No, it justifies the protest. I don't think anyone here (from what I read) is attempting to justify a riot.
Advertisement

by Minzerland II » Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:31 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Republic of Canador » Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:32 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Arumbia67 wrote:Going to an event being held by someone you hate, thus getting more attention (doubly so if it gets shut down) Isn't really an intelligent thing to do. Just ignore them. He hasn't hurt anybody.
Except for those trans students he outed, while they were sat in the audience, and he livestreamed him doing it.
But whatever, no-one cares about them.
Lichian wrote:Don't go. Stay at home. If forced to go, pray that you don't mess up. Pray that the government doesn't see you. And pray that you don't just end up getting shot for fun.

by Gauthier » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:04 am
Thunder Place wrote:What Milo and his ilk are trying to do in this country is far more authoritarian than anything the leftists are doing to stop them.

by Socialist Tera » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:04 am

by Gauthier » Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:05 am
Socialist Tera wrote:Free speech only seems to applies to people when the ruling party agrees with it. I wouldn't be surprised if BLM becomes labelled as a terrorist group by the Republican government soon.

by Costa Fierro » Sat Feb 04, 2017 1:36 am
Gauthier wrote:Thunder Place wrote:What Milo and his ilk are trying to do in this country is far more authoritarian than anything the leftists are doing to stop them.
Yannoupoulos is like so many fictional mad scientists, so determined to carry out his agenda he doesn't even bother to wonder if when all is said and done he'd be the next to line up in the crosshairs for the agenda.

by I didnt vote for Trump » Sat Feb 04, 2017 3:18 am


by Hexgard » Sat Feb 04, 2017 3:26 am
I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Jeez, looks like a lot of people seem to disagree here but I didn't think the concept of freedom of speech was supposed to apply to incoherent chanting and physical violence in order to drown out the words of somebody else. Not a lot of people seem to realise that the word "speech" in "freedom of speech" actually refers to expressing an opinion, not making noise.
All the protesters needed to do was stand or sit near the front of the building and voice their opinion in a sensibly intellectual manner. Their insistence on doubling down on crazy just created a whole new wave of videos that are going to flood bookface and reddit, reaching out to the lowest common denominator about the evil leftists burning buildings and bashing those they disagree with. Practically handing your executioner his ammunition at this point. I can guarantee a video about "leftists gathering to listen to speaker outside brietbart editor speak" is going to attract a lot less hits.

by Vassenor » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:28 am

by Vassenor » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:30 am
I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Jeez, looks like a lot of people seem to disagree here but I didn't think the concept of freedom of speech was supposed to apply to incoherent chanting and physical violence in order to drown out the words of somebody else. Not a lot of people seem to realise that the word "speech" in "freedom of speech" actually refers to expressing an opinion, not making noise.
All the protesters needed to do was stand or sit near the front of the building and voice their opinion in a sensibly intellectual manner. Their insistence on doubling down on crazy just created a whole new wave of videos that are going to flood bookface and reddit, reaching out to the lowest common denominator about the evil leftists burning buildings and bashing those they disagree with. Practically handing your executioner his ammunition at this point. I can guarantee a video about "leftists gathering to listen to speaker outside brietbart editor speak" is going to attract a lot less hits.
The violence was instigated by a group of about 150 masked agitators who came onto campus and interrupted an otherwise non-violent protest.

by I didnt vote for Trump » Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:41 am
Vassenor wrote:I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Jeez, looks like a lot of people seem to disagree here but I didn't think the concept of freedom of speech was supposed to apply to incoherent chanting and physical violence in order to drown out the words of somebody else. Not a lot of people seem to realise that the word "speech" in "freedom of speech" actually refers to expressing an opinion, not making noise.
All the protesters needed to do was stand or sit near the front of the building and voice their opinion in a sensibly intellectual manner. Their insistence on doubling down on crazy just created a whole new wave of videos that are going to flood bookface and reddit, reaching out to the lowest common denominator about the evil leftists burning buildings and bashing those they disagree with. Practically handing your executioner his ammunition at this point. I can guarantee a video about "leftists gathering to listen to speaker outside brietbart editor speak" is going to attract a lot less hits.
http://news.berkeley.edu/2017/02/01/yia ... -canceled/The violence was instigated by a group of about 150 masked agitators who came onto campus and interrupted an otherwise non-violent protest.
So yeah, they were pretty content to do that.

by Grave_n_idle » Sat Feb 04, 2017 6:04 am
I didnt vote for Trump wrote:At some point people are going to have to wake up and realise that "we didn't invite them, they weren't part of out protest" isn't a bird that's going to keep flying when this occurrence happens again, and again, and again.

by Imperializt Russia » Sat Feb 04, 2017 7:45 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Imperializt Russia » Sat Feb 04, 2017 7:50 am
Republic of Canador wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:Except for those trans students he outed, while they were sat in the audience, and he livestreamed him doing it.
But whatever, no-one cares about them.
Except he didn't hurt them.
Unless you are talking about "feelings", at which point you're being ridiculous.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Gauthier » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:01 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Gauthier wrote:Yannoupoulos is like so many fictional mad scientists, so determined to carry out his agenda he doesn't even bother to wonder if when all is said and done he'd be the next to line up in the crosshairs for the agenda.
So Yiannoupoulos is not some attention whore but an evil personality hellbent on world domination?

by Ethel mermania » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:08 am
Vassenor wrote:I didnt vote for Trump wrote:Jeez, looks like a lot of people seem to disagree here but I didn't think the concept of freedom of speech was supposed to apply to incoherent chanting and physical violence in order to drown out the words of somebody else. Not a lot of people seem to realise that the word "speech" in "freedom of speech" actually refers to expressing an opinion, not making noise.
All the protesters needed to do was stand or sit near the front of the building and voice their opinion in a sensibly intellectual manner. Their insistence on doubling down on crazy just created a whole new wave of videos that are going to flood bookface and reddit, reaching out to the lowest common denominator about the evil leftists burning buildings and bashing those they disagree with. Practically handing your executioner his ammunition at this point. I can guarantee a video about "leftists gathering to listen to speaker outside brietbart editor speak" is going to attract a lot less hits.
http://news.berkeley.edu/2017/02/01/yia ... -canceled/The violence was instigated by a group of about 150 masked agitators who came onto campus and interrupted an otherwise non-violent protest.
So yeah, they were pretty content to do that.

by Corrian » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:20 am
I didnt vote for Trump wrote:At some point people are going to have to wake up and realise that "we didn't invite them, they weren't part of out protest" isn't a bird that's going to keep flying when this occurrence happens again, and again, and again.

by Ethel mermania » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:23 am
Corrian wrote:I didnt vote for Trump wrote:At some point people are going to have to wake up and realise that "we didn't invite them, they weren't part of out protest" isn't a bird that's going to keep flying when this occurrence happens again, and again, and again.
What are we supposed to do? Riot back to stop the rioters?

by Corrian » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:29 am

by Corrian » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:36 am

by Gauthier » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:39 am
Corrian wrote:Jesus Christ

by Corrian » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:40 am
Gauthier wrote:Corrian wrote:Jesus Christ
"It Was Just A Joke" or "My Comment Was Taken Out Of Context" in 3... 2... 1...

by Ethel mermania » Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 am
Corrian wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:
the police are suppose to do their job and arrest them.
That has nothing to do with the fact it seems implied that us saying we didn't invite them won't fly. What else are WE supposed to do, as protesters? Better we disown them then say nothing, but apparently nothing we do is satisfactory.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, El Lazaro, EuroStralia, Name 0, New Cheeselandia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Southland, TheKeyToJoy, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement