NATION

PASSWORD

"Men Must Approve Abortion, Women Are Hosts"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:39 pm

Knights of Columbia wrote:
Lady Scylla wrote:
And lesbians? Then what?

I said "family."

I have some crazy news for you. Lesbians can raise families too.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Finium
Senator
 
Posts: 3849
Founded: Nov 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Finium » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:39 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Finium wrote:While pregnant a woman has all the rights, ergo fathers and mothers are not considered equal under the law.


the man still has full control over his body.

But we're not really talking about his/her body, this is more of an issue with the genetically recombinated tumor that they could probably both copyright if they wanted.
big chungus, small among us

User avatar
Knights of Columbia
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Knights of Columbia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:40 pm

Lady Scylla wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:She should be imprisoned. Ironically enough, eliminating her genes from the pool would be the best solution.


Image

Condescending, snarky gifs don't refute my answer.

User avatar
Walrusvylon
Diplomat
 
Posts: 796
Founded: Nov 04, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Walrusvylon » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:40 pm

Trotza wrote:
Walrusvylon wrote:

I agree. Bodily sovereignty is not really a thing. It is not mentioned in the Bill of Rights anywhere.

There are many things that exist that are not in the Bill of Rights, so that's not saying much.


True.
Reactionary rad-trad. Born between 6 and 11 centuries too late. Neocameralist some days, un-constitutional monarchist and neo-Luddite other days. Tolkien enthusiast. Neoreaction/Dark Enlightenment reader.
'Equality is the opposite of quality.'
'I strongly urge you to read Moldbug!'
'I am an excellent proof-reader... after I click submit.'

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:40 pm

Knights of Columbia wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:what recourse would you suggest when a woman gets an abortion anyway? what if she doesn't get an abortion but she also doesn't take good care of herself, theoretically putting the fetus in danger?

She should be imprisoned. Ironically enough, eliminating her genes from the pool would be the best solution.

prison? for not allowing the father a veto?
whatever

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42342
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:40 pm

Walrusvylon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
Because they're being denied the opportunity to be a father, if that is what the father wants to be.



So, something you created that conveniently disproves my opinion?



A divorce perhaps, where the woman had an abortion and he did not want her to have one?



Where did I say we should make women slaves?



Bodily sovereignty falls flat given humans are routinely subjected to violations of bodily sovereignty without their consent.


I agree. Bodily sovereignty is not really a thing. It is not mentioned in the Bill of Rights anywhere.

English common law is a thing. It is the basis for our system of laws.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Galloism wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:oh yes it would be SOOO Much better to have those babies DIE rather than have a way for women to hand over babies safely then sort it all out later.

Then you admit children do not have a right to support from both parents.

If you do not have the strength of your convictions, you should abandon them.

I thought you were against mandatory child support from absent fathers?
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Walrusvylon wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:She should be imprisoned. Ironically enough, eliminating her genes from the pool would be the best solution.


Yer a troll


You're, relatively, new. Trollnaming is against the rules, mind. Let's not.

User avatar
Knights of Columbia
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Knights of Columbia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Wallenburg wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:I said "family."

I have some crazy news for you. Lesbians can raise families too.

I don't believe so. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Walrusvylon wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:She should be imprisoned. Ironically enough, eliminating her genes from the pool would be the best solution.


Yer a troll

pssst

calling people trolls isn't allowed here. if you think someone is trolling you have to report it in moderation and they will deal with it.
whatever

User avatar
Walrusvylon
Diplomat
 
Posts: 796
Founded: Nov 04, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Walrusvylon » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Walrusvylon wrote:
Alright then, men still produce 1500 sperm a second.


With less than 10 calories, if that many.

For your claims of it being costly, the human body is extremely efficient at what it does.


Source?
Reactionary rad-trad. Born between 6 and 11 centuries too late. Neocameralist some days, un-constitutional monarchist and neo-Luddite other days. Tolkien enthusiast. Neoreaction/Dark Enlightenment reader.
'Equality is the opposite of quality.'
'I strongly urge you to read Moldbug!'
'I am an excellent proof-reader... after I click submit.'

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Lady Scylla wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:I said "family."


And we can't have a family?


Apparently being raised by a lesbian couple doesn't count as a "family".

Boy, I wonder what they think about single-parent family units.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Lady Scylla
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15673
Founded: Nov 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Lady Scylla » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Knights of Columbia wrote:
Lady Scylla wrote:
Image

Condescending, snarky gifs don't refute my answer.


But they do reflect the facial gymnastics I had.

User avatar
Utceforp
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10328
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Utceforp » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:41 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:She should be imprisoned. Ironically enough, eliminating her genes from the pool would be the best solution.

prison? for not allowing the father a veto?

Lady Scylla wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:Condescending, snarky gifs don't refute my answer.


But they do reflect the facial gymnastics I had.


Look at the guy's flag and name - he's clearly some variety of Fascist. (Or a Fascist in denial.)

There's no point in engaging him, just ignore him.
Last edited by Utceforp on Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Signatures are so 2014.

User avatar
Walrusvylon
Diplomat
 
Posts: 796
Founded: Nov 04, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Walrusvylon » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:42 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Walrusvylon wrote:
Yer a troll

pssst

calling people trolls isn't allowed here. if you think someone is trolling you have to report it in moderation and they will deal with it.


Thank you.
Reactionary rad-trad. Born between 6 and 11 centuries too late. Neocameralist some days, un-constitutional monarchist and neo-Luddite other days. Tolkien enthusiast. Neoreaction/Dark Enlightenment reader.
'Equality is the opposite of quality.'
'I strongly urge you to read Moldbug!'
'I am an excellent proof-reader... after I click submit.'

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:42 pm

Finium wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
the man still has full control over his body.

But we're not really talking about his/her body, this is more of an issue with the genetically recombinated tumor that they could probably both copyright if they wanted.


yes we are.

a woman has the right to control her own body and make her own medical decisions.
whatever

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42342
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:42 pm

Knights of Columbia wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:I have some crazy news for you. Lesbians can raise families too.

I don't believe so. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.

Why does the traditional sense matter. How does two women living together as a married couple prevent them from having a family?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
FelrikTheDeleted
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8949
Founded: Aug 27, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby FelrikTheDeleted » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Knights of Columbia wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:I have some crazy news for you. Lesbians can raise families too.

I don't believe so. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.


The traditional sense? I presume you are referring to the nuclear family model. If so, the traditional model isn't necessarily the best model nor the worst. The same could be said for a family in which isn't traditional.
Last edited by FelrikTheDeleted on Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Knights of Columbia
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Knights of Columbia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Walrusvylon wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:She should be imprisoned. Ironically enough, eliminating her genes from the pool would be the best solution.


Yer a troll

Just because my beliefs make you angry doesn't mean I'm doing it on purpose.

User avatar
Wallenburg
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22872
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Knights of Columbia wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:I have some crazy news for you. Lesbians can raise families too.

I don't believe so. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.

You can believe the Earth is flat and that moss always grows toward civilization for all I care. It doesn't change the facts.
While she had no regrets about throwing the lever to douse her husband's mistress in molten gold, Blanche did feel a pang of conscience for the innocent bystanders whose proximity had caused them to suffer gilt by association.

King of Snark, Real Piece of Work, Metabolizer of Oxygen, Old Man from The East Pacific, by the Malevolence of Her Infinite Terribleness Catherine Gratwick the Sole and True Claimant to the Bears Armed Vacancy, Protector of the Realm

User avatar
Walrusvylon
Diplomat
 
Posts: 796
Founded: Nov 04, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Walrusvylon » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:I don't believe so. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.

Why does the traditional sense matter. How does two women living together as a married couple prevent them from having a family?


It depends on how you define family.
Reactionary rad-trad. Born between 6 and 11 centuries too late. Neocameralist some days, un-constitutional monarchist and neo-Luddite other days. Tolkien enthusiast. Neoreaction/Dark Enlightenment reader.
'Equality is the opposite of quality.'
'I strongly urge you to read Moldbug!'
'I am an excellent proof-reader... after I click submit.'

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Galloism wrote:Then you admit children do not have a right to support from both parents.

If you do not have the strength of your convictions, you should abandon them.

pffft

I am not so rigid that I would let babies die instead of allowing a compassionate law to exist that can save lives.

Then you should support parental relinquishment for both genders - to save lives.

Babies are killed every year by parents who cannot either mentally or financially support their children and have no choice.

It is blatantly hypocritical to support parental relinquishment that in practice can only be used by parents of your preferred gender, in the same way poll tests with grandfather clauses were pure hypocrisy.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Wallenburg wrote:You do not live on Earth, do you?


No. I live on Mars, where men apparently come from.

You literally said that "men have the right to dictate a woman's medical decisions to her".


Show me in writing where I said that. Actually show me the quote where I said "women have the right to dictate a woman's medical decisions to her". I know that someone else asked me a question along those lines to me in an earlier post. Perhaps you got confused?

Really? When?


Genital mutilation happening to both girls and boys. Kinda off topic but it's hard to justify bodily sovereignty given that both young girls and boys are subject to things they cannot consent to.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Finium
Senator
 
Posts: 3849
Founded: Nov 17, 2010
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Finium » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:43 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Finium wrote:But we're not really talking about his/her body, this is more of an issue with the genetically recombinated tumor that they could probably both copyright if they wanted.


yes we are.

a woman has the right to control her own body and make her own medical decisions.

Well, as long as the women buys out the other half of the genes before she liquidates, I suppose it's fine.
big chungus, small among us

User avatar
Knights of Columbia
Attaché
 
Posts: 69
Founded: Feb 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Knights of Columbia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 6:44 pm

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Knights of Columbia wrote:I don't believe so. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.


The traditional sense? I presume you are referring to the nuclear family model. If so, the traditional model isn't necessarily the best model nor is it the worst.

The traditional as in father, mother, children. It's nature's best model for the production and rearing of offspring.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Big Eyed Animation, Eahland, Gun Manufacturers, Ineva, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, Talibanada, The Astral Mandate

Advertisement

Remove ads