Indo-European Union wrote:Alvecia wrote:Nah, appears I can't read instead. Missed your comment about "and how many happened in the USA between 1980 and 2017 according to this list", just focused on the first bit.
I think we have plenty evidence to state that it is likely that regulation are not the cause there.
Whatever. You said the number of crashes was itself evidence: now you admit it isn't. Or evidence in the other direction. Now you have to try to explain away why there are way more crises under regulation even though regulation reduces crises. Whatever.
I said the number of crashes in Britain remaining roughly equal despite the introduction of regulations was evidence that regulations have no effect.
The number of crashes in the US increasing does not change this. In fact, it supports that assertion, as now we have both an instance of financial stability and financial instability, both under the effect of increased regulation. Evidently the amount of regulation has no correlation to either financial stability or financial instability.
We are excluding a lot of nuance, mind.










