Trump MAGAThread IV: Twixt Scylla & Some Bad Hombres

by **New haven america** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:52 pm

Kravanica wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
No you haven't. The comparison is simple minded at best.

Somehow it seems quite accurate. They are both propagandists. Hannity just has better hair.

Funny how you make these propagandist accusations, even though she consistantly reaches out to Right-wing government officials and reporters and tries to remain as unbiased as possible.

But that would require actual effort and go against "Teh Ebil Left!" narrative that most Right-wing and Libertarians have, and we know certain people on this site have problems with that...

by **Thermodolia** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:53 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:His laugh is girly?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnbTcZM7p58

been edited but the others are longer. He also has a girly startle scream too.

I love his laugh

by **Great Franconia and Verana** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:53 pm

Canada's news poster boy, the always handsome Peter Mansbridge.

Thermodolia wrote:
Great Franconia and Verana wrote:Dye is a magical thing.

That hair ain't dyed

I doubt that.
It looks unnatural as shit.

by **The Black Forrest** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:53 pm

Kravanica wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
And? A "slanted" viewpoint doesn't make it wrong. And I am curious. What should she be reporting?

Distorted reporting and outright lying, however, does. And what should she report on? I would prefer that she report on nothing and leave the air.

It would have been simpler to type "I don't know"

by **Militant Costco** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:53 pm

Who the hell is "she"?

There's lots of "she's" in this world. A name would be nice.

by **Kravanica** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:53 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Kravanica wrote:But she will.

saying it doesn't make it true.

if you can give ONE example of her spreading a lie ill agree with you.

...

with the one proviso that if she got something WRONG which happens from time to time she has to have REPEATED it after it was shown to be wrong.

like death panels on the right.

A quick Google search is helpful.

by **The Black Forrest** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:54 pm

Militant Costco wrote:Who the hell is "she"?

There's lots of "she's" in this world. A name would be nice.

Rachel Maddow

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:54 pm

Militant Costco wrote:Who the hell is "she"?

There's lots of "she's" in this world. A name would be nice.

Angela Merkel.

by **Kravanica** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:55 pm

New haven america wrote:
Kravanica wrote:Somehow it seems quite accurate. They are both propagandists. Hannity just has better hair.

Funny how you make these propagandist accusations, even though she consistantly reaches out to Right-wing government officials and reporters and tries to remain as unbiased as possible.

But that would require actual effort and go against "Teh Ebil Left!" narrative that most Right-wing and Libertarians have, and we know certain people on this site have problems with that...

Bernie Sanders has appeared on Fox. What's your point? Having people who disagree with you on your program is not evidence of being unbiased.

This is truly fascinating to watch people who would normally scold Fox News and conservative news sources are now jumping through hoops to defend Rachel Maddow.

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:56 pm

Kravanica wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
saying it doesn't make it true.

if you can give ONE example of her spreading a lie ill agree with you.

...

with the one proviso that if she got something WRONG which happens from time to time she has to have REPEATED it after it was shown to be wrong.

like death panels on the right.

A quick Google search is helpful.

that list is pathetic. 6 "false statements" in 6 years.

by **Kravanica** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:56 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Kravanica wrote:Distorted reporting and outright lying, however, does. And what should she report on? I would prefer that she report on nothing and leave the air.

It would have been simpler to type "I don't know"

I'm purposefully putting as minimal effort into this as possible.

A debate involving how Rachel Maddow is biased is truly wondrous to be had.

by **Galloism** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:57 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Kravanica wrote:A quick Google search is helpful.

that list is pathetic. 6 "false statements" in 6 years.

For Trump, six false statements is referred to as "a slow Tuesday."

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:57 pm

Militant Costco wrote:Who the hell is "she"?

There's lots of "she's" in this world. A name would be nice.

4 minutes from now her show is on MSNBC and you should watch the first segment. it will blow your mind.

and it has that great old video of the galloping bridge in Washington state.

by **Kravanica** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:57 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Kravanica wrote:A quick Google search is helpful.

that list is pathetic. 6 "false statements" in 6 years.

You asked for one example of her lying. I gave you six.

What exactly would you like?

by **Great Franconia and Verana** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:57 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Kravanica wrote:A quick Google search is helpful.

that list is pathetic. 6 "false statements" in 6 years.

Does not meet the FOX news quota of 6 every 6 hours

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:57 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Kravanica wrote:Distorted reporting and outright lying, however, does. And what should she report on? I would prefer that she report on nothing and leave the air.

It would have been simpler to type "I don't know"

Don't worry friendo, I already gave you something she was wrong on :^)

by **The Black Forrest** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:57 pm

Kravanica wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
saying it doesn't make it true.

if you can give ONE example of her spreading a lie ill agree with you.

...

with the one proviso that if she got something WRONG which happens from time to time she has to have REPEATED it after it was shown to be wrong.

like death panels on the right.

A quick Google search is helpful.

Now was that so hard?

But congratulations. You did find 6 things for a show that started in 2008 and has over 400 episodes.

You have shown she can make mistakes versus being an outright hack.

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:58 pm

Kravanica wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
that list is pathetic. 6 "false statements" in 6 years.

You asked for one example of her lying. I gave you six.

What exactly would you like?

I would like to remember that you aren't worth talking to.

by **Kravanica** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:58 pm

Great Franconia and Verana wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
that list is pathetic. 6 "false statements" in 6 years.

Does not meet the FOX news quota of 6 every 6 hours

Interestingly, studies show Fox News is more factual than MSNBC.

by **Washington Resistance Army** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:59 pm

Kravanica wrote:
Great Franconia and Verana wrote:Does not meet the FOX news quota of 6 every 6 hours

Interestingly, studies show Fox News is more factual than MSNBC.

I'm actually kinda shocked to see CNN above 50% on factual, tbh.

by **Kravanica** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 9:59 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Kravanica wrote:You asked for one example of her lying. I gave you six.

What exactly would you like?

I would like to remember that you aren't worth talking to.

>asks for one example of someone lying
>gets six
>"you aren't worth talking to"

Somehow I feel incredibly satisfied.

by **Ashmoria** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:00 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Kravanica wrote:A quick Google search is helpful.

Now was that so hard?

But congratulations. You did find 6 things for a show that started in 2008 and has over 400 episodes.

You have shown she can make mistakes versus being an outright hack.

I'm pretty sure that I you look at MY Posts here since January you will find at least 6 "lies" and I don't post anything that I'm not sure of.

by **Frenequesta** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:00 pm

Kravanica wrote:
Great Franconia and Verana wrote:Does not meet the FOX news quota of 6 every 6 hours

Interestingly, studies show Fox News is more factual than MSNBC.

No, that just means they do more factual reporting. In other words, MSNBC is predominantly commentary.

by **Galloism** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:00 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Kravanica wrote:Interestingly, studies show Fox News is more factual than MSNBC.

I'm actually kinda shocked to see CNN above 50% on factual, tbh.

I'd believe that. Of American TV news networks, CNN is probably the best.

I like BBC, though.

by **Neutraligon** » Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:01 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:
Kravanica wrote:But I can. And that is why I don't listen to her. Unbiased reporting is so hard to come by these days. I've given up the search.

Ok. How is she "biased" and how is she wrong?

I would claim she has a left wing bias, that does not necessarily mean she is wrong.

Trump MAGAThread IV: Twixt Scylla & Some Bad Hombres

Who is online