts scare the living hell out of me.

Manahakatouki wrote:I would but you scare the crap out of me....your nation anyway.....

New Caldaris wrote:LOL dude i rarely see your posts but when i do i am either laughing or terrified at the thought someone could even say something so sinister and evil.

Lockswania wrote:Station twelve, you scare me.

The Eurasican Union wrote:Station 12, My leader might be corrupt and evil on the inside, but if he was on your station, he'd jump into space as a form of suicide.

User avatar
Franberry
Diplomat
 
Posts: 641
Founded: Dec 09, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Franberry » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:09 pm

Guys I need a used white panel van

I figured this would be the thread to ask for some good deals
Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny.
-Aeschylus

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Don't have sex with children gets first billing.


It does not. Humans don't matter. Children are humans. Ergo, children don't really matter. Look at this universe. Do you really think humanity is significant? No, it is not, not in the slightest. All life on Earth could cease tomorrow and the universe would be almost completely unaffected.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm

Farnhamia wrote:I think Des-Bal thinks they can't, not in the long run, and in order to prevent them from harming a child, they should be "rehabilitated."


Yeah. *Headbutts wall*

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.


Nothing matters more than logic and reason. The fate of all humans matters less than mathematical and scientific truth, which transcend such a pitiful species.

Really? And yet the beauty and truth, the wonder you find in mathematical and scientific truth have been described for you by members of that same pitiful species. I generally like you, UT, but I find this aspect of your personality less attractive.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm

Midnight Wandering wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


1) That's not an answer to my question.

2) I don't want to have sex with children. I'm not a pedophile. I'm pretty much asexual.


But you must be a pedophile - you haven't condemned them completely! *sarcasm*


But by his own admission, he spends his days Fiddling on the rroof

Wow, 35 pages and 2 Monkey Dust quotes in a single day. :o
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:10 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:There are plenty of times when people drop logic and reason to save those they love.


That is, however, an incorrect action on their part.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:11 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:There are plenty of times when people drop logic and reason to save those they love.


That is, however, an incorrect action on their part.


Incorrect, but it does happen.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Clussy Paradise, EuroStralia, Perikuresu, Vassenor, Warvick

Advertisement

Remove ads