NATION

PASSWORD

I'm probably going to alienate a lot of people but...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Midnight Wandering
Envoy
 
Posts: 315
Founded: May 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Midnight Wandering » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:50 pm

Station 12 wrote:
Izistan wrote:
Station 12 wrote:
Izistan wrote:
Pedophilia is neither an ideology nor is it voluntary. As it isn't an ideology, it can't preach the message of molesting children.


You might want to read Perverted Justice with its numerous recorded examples of pedophile advocacy. Advocacy in this case: "pedophilia is a acceptable lifestyle and btw here is how to molest children".

I looked them up. They say that pedophilia should be designated a sexual orientation rather than a mental illness. That seems fair enough to me.

I'm pretty sure I'd be pissed off if they decided homosexuality, or bisexuality were mental illnesses.


"Pedophilia is an incurable mental illness. "
"SIR I AM HIGHLY OFFENDED BY THIS STATEMENT."

Can someone point me to the point in this statement?

If you don't know the way, I'd like to find the logic as well.


I think the point is he didn't have a relevant response but couldn't stand to be silenced
"Grasping the relation of the infinite and self is an act of faith. Essentially, in virtue of absurdity, we can have both the infinite and the self in perspective and be a knight of faith. Freedom is being a ‘self’ as one wills to be… ‘Duty is the expression of God’s will’…but can’t… Can’t God be, subjectively, something or someone else? Acting for them, in duty to them, could still let us have faith. Being a knight of faith for them would mean determining your relation to the universal to your relation to the absolute"

Taken from 'Sneer and Scowl' by Yoshiyuki Ly

User avatar
Izistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Nov 29, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby Izistan » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:54 pm

Jesus, you all need a goddamn crash course in mathematics and propositional logic. These arguments are embarrassingly bad.


*justifies child rape with mathematics*
*is beaten by crowd of rational people*
306 all tha way yo, reppen fer mi home boyz thro it up

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:55 pm

Izistan wrote:
Jesus, you all need a goddamn crash course in mathematics and propositional logic. These arguments are embarrassingly bad.


*justifies child rape with mathematics*
*is beaten by crowd of rational people*

Who is talking about child rape? The only people talking about child rape are the antis.

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:56 pm

I'm sorry... where were we? I forgot what we were debating. :meh:

User avatar
Midnight Wandering
Envoy
 
Posts: 315
Founded: May 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Midnight Wandering » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:56 pm

Izistan wrote:
Jesus, you all need a goddamn crash course in mathematics and propositional logic. These arguments are embarrassingly bad.


*justifies child rape with mathematics*
*is beaten by crowd of rational people*


What part of pedophiles do not always rape children do you not understand?
What part of not all child rapsist are pedophiles can't you grasp?
"Grasping the relation of the infinite and self is an act of faith. Essentially, in virtue of absurdity, we can have both the infinite and the self in perspective and be a knight of faith. Freedom is being a ‘self’ as one wills to be… ‘Duty is the expression of God’s will’…but can’t… Can’t God be, subjectively, something or someone else? Acting for them, in duty to them, could still let us have faith. Being a knight of faith for them would mean determining your relation to the universal to your relation to the absolute"

Taken from 'Sneer and Scowl' by Yoshiyuki Ly

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:58 pm

Station 12 wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Child molestation is related to pedophilia in the same sense that nazis are related to kiling jews.


That is the worst comparison I have ever seen.

How so? I'm sure there are plenty of Nazis who don't kill jews in fact if there were any nazi sympathists here I'm sure you'd get a stern talking to.

First of all, being a nazi is a choice, pedophilia is not.

Second of all, part of the nazi ideology is the master race and the destruction of jews.

Yes, there were germans who helped the jews in WW2, because of that, they weren't technically nazis because they didn't follow the ideology.

If treatment is available and you choose not to get it it is a choice.
Being a pedophile is the sexual attraction to children. Sexual attraction to children and having sex with children aren't the same thing, neither are the the desire of a master race and killing jews.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:58 pm

Midnight Wandering wrote:What part of not all child rapsist are pedophiles can't you grasp?


The sexual part.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Franberry
Diplomat
 
Posts: 641
Founded: Dec 09, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Franberry » Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:59 pm

the worst thread
Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny.
-Aeschylus

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:00 pm

Midnight Wandering wrote:What part of pedophiles do not always rape children do you not understand?
What part of not all child rapsist are pedophiles can't you grasp?


The part where OMG teh chilluns!!!!!111!! caused him to abandon the one thing that makes humans worthy of any moral consideration, reason.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:00 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Midnight Wandering wrote:What part of not all child rapsist are pedophiles can't you grasp?


The sexual part.


Maybe he's a virgin or something. *shrug*

User avatar
Midnight Wandering
Envoy
 
Posts: 315
Founded: May 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Midnight Wandering » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:01 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
Midnight Wandering wrote:What part of not all child rapsist are pedophiles can't you grasp?


The sexual part.


Requoting: A perpetrator of child sexual abuse is commonly assumed to be and referred to as a pedophile; however, there may be other motivations for the crime[55] (such as stress, marital problems, or the unavailability of an adult partner).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia ... olestation
"Grasping the relation of the infinite and self is an act of faith. Essentially, in virtue of absurdity, we can have both the infinite and the self in perspective and be a knight of faith. Freedom is being a ‘self’ as one wills to be… ‘Duty is the expression of God’s will’…but can’t… Can’t God be, subjectively, something or someone else? Acting for them, in duty to them, could still let us have faith. Being a knight of faith for them would mean determining your relation to the universal to your relation to the absolute"

Taken from 'Sneer and Scowl' by Yoshiyuki Ly

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:01 pm

Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:01 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Station 12 wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Child molestation is related to pedophilia in the same sense that nazis are related to kiling jews.


That is the worst comparison I have ever seen.

How so? I'm sure there are plenty of Nazis who don't kill jews in fact if there were any nazi sympathists here I'm sure you'd get a stern talking to.

First of all, being a nazi is a choice, pedophilia is not.

Second of all, part of the nazi ideology is the master race and the destruction of jews.

Yes, there were germans who helped the jews in WW2, because of that, they weren't technically nazis because they didn't follow the ideology.

If treatment is available and you choose not to get it it is a choice.
Being a pedophile is the sexual attraction to children. Sexual attraction to children and having sex with children aren't the same thing, neither are the the desire of a master race and killing jews.

How do you propose to find the pedophiles so they can be rehabilitated? You'll have to have some kind of legal apparatus under which you can round them up for rehabilitation. What do you propose?
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:02 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:02 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?


Because nothing matters more than protecting kids. it's a maternal instinct. We'd kill everyone in the world if we felt it'd protect our own offspring.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:02 pm

Person012345 wrote:
Solyhniya wrote:
Utopia-Heaven wrote:snip

I agree with most of you! Anyone who rapes or hurts or murders a child deserves to be dismembered in a painful and brutal way with dull instruments so as to increase the pain. But I am not a rapist, an abuser, or a murder. All I am is a guy, who likes other guys, and has a thing for little boys. I do not act on my urges. So please only constructive comments! I didn't do this to troll or cause flaming, I just want an open freaking dialogue with people who aren't childlovers.


Thank you.


...in which case I commend you for being able to resist such urges. Fetishes and fantasies are normal; knowing you have one, that it might be harmful and therefore exercising the willpower to restrain it is, I think, venerable. I should imagine it would be as hard for you to give up your sexuality as for me and many others to give up being straight. It must be torturous!

Anyone who is "alienated" by your post should know this: you can't help the way you are, but you can choose whether to act on instinct no matter how difficult that is.

I wish more people thought like that. A lot of people hear "paedophile" and think "monster".

I'll admit that is my first reaction...
Of course, one difference is I keep thinking after that initial reaction...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:Maybe he's a virgin or something. *shrug*


"The hole. . . .? In my argument?"
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


I think he's talking to you.

User avatar
Picklepoo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1167
Founded: Oct 13, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Picklepoo » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

I think you have MJ sindrom
Just call me Pickle

Zombies are fucking awesome...

I am so into NS porn...pointless threads really just turn me on! Wait until I'm done my fan fiction...we're going to have nation on nation action here!~ Scarsaw

A daddy bull and his boy bull are standing on a hill, overlooking a valley of cows.

The son says "Hey dad, let's run down there a fuck two of those cows!"

And the dad says, "Son, let's walk down there, and fuck 'em all."~ ?

Chuck Norris can kick Rambo's ass with his penis!~ Manahakatouki

Its noisy outside with the birds, bees, and their incessant humping!~ Tyr-risuur

Theres a ghost in my shower! And she wont let me masturbate!~ Vanished shame

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

The Parkus Empire wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:Maybe he's a virgin or something. *shrug*


"The hole. . . .? In my argument?"


:rofl:

User avatar
Tkdkidsx2
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1744
Founded: Feb 15, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tkdkidsx2 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

Karsol wrote:Hark! you are not alone, I do get uncomfortable moments for minors of the ages 8-12...usually ones with blond hair, where the under layer is darker than the uppermost. Minnie clouds (FF). >.>

But no I coud never see myself wiith an actual child, though as a child I slept with adult men of my own violation.



Uhh... I think it is volition...
Riaka wrote:Son, you've just entered the exciting and frightening world of religious debate. It's much like a roller coaster, in the sense that in the next few minutes there are going to many twists and turns, potential vertical inversion, a lot of crying children and someone's probably going to throw up at the end.


Wilgrove wrote:
Rambhutan wrote:Texas school book repositories are dangerous places.


JFK can attest to that! *nods*

User avatar
My 3rd Floor Flat
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1344
Founded: Nov 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby My 3rd Floor Flat » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

Only if you don't understand what an equality relation actually entails. For somebody claiming scientific support, you sure as hell can't use terminology properly.

+

The way you put forward your points affects what they mean. That's kinda why I care. Your talking to a mathematician and physicist in training here. I don't know what your profession is, but around here, throwing terminology around haphazardly is not acceptable. Every statement must be carefully phrased.


I am a Secondary Science teacher in training. Whilst I have to have an up to date understanding of all scientific concepts my specialism is Biology, my next interest is Chemisty, and Physics and Mathmatics I will conceed are certainly not my strong points.

Interestingly this explains why most of our discussion has centered around terminology, because contrary to what you have accused me of I am using terminology correctly but to me it means something different because it has a different meaning in my primary discipline. I will also conceed that science is built upon maths, then physics, then chemistry, the biology and thus when it comes to accuracy in making statements I am less accurate. After all, 2+1=3, but to explain a biological issue requires a more linguistic approach.

With regard to "equality" and "chemical imbalance". Would it be clearer to you, or rather, more preferable, if I said, "A chemical imbalance caused when a set of relevant chemicals in the brain exceed their expected ratios to levels which would cause unexpected behaviour not of the norm."?

Recall our argument over the definition of the word "average". It had multiple definitions.

1) Stop calling it an imbalance.


See above, in my context and terminology it is an imbalance.

2) As there's not much scientific consensus on the cause of homosexuality, I'm not going to presume that it is necessarily chemical in nature. I like to make statements that I can actually support.


Fair enough.

3) In no case could the chemical setup itself be considered the illness. The cause and the effect are separate entities.


Really? I would consider the symptoms of skitzophrenia (spelling of it has escaped my mind) to me a result of the "chemical set up", or as I put it, "imbalance". I would equate the same to homosexuality in the cases which I propose would be caused by chemical imbalances.

So, demonstrate that homosexuality IS chemically caused and I will accept it.


Fair enough.

I still won't call the chemical setup an imbalance, however


Using the terminology applicapble to me and as I set it out above would you?
Last edited by My 3rd Floor Flat on Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nadkor wrote: One of the things you'll notice about the BBC is that it gets accused of bias by everyone.

Mad hatters in jeans wrote:
Crabulonia wrote:^ Very pleased that 3rd Floor Flat is voting same as I.

3rd floor flat is pretty sharp so you can count yourself lucky.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:03 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Something inbred, evolved, to protect the small, mostly cute offspring? Not so hard to understand. 'Taint logical but I do understand it.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Death Gates
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Mar 04, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Death Gates » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

Man, I tried to go through the entire thread before participating but you guys are too fast for me :) and I have a job to go tomorrow morning (it's 1:00 am here). So I just have to write and leave for tonight.

Utopia, Person, and others who are sure about childrens thoughts and likings, please make a good hard search on child psychology like Farnh (sorry Farnh for misspelling) was trying to imply you. The fact that we get our sexual urges around 12 doesn't mean we should immediately go for it. And before adolesence..? Curiosity should not be mixed up with arousal.

Heck, I also like to see beatiful teenagers around and even I sometimes wished to hang around with some. However it's like playing with cells of an embryo because just you find it interesting (meaning their pychology of course). You can never know what will come out of it. Mostly comes something bad though.

And last, you don't want to consult to a professional just because you don't want to but suggest a worldwide evaluation on kids to justify them being able to have sex with adults? That doesn't seem honest to me.
Last edited by The Death Gates on Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:04 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:Here's a good question. Why do people abandon all sense and logic the second children are involved?

Because you can't have sex with children and you want to have sex with children?


I think he's talking to you.


I know thats my answer there is no maybe lets talk about it when your sexual preference involves committing a felony.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Clussy Paradise, Enormous Gentiles, EuroStralia, Perikuresu, Vassenor, Warvick

Advertisement

Remove ads