Cymrea wrote:From the CBS Pittsburgh report: "Additionally, at the National Prayer Breakfast, Trump said religious freedom is a 'scared right,'"
Typo for sacred, yes. And also the most remarkable of Freudian slips.
This is my nightmare come to life
Advertisement

by Thermodolia » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:56 am
Cymrea wrote:From the CBS Pittsburgh report: "Additionally, at the National Prayer Breakfast, Trump said religious freedom is a 'scared right,'"
Typo for sacred, yes. And also the most remarkable of Freudian slips.

by Thermodolia » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:57 am
Aelex wrote:Gauthier wrote:Nothing like another years long Police Action that produces vets fucked up by physical and psychological trauma. How did the last one go? Oh right...
>Implying Mexicans would mind being occupied by the U.S when the majority is actually trying to smuggle themselves past the border.
I mean, if anything, they would probably be happy about it. They get everything they wanted and in top of that they don't even need to move anymore. :^)

by Mefpan » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:58 am
Geilinor wrote:Trump had a disastrous conversation with the prime minister of Australia. If he can't even talk with our closest allies without losing his mind, what's going to happen?

by The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:58 am
Tsaraine wrote:Nazis aren't known for their smarts. You don't adhere to an ideology that got flattened under a T-34 in 1945 if you're full of sparks and opportunities in life.
Caelestiam wrote:...wait,
Are we seriously in a dick measuring contest over who has the right to declare law by virtue of the most innocent dead?
Sounds horrible and insensitive.
Proceed.

by Gauthier » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:59 am
Thermodolia wrote:Aelex wrote:>Implying Mexicans would mind being occupied by the U.S when the majority is actually trying to smuggle themselves past the border.
I mean, if anything, they would probably be happy about it. They get everything they wanted and in top of that they don't even need to move anymore. :^)
The majority of Mexico isn't coming across the border

by Thermodolia » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:59 am

by Cymrea » Thu Feb 02, 2017 10:59 am

by Rio Cana » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:00 am
Aelex wrote:Gauthier wrote:Nothing like another years long Police Action that produces vets fucked up by physical and psychological trauma. How did the last one go? Oh right...
>Implying Mexicans would mind being occupied by the U.S when the majority is actually trying to smuggle themselves past the border.
I mean, if anything, they would probably be happy about it. They get everything they wanted and in top of that they don't even need to move anymore. :^)

by Gauthier » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:01 am

by The East Marches » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:01 am

by The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:01 am
Tsaraine wrote:Nazis aren't known for their smarts. You don't adhere to an ideology that got flattened under a T-34 in 1945 if you're full of sparks and opportunities in life.
Caelestiam wrote:...wait,
Are we seriously in a dick measuring contest over who has the right to declare law by virtue of the most innocent dead?
Sounds horrible and insensitive.
Proceed.

by Lady Scylla » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:02 am
Mefpan wrote:Geilinor wrote:Trump had a disastrous conversation with the prime minister of Australia. If he can't even talk with our closest allies without losing his mind, what's going to happen?
So, this is a news outlet saying Trump got into an argument with the leader of an allied nation according to other, unnamed news outlets regarding a demand to honor an alleged deal that'd violate what he ran for office with?

by The East Marches » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:03 am
Lady Scylla wrote:Mefpan wrote:So, this is a news outlet saying Trump got into an argument with the leader of an allied nation according to other, unnamed news outlets regarding a demand to honor an alleged deal that'd violate what he ran for office with?
By that logic, why have treaties at all? In fact, let's let the US breakup into 50 states. It was a deal before Trump's presidency.

by Flarbinia » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:03 am
Pimps Inc wrote:He threatened to send troops into Mexico to "fight narco-traffickers". That's it. Trump is an idiot in world politics. It's one idiotic thing to ban people from countries in civil war or that we have military intervention in, but to threaten to invade a regional ally and neighbor?

by Geilinor » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:03 am
Mefpan wrote:Geilinor wrote:Trump had a disastrous conversation with the prime minister of Australia. If he can't even talk with our closest allies without losing his mind, what's going to happen?
So, this is a news outlet saying Trump got into an argument with the leader of an allied nation according to other, unnamed news outlets regarding a demand to honor an alleged deal that'd violate what he ran for office with?

by Balkenreich » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:04 am
Aelex wrote:Gauthier wrote:Nothing like another years long Police Action that produces vets fucked up by physical and psychological trauma. How did the last one go? Oh right...
>Implying Mexicans would mind being occupied by the U.S when the majority is actually trying to smuggle themselves past the border.
I mean, if anything, they would probably be happy about it. They get everything they wanted and in top of that they don't even need to move anymore. :^)

by Thermodolia » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:04 am

by Lady Scylla » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:04 am
Flarbinia wrote:Pimps Inc wrote:He threatened to send troops into Mexico to "fight narco-traffickers". That's it. Trump is an idiot in world politics. It's one idiotic thing to ban people from countries in civil war or that we have military intervention in, but to threaten to invade a regional ally and neighbor?
The message of the alleged threat was very clear: if Mexico can't clean up its mess and get its shit together, then America is going to have to fix the problem.

by The East Marches » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:05 am

by Cymrea » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:05 am
Flarbinia wrote:Pimps Inc wrote:He threatened to send troops into Mexico to "fight narco-traffickers". That's it. Trump is an idiot in world politics. It's one idiotic thing to ban people from countries in civil war or that we have military intervention in, but to threaten to invade a regional ally and neighbor?
The message of the alleged threat was very clear: if Mexico can't clean up its mess and get its shit together, then America is going to have to fix the problem.

by Balkenreich » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:05 am

by Thermodolia » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:05 am
Flarbinia wrote:Pimps Inc wrote:He threatened to send troops into Mexico to "fight narco-traffickers". That's it. Trump is an idiot in world politics. It's one idiotic thing to ban people from countries in civil war or that we have military intervention in, but to threaten to invade a regional ally and neighbor?
The message of the alleged threat was very clear: if Mexico can't clean up its mess and get its shit together, then America is going to have to fix the problem.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:05 am
Flarbinia wrote:Pimps Inc wrote:He threatened to send troops into Mexico to "fight narco-traffickers". That's it. Trump is an idiot in world politics. It's one idiotic thing to ban people from countries in civil war or that we have military intervention in, but to threaten to invade a regional ally and neighbor?
The message of the alleged threat was very clear: if Mexico can't clean up its mess and get its shit together, then America is going to have to fix the problem.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.


by Mefpan » Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:06 am
Lady Scylla wrote:Mefpan wrote:So, this is a news outlet saying Trump got into an argument with the leader of an allied nation according to other, unnamed news outlets regarding a demand to honor an alleged deal that'd violate what he ran for office with?
By that logic, why have treaties at all? In fact, let's let the US breakup into 50 states. It was a deal before Trump's presidency.
Geilinor wrote:Mefpan wrote:So, this is a news outlet saying Trump got into an argument with the leader of an allied nation according to other, unnamed news outlets regarding a demand to honor an alleged deal that'd violate what he ran for office with?
You don't cut the call off early just because someone disagrees with you.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kitsuva, Necroghastia, Umeria, Warvick, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement