
by Takaram » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:12 pm

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:15 pm
Takaram wrote:So, how many of you watched the Oscars? What did you think of the results?
http://oscar.go.com/oscar-night/winners ... ut_livenow
I think that District 9 was kind of gypped, personally.
PS: Normally, I really wouldn't care, but hey

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:18 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:20 pm

by Farnhamia » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:21 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:
It was a big deal during late summer, but ultimately a small film that went largely on word of mouth. Which makes tonight kind of a cool David vs. Goliath thing. Especially when you take into account Bigelow is Cameron's ex-wife.

by Socialist Obama » Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:28 pm

by Tahar Joblis » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:04 pm

by Dakini » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:09 pm


by Aelosia » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:09 pm

by Dakini » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:11 pm
Aelosia wrote:The Hurt Locker was a relatively creative movie. More creative than Avatar's storyline and way of narrating things.

by You-Gi-Owe » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:16 pm

by Soratsin » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:26 pm

by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:33 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:35 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:35 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:So, why did THE HURT LOCKER do so well at the Oscars?
I rented it a coulple of months ago. I thought it was a great movie, it was exciting and emotionally draining at the same time. Sort of like how SWEENEY TODD was glorious and totally fucking ominous at the same time.
But, seriously, with THE HURT LOCKER and THE BLIND SIDE, is Hollywood becoming more tollerant of the military and films that don't have "R" ratings?

by Dakini » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:37 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:41 pm
Wilgrove wrote:Am I the only one who haven't even heard of the movie until The Oscar? I haven't seen any advertisement or trailer for it...at all.

by Braaainsss » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:45 pm
Soratsin wrote:I'm honestly surprised Avater didn't get more awards, I was sure it would win best picture. I'm not saying that it deserved more awards, personally I'd give Avatar 2/5 stars, it's just that people seem to love anything that has good effects, explosions, 3d, and sex scenes in it.

by Dakini » Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:55 pm
Braaainsss wrote:Soratsin wrote:I'm honestly surprised Avater didn't get more awards, I was sure it would win best picture. I'm not saying that it deserved more awards, personally I'd give Avatar 2/5 stars, it's just that people seem to love anything that has good effects, explosions, 3d, and sex scenes in it.
NPR pointed out that the Academy is made up of many more actors than directors, so they're unlikely to go for a movie like Avatar that minimizes the importance of acting.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Bienenhalde, Birnadia, Cannot think of a name, Communo-Slavocia, Duvniask, Elejamie, Escalia, Hirota, Ifreann, Juansonia, Lord Dominator, Mearisse, Neo-American States, New Ciencia, Pizza Friday Forever91, Ryemarch, The Aswaltican Imperium, The Dodo Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement