NATION

PASSWORD

I'm probably going to alienate a lot of people but...

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:53 pm

What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.

Des-Bal: Can you not see the sheer idiocy in your argument?

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:54 pm

Person012345 wrote:What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.

Des-Bal: Can you not see the sheer idiocy in your argument?


Clearly not.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:55 pm

The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Yes I can. The fact you won't accept that proof doesn't change the fact it is there.
I do study psychiatry.


Prove it. :)

You can never win. Your logic is fatally flawed.


Its not flawed.
If a pedophile is a person who wants to have sex with children and I do not want to have sex with children I am not a pedophile.
I could provide diagrams of which part of my brain respond to the stimulus of young children however I don't want to waste the time or money doing this for self-proclaimed internet pedophiles.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:56 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Its actually because I'm firing six guns at once.

The fact someone will die having never had sex with a child doesn't mean they would have if they had kept on living. Unless they are a pedophile in which case thats exactly what it means.


How do you know that they won't eventually fuck a child? Non-pedophiles have molested children before.

Besides, this still doesn't change the fact that your earlier statement was a tautology.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:57 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Yes I can. The fact you won't accept that proof doesn't change the fact it is there.
I do study psychiatry.


Prove it. :)

You can never win. Your logic is fatally flawed.


Its not flawed.
If a pedophile is a person who wants to have sex with children and I do not want to have sex with children I am not a pedophile.
I could provide diagrams of which part of my brain respond to the stimulus of young children however I don't want to waste the time or money doing this for self-proclaimed internet pedophiles.


Brain scans would only prove that you didn't have sexual urges towards children at the moment of the test. That does not prove you never have, or never will have, such urges.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:57 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Its not flawed.
If a pedophile is a person who wants to have sex with children and I do not want to have sex with children I am not a pedophile.
I could provide diagrams of which part of my brain respond to the stimulus of young children however I don't want to waste the time or money doing this for self-proclaimed internet pedophiles.


I not once, claimed to be a Pedophile. Also, no proof, no logic. Your lack of desire to provide proof, actually proves you have no idea what you are on about.

You continue to claim to not be a pedophile without proof to back you up. You are again defeated by your own logic.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:57 pm

Person012345 wrote:What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.

Des-Bal: Can you not see the sheer idiocy in your argument?


They either will or they will die before they do.
I can see how that sounds odd I can also see how killing them would achieve the same goal and the risk of severe psychological damage to a child is really worth the suffering of a pedophile.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:57 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Its not flawed.
If a pedophile is a person who wants to have sex with children and I do not want to have sex with children I am not a pedophile.
I could provide diagrams of which part of my brain respond to the stimulus of young children however I don't want to waste the time or money doing this for self-proclaimed internet pedophiles.


Once again, disagreement with you automatically makes one a pedophile.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Izistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Nov 29, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby Izistan » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:57 pm

What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...
306 all tha way yo, reppen fer mi home boyz thro it up

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:58 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
The Imperial Navy wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Yes I can. The fact you won't accept that proof doesn't change the fact it is there.
I do study psychiatry.


Prove it. :)

You can never win. Your logic is fatally flawed.


Its not flawed.
If a pedophile is a person who wants to have sex with children and I do not want to have sex with children I am not a pedophile.
I could provide diagrams of which part of my brain respond to the stimulus of young children however I don't want to waste the time or money doing this for self-proclaimed internet pedophiles.

Most of the people you are talking to are not paedos. I believe I am the only paedo remaining here. You want my opinion? We have beaten your argument. But you refuse to let go of your views that have been brainwashed into you by society. Please, stop arguing for the sake of it, and actually think hard about what has been put to you, and what is being put to you.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:58 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Its actually because I'm firing six guns at once.

The fact someone will die having never had sex with a child doesn't mean they would have if they had kept on living. Unless they are a pedophile in which case thats exactly what it means.


How do you know that they won't eventually fuck a child? Non-pedophiles have molested children before.

Besides, this still doesn't change the fact that your earlier statement was a tautology.


Those are indiscriminants and are equally twisted.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:58 pm

Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...


Killing you would prevent you from having sex with a child too. Perhaps we should just kill you?
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Person012345
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16783
Founded: Feb 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Person012345 » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:58 pm

Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...

So everyone should be castrated. Because everyone will either have sex with a child, or won't?

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:58 pm

Izistan wrote:It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...


So would killing all children. Do you think that;s a good idea?
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:59 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Its not flawed.
If a pedophile is a person who wants to have sex with children and I do not want to have sex with children I am not a pedophile.
I could provide diagrams of which part of my brain respond to the stimulus of young children however I don't want to waste the time or money doing this for self-proclaimed internet pedophiles.


Once again, disagreement with you automatically makes one a pedophile.

No being sexually attracted to children makesyou aa pedophile and as several people have attested to being pedophiles they are likely pedophiles.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:59 pm

Person012345 wrote:
Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...

So everyone should be castrated. Because everyone will either have sex with a child, or won't?

No just the pedos.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:00 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Those are indiscriminants and are equally twisted.


But they aren't pedophiles. Your argument is getting more and more tortured with every post.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

User avatar
Izistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Nov 29, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby Izistan » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:00 pm

Sdaeriji wrote:
Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...


Killing you would prevent you from having sex with a child too. Perhaps we should just kill you?


Wanna do a suicide pact then?
306 all tha way yo, reppen fer mi home boyz thro it up

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:00 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Person012345 wrote:
Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...

So everyone should be castrated. Because everyone will either have sex with a child, or won't?

No just the pedos.


How would you demonstrate someone to be a pedophile if they've never acted on their urges?
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Izistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 288
Founded: Nov 29, 2003
Ex-Nation

Postby Izistan » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:00 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Izistan wrote:It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...


So would killing all children. Do you think that;s a good idea?


That would actually.
306 all tha way yo, reppen fer mi home boyz thro it up

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:01 pm

UnhealthyTruthseeker wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Those are indiscriminants and are equally twisted.


But they aren't pedophiles. Your argument is getting more and more tortured with every post.

An apple is fruit. A banana is a fruit. An apple is not a banana.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The Imperial Navy
Minister
 
Posts: 3485
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Imperial Navy » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:01 pm

Des-Bal wrote:No just the pedos.


So, you as well then. Your logic suggests so. You can't prove you don't have thoughts about sex with a minor, so maybe we should castrate you too?

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32124
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:01 pm

Sdaeriji wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Person012345 wrote:
Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...

So everyone should be castrated. Because everyone will either have sex with a child, or won't?

No just the pedos.


How would you demonstrate someone to be a pedophile if they've never acted on their urges?

Psychological testing.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:01 pm

Izistan wrote:
Sdaeriji wrote:
Izistan wrote:
What Des-Bal is essentially saying is that pedos should be castrated because they will either have sex with a child or they won't.


It would prevent sex with a child in the first place so...


Killing you would prevent you from having sex with a child too. Perhaps we should just kill you?


Wanna do a suicide pact then?


No, because I'm not a moron advocating punishing people for things they haven't done. You are.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
UnhealthyTruthseeker
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11988
Founded: Aug 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby UnhealthyTruthseeker » Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:01 pm

Des-Bal wrote:No just the pedos.


Two problems with this.

1) You still haven't pointed out exactly how we're going to track down every single pedophile in existence.

2) This still won't prevent all molestations.
A little homework for you!

What part of L(f(t)) = Int(exp(-s*t)*f(t),t,0,inf) don't you understand?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belarusball, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Glomb, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Luna Amore, Necroghastia, Newplym, Port Caverton, Rary, Sash Lilac, The Holy Rat

Advertisement

Remove ads