BLM leader calls whites "subhumans"

[Cymrea]

Well it's definitely not WND. Never heard of western journalism, and the daily caller is a peice of shit.

Just because the liberal media does not talk about it does not mean it's wrong

Someone posted this pertaining to sources and their biases/leanings. Hopefully it helps here a bit.

[Cymrea]

Let's think of bowl of Smarties, shall we ? Now imagine that one out of ten is laced with cyanide. Would you be willing to take one ?

This Skittles/m&m's/smarties "one rotten apple spoils the bunch" analogy needs to end. I'm so sick of it.

And one out of ten is a gross exaggeration.

[Uiiop]

Just because the liberal media does not talk about it does not mean it's wrong

Someone posted this pertaining to sources and their biases/leanings. Hopefully it helps here a bit.

:/ not a big fan of the design.
While i might not change the ratings it's too horseshoey for me.

[Thermodolia]

Someone posted this pertaining to sources and their biases/leanings. Hopefully it helps here a bit.

:/ not a big fan of the design.
While i might not change the ratings it's too horseshoey for me.

this one is better

[Telconi]

This Skittles/m&m's/smarties "one rotten apple spoils the bunch" analogy needs to end. I'm so sick of it.

And one out of ten is a gross exaggeration.

What's the acceptable level of poison smarties for you to take a handful.

[Saiwania]

Eww... "Supposed to be" Where are the Calvinists when you need them?

I mean it, I will flat out say that there is no such thing as a Black German. There might be a select few Blacks living in Germany on a temporary or semi-permanent basis, but if they're Black- it is obvious that their family doesn't originate in Germany. Germans are a White ethnicity just as Chinese for example, are an Asian ethnicity.

[USS Monitor]

If anything, the Berkeley incident shows that professional trolls should really learn to realize that trolling in real life is not a good idea.

Indeed: it has turned against the Left and now even moderates see them for what they are: terrorists. I can assure you that you have already lost the 2020 elections.

*** Warned for trolling ***

A few of your posts in this thread are borderline, but calling "the Left" terrorists is what put you over the line and got you warned.

[Uiiop]

:/ not a big fan of the design.
While i might not change the ratings it's too horseshoey for me.

this one is better

Not what i meant.
To elaborate my problem is my annoyance with horseshoe theory makes it so it took a bit to notice the difference between "Amount of bias" and "Leaning of bias away from center".
I'm not exactly sure yet there's a difference on those graphs.

[Cymrea]

And one out of ten is a gross exaggeration.

What's the acceptable level of poison smarties for you to take a handful.

One that realistically represents the number of [insert scaremongering du jour] against the rest of the 320 million Americans.

[Brannenstan]

Indeed: it has turned against the Left and now even moderates see them for what they are: terrorists. I can assure you that you have already lost the 2020 elections.

*** Warned for trolling ***

A few of your posts in this thread are borderline, but calling "the Left" terrorists is what put you over the line and got you warned.

I think you missed the context, moderator. The action of the Berkeley protesters, who all agree are extremists, are terroristic and those actions are being associated with the left. With all due respect, this is an argument, not trolling.

[Thermodolia]

this one is better

Not what i meant.
To elaborate my problem is my annoyance with horseshoe theory makes it so it took a bit to notice the difference between "Amount of bias" and "Leaning of bias away from center".
I'm not exactly sure yet there's a difference on those graphs.

I just like the look of one I posted

[Thermodolia]

[warn]Warned for trolling[warn]

A few of your posts in this thread are borderline, but calling "the Left" terrorists is what put you over the line and got you warned.

I think you missed the context, moderator. The action of the Berkeley protesters, who all agree are extremists, are terroristic and those actions are being associated with the left. With all due respect, this is an argument, not trolling.

That can be argued in Moderation not here

[Cymrea]

I think you missed the context, moderator. The action of the Berkeley protesters, who all agree are extremists, are terroristic and those actions are being associated with the left. With all due respect, this is an argument, not trolling.

That can be argued in Moderation not here

Third-party appeals aren't allowed either, IIRC.

[Zhopgrad]

Who wants to go place whites on a cross and Burn them?
It'll be the next thing that becomes socially acceptable in America!

[Thermodolia]

Who wants to go place whites on a cross and Burn them?
It'll be the next thing that becomes socially acceptable in America!

This lady is in Canada, unless something happened in the last 48 hours Canada isn't American

[Mavorpen]

Who wants to go place whites on a cross and Burn them?
It'll be the next thing that becomes socially acceptable in America!

This lady is in Canada, unless something happened in the last 48 hours Canada isn't American

Shh, don't let the Canadians find out.

[Cymrea]

This lady is in Canada, unless something happened in the last 48 hours Canada isn't American

Shh, don't let the Canadians find out.

Toronto really really wants to be New York, though.

[Telconi]

What's the acceptable level of poison smarties for you to take a handful.

One that realistically represents the number of [insert scaremongering du jour] against the rest of the 320 million Americans.

I think you misunderstood. Regardless of what ratio is in fact realistic, I ask what is your personal breaking point. At what concentration does the individual spoil the collective? If 1/100 BLM members were racial supremacists, would you disavow the organization as a whole? 1/1,000? 1/100,000? Etc.

[Rodez]

:/ not a big fan of the design.
While i might not change the ratings it's too horseshoey for me.

this one is better

>Not putting Salon in the red.

[Cymrea]

One that realistically represents the number of [insert scaremongering du jour] against the rest of the 320 million Americans.

I think you misunderstood. Regardless of what ratio is in fact realistic, I ask what is your personal breaking point. At what concentration does the individual spoil the collective? If 1/100 BLM members were racial supremacists, would you disavow the organization as a whole? 1/1,000? 1/100,000? Etc.

The poisoned Skittles reference was in the context of immigrants being terrorists, originally, and made barely any sense to begin with. Further I think such a simplistic meme fails to account for the complexity of the issues regarding BLM, immigration, terrorism, et cetera.

My personal threshold would require a great deal more information than a largely arbitrary number of candies. In the particular context of BLM, it's difficult to answer because BLM is not well defined at all. What definition of BLM would we be debating?

[Ethel mermania]

I think you missed the context, moderator. The action of the Berkeley protesters, who all agree are extremists, are terroristic and those actions are being associated with the left. With all due respect, this is an argument, not trolling.

That can be argued in Moderation not here

Not by a third party it cant.

[Telconi]

I think you misunderstood. Regardless of what ratio is in fact realistic, I ask what is your personal breaking point. At what concentration does the individual spoil the collective? If 1/100 BLM members were racial supremacists, would you disavow the organization as a whole? 1/1,000? 1/100,000? Etc.

The poisoned Skittles reference was in the context of immigrants being terrorists, originally, and made barely any sense to begin with. Further I think such a simplistic meme fails to account for the complexity of the issues regarding BLM, immigration, terrorism, et cetera.

My personal threshold would require a great deal more information than a largely arbitrary number of candies. In the particular context of BLM, it's difficult to answer because BLM is not well defined at all. What definition of BLM would we be debating?

For the sake of this example let us define "BLM" as anyone who publicly decares loyalty or membership to Black Lives Matter or a local division/chapter of Black Lives Matter. As for the various issues at play, those are relevant, but must be weighed and measured by you.

[Imperializt Russia]

No it isn't the "actual tidal wave" of the left. Also why the fuck do you capitalize the "L"? Most of those are from shity blogs and shity newspapers that shouldn't be called news, and the New Yorker is mostly satire.

1. It very much is. And we have seen this again and again in all the liberal media. Hell even CNN joins in the chorus.

2. This is why.

Let's be frank here: the Left is demonising an entire race of people.

Spoiler alert, the majority of people who would consider themselves "left" are white.

[Zhopgrad]

Who wants to go place whites on a cross and Burn them?
It'll be the next thing that becomes socially acceptable in America!

This lady is in Canada, unless something happened in the last 48 hours Canada isn't American

Well in that case, North America.

[UCE Watchdog of the Puppets]

The poisoned Skittles reference was in the context of immigrants being terrorists, originally, and made barely any sense to begin with. Further I think such a simplistic meme fails to account for the complexity of the issues regarding BLM, immigration, terrorism, et cetera.

My personal threshold would require a great deal more information than a largely arbitrary number of candies. In the particular context of BLM, it's difficult to answer because BLM is not well defined at all. What definition of BLM would we be debating?

For the sake of this example let us define "BLM" as anyone who publicly decares loyalty or membership to Black Lives Matter or a local division/chapter of Black Lives Matter. As for the various issues at play, those are relevant, but must be weighed and measured by you.

BLM is a worthless brand name.

1. It very much is. And we have seen this again and again in all the liberal media. Hell even CNN joins in the chorus.

2. This is why.

Let's be frank here: the Left is demonising an entire race of people.

Spoiler alert, the majority of people who would consider themselves "left" are white.

Then they're self-hating Leftist whites.