This might be a rum moment. Captain Morgan?
Advertisement

by Grainne Ni Malley » Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:59 pm

by Reploid Productions » Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:01 pm
Senestrum wrote:Fuck you for not banning the lot of 'em.

[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.

by Utopia-Heaven » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:02 pm

by JuNii » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:04 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:12 pm

by Utopia-Heaven » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:18 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:21 pm
Utopia-Heaven wrote:Weirdly enough I can ONLY stand on my feet. Never been able to do a handstand.

by Utopia-Heaven » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:29 pm

by 2nd PLT » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:37 pm
Utopia-Heaven wrote:I have tried!! It's really difficult!
Soooo, did anyone else see that someone tried to get our thread smashed? Imperial and the mod totally rock.

by Person012345 » Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:57 pm
Utopia-Heaven wrote:I have tried!! It's really difficult!
Soooo, did anyone else see that someone tried to get our thread smashed? Imperial and the mod totally rock.

by Utopia-Heaven » Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:39 am

by Utopia-Heaven » Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:41 am

by 2nd PLT » Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:48 am
Utopia-Heaven wrote:http://pedofriends.blogspot.com

by Person012345 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:56 am
2nd PLT wrote:Utopia-Heaven wrote:http://pedofriends.blogspot.com
I don't know if it was you who chose the name for that website, but you really should have chosen a different name.
One that doesn't immediately give up your position and make people (Like some who have shown up here, and got warned my mods) turn away in disgust, or prepping their explosives.
Preferably one in another language, one that hasn't been used for a while, like Babylonian, or early Sanskrit, ya know what I'm getting at.

by Natapoc » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:00 am

by Mutant Lobster People » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:02 am
Mutant Lobster People wrote:i fail to see why this is going to alienate a lot of people. Also, why do people think the guy who started the thread is an evil pervert? he clearly said he finds it immoral to violate children.
Dinosaurana wrote:I am not fucking kid.
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Why is there an 11 page thread arguing about pubic hair?
Progressiae wrote:Dinosaur My Is Purple-Raisins
Chatkasatan wrote:Or people who serve poop in ice cream.
An issue about gay adoption wrote:"Think about it: say you have two gay Mutant DinosaurApeCrabs"
The Altani Federation wrote:Are you lobsters trying to wreck your economy?

by Nobel Hobos » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:06 am
Utopia-Heaven wrote:http://pedofriends.blogspot.com

by Person012345 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:07 am
Natapoc wrote:Roughly 33% of girls and 14% of boys are molested before becoming adults. Given such statistics and the life deep emotional and sometimes physical pain such molestation typically brings a person it is understandable and fully reasonable that people would be very upset in seeing a person who self identifies as a pedophile being treated respectably by society.
Now I understand that the OP here claims he has not acted on his urges. Well that is good but many people will see any sort of niceties in communicating with him to be implicit endorsement of pedophiles in general and specifically the pedophile who hurt him or her. For some such discussion may even give flashbacks of the event forcing them to relive it. Some past victims of abuse revert to child like mentalities when this occurs to protect themselves.
Given the above truth I hope the OP and others can understand why certain individuals would be unable to calmly and politely discuss anything with him without using emotionally charged language.

by Person012345 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:10 am
Mutant Lobster People wrote:Mutant Lobster People wrote:i fail to see why this is going to alienate a lot of people. Also, why do people think the guy who started the thread is an evil pervert? he clearly said he finds it immoral to violate children.
someone please answer these questions
edit: natapoc answered my second question, but can someone answer my first?

by Natapoc » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:11 am
Person012345 wrote:Natapoc wrote:Roughly 33% of girls and 14% of boys are molested before becoming adults. Given such statistics and the life deep emotional and sometimes physical pain such molestation typically brings a person it is understandable and fully reasonable that people would be very upset in seeing a person who self identifies as a pedophile being treated respectably by society.
Now I understand that the OP here claims he has not acted on his urges. Well that is good but many people will see any sort of niceties in communicating with him to be implicit endorsement of pedophiles in general and specifically the pedophile who hurt him or her. For some such discussion may even give flashbacks of the event forcing them to relive it. Some past victims of abuse revert to child like mentalities when this occurs to protect themselves.
Given the above truth I hope the OP and others can understand why certain individuals would be unable to calmly and politely discuss anything with him without using emotionally charged language.
What is the source of those statistics? My statistics say: "Approximately 15% to 25% of women and 5% to 15% of men were sexually abused when they were children."
And I very much doubt many are even aware of those types of numbers. Or have been abused. Whilst I have utmost sympathy for those who have, I know a few people who were abused, and most of them, if not all of them are happy to talk to me. The worst people for us are people who don't actually know anything and simply need something to hate, or those who have been brainwashed by society into having an immediate "OMG you disgust me, go die" reaction.

by Nobel Hobos » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:19 am
Person012345 wrote:Natapoc wrote:Roughly 33% of girls and 14% of boys are molested before becoming adults. Given such statistics and the life deep emotional and sometimes physical pain such molestation typically brings a person it is understandable and fully reasonable that people would be very upset in seeing a person who self identifies as a pedophile being treated respectably by society.
Now I understand that the OP here claims he has not acted on his urges. Well that is good but many people will see any sort of niceties in communicating with him to be implicit endorsement of pedophiles in general and specifically the pedophile who hurt him or her. For some such discussion may even give flashbacks of the event forcing them to relive it. Some past victims of abuse revert to child like mentalities when this occurs to protect themselves.
Given the above truth I hope the OP and others can understand why certain individuals would be unable to calmly and politely discuss anything with him without using emotionally charged language.
What is the source of those statistics? My statistics say: "Approximately 15% to 25% of women and 5% to 15% of men were sexually abused when they were children."
And I very much doubt many are even aware of those types of numbers. Or have been abused. Whilst I have utmost sympathy for those who have, I know a few people who were abused, and most of them, if not all of them are happy to talk to me. The worst people for us are people who don't actually know anything and simply need something to hate, or those who have been brainwashed by society into having an immediate "OMG you disgust me, go die" reaction.

by Person012345 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:20 am
Natapoc wrote:Person012345 wrote:Natapoc wrote:Roughly 33% of girls and 14% of boys are molested before becoming adults. Given such statistics and the life deep emotional and sometimes physical pain such molestation typically brings a person it is understandable and fully reasonable that people would be very upset in seeing a person who self identifies as a pedophile being treated respectably by society.
Now I understand that the OP here claims he has not acted on his urges. Well that is good but many people will see any sort of niceties in communicating with him to be implicit endorsement of pedophiles in general and specifically the pedophile who hurt him or her. For some such discussion may even give flashbacks of the event forcing them to relive it. Some past victims of abuse revert to child like mentalities when this occurs to protect themselves.
Given the above truth I hope the OP and others can understand why certain individuals would be unable to calmly and politely discuss anything with him without using emotionally charged language.
What is the source of those statistics? My statistics say: "Approximately 15% to 25% of women and 5% to 15% of men were sexually abused when they were children."
And I very much doubt many are even aware of those types of numbers. Or have been abused. Whilst I have utmost sympathy for those who have, I know a few people who were abused, and most of them, if not all of them are happy to talk to me. The worst people for us are people who don't actually know anything and simply need something to hate, or those who have been brainwashed by society into having an immediate "OMG you disgust me, go die" reaction.
I failed to mention that my stats were from the united states justice department. So probably only valid for the US. Most people who were abused do not feel comfortable talking about it. This is doubly so of male victims who are more likely to deny it or to think they did something wrong and it was their fault.

by Person012345 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:25 am
Nobel Hobos wrote:Person012345 wrote:Natapoc wrote:Roughly 33% of girls and 14% of boys are molested before becoming adults. Given such statistics and the life deep emotional and sometimes physical pain such molestation typically brings a person it is understandable and fully reasonable that people would be very upset in seeing a person who self identifies as a pedophile being treated respectably by society.
Now I understand that the OP here claims he has not acted on his urges. Well that is good but many people will see any sort of niceties in communicating with him to be implicit endorsement of pedophiles in general and specifically the pedophile who hurt him or her. For some such discussion may even give flashbacks of the event forcing them to relive it. Some past victims of abuse revert to child like mentalities when this occurs to protect themselves.
Given the above truth I hope the OP and others can understand why certain individuals would be unable to calmly and politely discuss anything with him without using emotionally charged language.
What is the source of those statistics? My statistics say: "Approximately 15% to 25% of women and 5% to 15% of men were sexually abused when they were children."
Multiple victims per molestor usually.
Harder to measure but more significant is the proportion of adults who are pedophiles. That would give us some idea of what proportion of pedophiles actually molest children. I remember reading somewhere that when measured in a lab, a surprisingly high proportion of men (the study was done with men) have some paedophilic attraction. It was mentioned in a previous thread.And I very much doubt many are even aware of those types of numbers. Or have been abused. Whilst I have utmost sympathy for those who have, I know a few people who were abused, and most of them, if not all of them are happy to talk to me. The worst people for us are people who don't actually know anything and simply need something to hate, or those who have been brainwashed by society into having an immediate "OMG you disgust me, go die" reaction.
I'd drop the word "brainwashed" from your vocabulary if I were you.![]()
Otherwise, I've enjoyed your posts. A bit confronting I guess but you keep your temper well.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Glomb, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Luna Amore, Necroghastia, Newplym, Port Caverton, Rary, Sash Lilac, The Holy Rat
Advertisement