BLM leader calls whites "subhumans"

[Thermodolia]

Anarchists existed before the term SJW became a thing. There's no possible way anarchists are rebranding themselves from something that came after the brand anarchist.

They just became even more violent and are now on campuses too. This is what you get when you allow the Left to infiltrate universities.

Why do I get the feeling that you think the left wing is Satan re-incarnate while the right wing is a little cherub?

[Mavorpen]

That's nice, but this has nothing to do with my post.

It has everything to do with it. I find it funny though that I haven't heard anyone of you condemn left-wing violence or even this BLM speech -- but you find it insulting that I consider the Left guilty by association.

No, it has nothing to do with it. I pointed out the impossibility for this "rebranding" nonsense and then you started rambling about anarchists being violent on campuses. There isn't any connection between these two points.

[Thermodolia]

Jacobins and Marxists are to very different groups much like how the Nazis and Facists are very different groups.

When you can't formulate a legitimate argument, just generalize entire groups by tossing labels at them that don't fit.

I really feel bad for their history teacher

[Free Tristania]

They just became even more violent and are now on campuses too. This is what you get when you allow the Left to infiltrate universities.

Why do I get the feeling that you think the left wing is Satan re-incarnate while the right wing is a little cherub?

Again: thank you for showing my whole argument to be correct. I don't see you people condemn the violence. And that makes you guilty by association. I am just playing your game, guys.

[Free Tristania]

So when did Neo-Nazi's beat up people in a city after their candidate lost the elections ?

Your question was about "right-wing SJW[s] beating up opponents and approving of speech that puts an entire race of people away as nothing short of Untermenschen"
Disregarding the nonsensical use of SJW here, are you gonna deny that neo-nazis do this?

Besides, I doubt any of the type of people to form a black bloc would vote hillary (ie, their candidate didn't lose the elections, because they didn't have one)

Example. If anything it's the Left that is behaving like Nazi's.

[Thermodolia]

That's nice, but this has nothing to do with my post.

It has everything to do with it. I find it funny though that I haven't heard anyone of you condemn left-wing violence or even this BLM speech -- but you find it insulting that I consider the Left guilty by association.

Um then you haven't looked hard enough. Again I point you to the three times that I posted about how BLM Toronto is a racist hate group

[Free Tristania]

It has everything to do with it. I find it funny though that I haven't heard anyone of you condemn left-wing violence or even this BLM speech -- but you find it insulting that I consider the Left guilty by association.

Um then you haven't looked hard enough. Again I point you to the three times that I posted about how BLM Toronto is a racist hate group

But at the same time - you point at the right and you deny the hateful articles posted by your preferred group, articles that create this climate.

[Uiiop]

Why do I get the feeling that you think the left wing is Satan re-incarnate while the right wing is a little cherub?

Again: thank you for showing my whole argument to be correct. I don't see you people condemn the violence. And that makes you guilty by association. I am just playing your game, guys.

But she is the co-founder of the Toronto sect, so you can say that BLM is not racist, however the Toronto group must be

The BLM Toronto most definitely is racist

It almost sounds like mediocre satire.

I award you no points for your assumptions.

If the OP is legit then it's stupid as hell.
Also Riots suck.

[Thermodolia]

Why do I get the feeling that you think the left wing is Satan re-incarnate while the right wing is a little cherub?

Again: thank you for showing my whole argument to be correct. I don't see you people condemn the violence. And that makes you guilty by association. I am just playing your game, guys.

Or you really don't want to admit that you were wrong

It has everything to do with it. I find it funny though that I haven't heard anyone of you condemn left-wing violence or even this BLM speech -- but you find it insulting that I consider the Left guilty by association.

Um then you haven't looked hard enough. Again I point you to the three times that I posted about how BLM Toronto is a racist hate group

[The Grene Knyght]

Your question was about "right-wing SJW[s] beating up opponents and approving of speech that puts an entire race of people away as nothing short of Untermenschen"
Disregarding the nonsensical use of SJW here, are you gonna deny that neo-nazis do this?

Besides, I doubt any of the type of people to form a black bloc would vote hillary (ie, their candidate didn't lose the elections, because they didn't have one)

Example. If anything it's the Left that is behaving like Nazi's.

What do you want an example of?
Neo-nazis approving of racist speeches? or Neo-nazis beating people up?
Do you really believe these two things happen so rarely that you want an example of them happening at all?

[Mavorpen]

Again: thank you for showing my whole argument to be correct. I don't see you people condemn the violence. And that makes you guilty by association. I am just playing your game, guys.

Or you really don't want to admit that you were wrong

Um then you haven't looked hard enough. Again I point you to the three times that I posted about how BLM Toronto is a racist hate group

Reading? What's that?

[Thermodolia]

Um then you haven't looked hard enough. Again I point you to the three times that I posted about how BLM Toronto is a racist hate group

But at the same time - you point at the right and you deny the hateful articles posted by your preferred group, articles that create this climate.

I don't deny them I just say that they aren't the entirety of the left wing, just as the alt right isn't the entirety of the right wing

[Luminesa]

We're speaking about today: it wouldn't be the first time the Left re-branded itself by the way (but always with the same outcome). First they called them Jacobins and then they became the Marxists.

Jacobins and Marxists are to very different groups much like how the Nazis and Facists are very different groups.

Jacobins, for example, rabidly celebrated the self and individual reason. Marxists celebrate...well, communism, and the importance of the community above everything.

[Mavorpen]

But at the same time - you point at the right and you deny the hateful articles posted by your preferred group, articles that create this climate.

I don't deny them I just say that they aren't the entirety of the left wing, just as the alt right isn't the entirety of the right wing

I like how he keeps repeating, "I'm playing your game," and insinuating that you've ever generalized the right and tried to poison the well, when you've repeatedly done otherwise in the most explicit ways possible.

[Mavorpen]

Jacobins and Marxists are to very different groups much like how the Nazis and Facists are very different groups.

Jacobins, for example, rabidly celebrated the self and individual reason. Marxists celebrate...well, communism, and the importance of the community above everything.

Not really. Marxism focuses heavily on personal freedom.

[Uiiop]

I don't deny them I just say that they aren't the entirety of the left wing, just as the alt right isn't the entirety of the right wing

I like how he keeps repeating, "I'm playing your game," and insinuating that you've ever generalized the right and tried to poison the well, when you've repeatedly done otherwise in the most explicit ways possible.

But...but one of the other posters did...you must be the same right?

[Thermodolia]

I like how he keeps repeating, "I'm playing your game," and insinuating that you've ever generalized the right and tried to poison the well, when you've repeatedly done otherwise in the most explicit ways possible.

But...but one of the other posters did...you must be the same right?

Apparently we are a hive mind

[Thermodolia]

I don't deny them I just say that they aren't the entirety of the left wing, just as the alt right isn't the entirety of the right wing

I like how he keeps repeating, "I'm playing your game," and insinuating that you've ever generalized the right and tried to poison the well, when you've repeatedly done otherwise in the most explicit ways possible.

Ya if they where actually "playing my game" they would have said that both sides have assholes.

[Mavorpen]

But...but one of the other posters did...you must be the same right?

Apparently we are a hive mind

It's why various groups of communists are always fighting over who has the One True Communist™ ideology.*nods*

[Kravanica]

Nope.
BLM Toronto have to discredit her, otherwise they're racists like her.

Failure to condemn =/= support.

So can we stop calling Trump racist for not denouncing David Duke, then?

[Thermodolia]

Failure to condemn =/= support.

So can we stop calling Trump racist for not denouncing David Duke, then?

Well I disagree. Failure to condemn shows that they at the very least think it's completely fine to spout shush racist ideas, let alone support it.

[Mavorpen]

Failure to condemn =/= support.

So can we stop calling Trump racist for not denouncing David Duke, then?

Completely missing the nuance there. He's stating that the two aren't inherently equivalent. It depends on the circumstance. Most people don't know about this "BLM leader" making these comments, so they can't be held accountable.

Trump, however, was actively and repeatedly asked about it.

[Brkelgarozed]

First what is source?
And look more sources:http://www.westernjournalism.com/milwaukee-mobs-attack-whites-in-response-to-police-shooting-of-armed-suspect/ http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/14/milwa ... tes-video/

Well it's definitely not WND. Never heard of western journalism, and the daily caller is a peice of shit.

Just because the liberal media does not talk about it does not mean it's wrong

[Catochristoferson]

Not everyone on the left is. Though admittedly many are, and there are plenty of racist extremists on the left. But that does not mean all are.

Let's think of bowl of Smarties, shall we ? Now imagine that one out of ten is laced with cyanide. Would you be willing to take one ?

This Skittles/m&m's/smarties "one rotten apple spoils the bunch" analogy needs to end. I'm so sick of it.

[Thermodolia]

Well it's definitely not WND. Never heard of western journalism, and the daily caller is a peice of shit.

Just because the liberal media does not talk about it does not mean it's wrong

That's not what I said. I'd be more likely to believe it if it came from Fox News, National Review, or RedState than those places