NATION

PASSWORD

BLM leader calls whites "subhumans"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:09 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Whether or not you agree if the instance was a hate crime, I don't think anyone in that interview was implying in anyway that "certain lives do not matter."

Horseshoe theory? Really? I think the world is a touch more complex than that, wouldn't you agree?

Doesn't that apply to the right? Or virtually any group/organisation of any sort?



1. Clearly it does. One standard for one and one for the other. That shows that one group matters more than the other. Imagine five Trump supporters beating up a black kid. Yes.. that would have been a hate crime, right ?

2. Not really -- there is no real difference between the two. The Left can deny all it wants.

3. It applies to any group of totalitarian idiots. But at least the guns of the Right aren't pointing at me and that, for me, makes a real difference.

3. So as long as you are ok everything is fine? How noble of you
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:10 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:Tell me more about right-wing SJW beating up opponents and approving of speech that puts an entire race of people away as nothing short of Untermenschen.

What are you talking about?

You know very well what I mean:

SJW destroying an entire city centre because they didn't get their way.. and the Left now defending BLM. Again: Name. One. Example. On. The. Right.
Last edited by Free Tristania on Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:11 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:

1. Clearly it does. One standard for one and one for the other. That shows that one group matters more than the other. Imagine five Trump supporters beating up a black kid. Yes.. that would have been a hate crime, right ?

2. Not really -- there is no real difference between the two. The Left can deny all it wants.

3. It applies to any group of totalitarian idiots. But at least the guns of the Right aren't pointing at me and that, for me, makes a real difference.

3. So as long as you are ok everything is fine? How noble of you

Being noble doesn't work. That;s something the Left has shown for all those wanting to see it.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:11 pm

The Grene Knyght wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:Tell me more about right-wing SJW beating up opponents and approving of speech that puts an entire race of people away as nothing short of Untermenschen.

Did you mean: Neo-Nazis?

So when did Neo-Nazi's beat up people in a city after their candidate lost the elections ?
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:11 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:What are you talking about?

You know very well what I mean:

SJW destroying an entire city centre because they didn't get their way.. and the Left now defending BLM. Again: Name. One. Example. On. The. Right.

Is "SJW" just a placeholder for anything you don't like? Because, those people were anarchists. I have no idea how you come to the conclusion that anarcists are "SJWs".
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:12 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:You know very well what I mean:

SJW destroying an entire city centre because they didn't get their way.. and the Left now defending BLM. Again: Name. One. Example. On. The. Right.

Is "SJW" just a placeholder for anything you don't like? Because, those people were anarchists. I have no idea how you come to the conclusion that anarcists are "SJWs".

Same goo, different wrapper. They just name themselves differently but in ideology and goals they are exactly the same.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3263
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:13 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Did you mean: Neo-Nazis?

So when did Neo-Nazi's beat up people in a city after their candidate lost the elections ?

you put those goal-posts back where you found them, or you're grounded!
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7157
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:13 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Is "SJW" just a placeholder for anything you don't like? Because, those people were anarchists. I have no idea how you come to the conclusion that anarcists are "SJWs".

Same goo, different wrapper. They just name themselves differently but in ideology and goals they are exactly the same.

Assholes are assholes but that isn't how it works at all.
I'm sure there's a difference between those who don't want a state and those who do.
Let me ask you this....what were the chances of any of these "guns" to actually get political power?
Last edited by Uiiop on Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:13 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Is "SJW" just a placeholder for anything you don't like? Because, those people were anarchists. I have no idea how you come to the conclusion that anarcists are "SJWs".

Same goo, different wrapper. They just name themselves differently but in ideology and goals they are exactly the same.

So...you think that certain individuals in the 18th century were called SJWs and they decided to rebrand themselves as anarchists?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60405
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Luminesa » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:14 pm

Hoppean Snake wrote:
Montferret wrote:Stupid black whore.

What blacks created in contrast to whites? Where they go, violence, rape, filth, fatherless kids, Boko Harams, corruption, illiteracy and degenerate art and music ensue.

Id is a scientifically proven FACT THAT black people are mentally less developed than whites.

We can't @ll be treated equally if the races aren't equal.

Source?
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:15 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:Same goo, different wrapper. They just name themselves differently but in ideology and goals they are exactly the same.

So...you think that certain individuals in the 18th century were called SJWs and they decided to rebrand themselves as anarchists?

We're speaking about today: it wouldn't be the first time the Left re-branded itself by the way (but always with the same outcome). First they called them Jacobins and then they became the Marxists.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Luminesa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60405
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Luminesa » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:16 pm

Vassenor wrote:
White Union Leader wrote:Many white people are murdered by the police too. Why must black people prioritise over other races? Why are they just called Black Lives Matter?


Because when a white person is killed by police it doesn't tend to get written off and buried.

I don't think anyone wrote-off Michael Brown's death and buried it.
Catholic, pro-life, and proud of it. I prefer my debates on religion, politics, and sports with some coffee and a little Aquinas and G.K. CHESTERTON here and there. :3
Unofficial #1 fan of the Who Dat Nation.
"I'm just a singer of simple songs, I'm not a real political man. I watch CNN, but I'm not sure I can tell you the difference in Iraq and Iran. But I know Jesus, and I talk to God, and I remember this from when I was young:
faith, hope and love are some good things He gave us...
and the greatest is love."
-Alan Jackson
Help the Ukrainian people, here's some sources!
Help bring home First Nation girls! Now with more ways to help!
Jesus loves all of His children in Eastern Europe - pray for peace.
Pray for Ukraine, Wear Sunflowers In Your Hair

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:16 pm

Hoppean Snake wrote:
Montferret wrote:Stupid black whore.

What blacks created in contrast to whites? Where they go, violence, rape, filth, fatherless kids, Boko Harams, corruption, illiteracy and degenerate art and music ensue.

Id is a scientifically proven FACT THAT black people are mentally less developed than whites.

We can't @ll be treated equally if the races aren't equal.

Interesting idea ("cough cough"). But.... do you have anything to source that ? You know.. not Richard Lynn.
Last edited by Free Tristania on Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:16 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:What are you talking about?

You know very well what I mean:

SJW destroying an entire city centre because they didn't get their way.. and the Left now defending BLM. Again: Name. One. Example. On. The. Right.

It's one asshole in the BLM the entire BLM and the entire left-wing is not responsible for the actions of one racist dumbass as much as the entire Republican Party is because of a few republican racist assholes
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:16 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So...you think that certain individuals in the 18th century were called SJWs and they decided to rebrand themselves as anarchists?

We're speaking about today: it wouldn't be the first time the Left re-branded itself by the way (but always with the same outcome). First they called them Jacobins and then they became the Marxists.

Anarchists existed before the term SJW became a thing. There's no possible way anarchists are rebranding themselves from something that came after the brand anarchist.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:17 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Did you mean: Neo-Nazis?

So when did Neo-Nazi's beat up people in a city after their candidate lost the elections ?

Several occasions.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:17 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:So when did Neo-Nazi's beat up people in a city after their candidate lost the elections ?

Several occasions.

Name one.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7157
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:17 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:You know very well what I mean:

SJW destroying an entire city centre because they didn't get their way.. and the Left now defending BLM. Again: Name. One. Example. On. The. Right.

It's one asshole in the BLM the entire BLM and the entire left-wing is not responsible for the actions of one racist dumbass as much as the entire Republican Party is because of a few republican racist assholes

But the assholes are always the ones who take power man....Continue the Asshole Olympics! :p
Last edited by Uiiop on Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:18 pm

Luminesa wrote:
Hoppean Snake wrote:Id is a scientifically proven FACT THAT black people are mentally less developed than whites.

We can't @ll be treated equally if the races aren't equal.

Source?

Stormfront probably
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:18 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:We're speaking about today: it wouldn't be the first time the Left re-branded itself by the way (but always with the same outcome). First they called them Jacobins and then they became the Marxists.

Anarchists existed before the term SJW became a thing. There's no possible way anarchists are rebranding themselves from something that came after the brand anarchist.

They just became even more violent and are now on campuses too. This is what you get when you allow the Left to infiltrate universities.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:19 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:So...you think that certain individuals in the 18th century were called SJWs and they decided to rebrand themselves as anarchists?

We're speaking about today: it wouldn't be the first time the Left re-branded itself by the way (but always with the same outcome). First they called them Jacobins and then they became the Marxists.

Jacobins and Marxists are to very different groups much like how the Nazis and Facists are very different groups.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:19 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Anarchists existed before the term SJW became a thing. There's no possible way anarchists are rebranding themselves from something that came after the brand anarchist.

They just became even more violent and are now on campuses too. This is what you get when you allow the Left to infiltrate universities.

That's nice, but this has nothing to do with my post.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:20 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:We're speaking about today: it wouldn't be the first time the Left re-branded itself by the way (but always with the same outcome). First they called them Jacobins and then they became the Marxists.

Jacobins and Marxists are to very different groups much like how the Nazis and Facists are very different groups.

When you can't formulate a legitimate argument, just generalize entire groups by tossing labels at them that don't fit.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Free Tristania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8194
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Tristania » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:21 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Free Tristania wrote:They just became even more violent and are now on campuses too. This is what you get when you allow the Left to infiltrate universities.

That's nice, but this has nothing to do with my post.

It has everything to do with it. I find it funny though that I haven't heard anyone of you condemn left-wing violence or even this BLM speech -- but you find it insulting that I consider the Left guilty by association.
Pro: True Liberty, Voluntary association, Free Trade, Family and Tradition as the Bedrock of Society
Anti: Centralisation (of any sort), Feminism, Internationalism, Multiculturalism, Collectivism of any sort (be it Left-wing or Right-wing)

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3263
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Tue Feb 14, 2017 1:22 pm

Free Tristania wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:Did you mean: Neo-Nazis?

So when did Neo-Nazi's beat up people in a city after their candidate lost the elections ?

Your question was about "right-wing SJW[s] beating up opponents and approving of speech that puts an entire race of people away as nothing short of Untermenschen"
Disregarding the nonsensical use of SJW here, are you gonna deny that neo-nazis do this?

Besides, I doubt any of the type of people to form a black bloc would vote hillary (ie, their candidate didn't lose the elections, because they didn't have one)
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Cachard Calia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Floofybit, Grinning Dragon, In-dia, Port Caverton, Saor Alba, Spirit of Hope

Advertisement

Remove ads