Maurepas wrote:JJ Place wrote:Maurepas wrote:JJ Place wrote:Maurepas wrote:JJ Place wrote:Kreigan wrote:Alsatian Knights wrote:HunterBradleyLand wrote:Which RL world faith is the most likely to last to the end of humans and why?
I personally feel that Atheism will last longest because with science advancing, most people will convert to the faith.
All Aboard!
Atheism is the lack of Faith. You can't stomp out Ideas and Beliefs. Something humans have tried time and time again, and failed at.
Athieism isnt a religon. a religon is a belife in somthing athiest dont belive in anything its like saying scientology is a religon
it's more of a belief; Athiesm is the rejection of religion, coupled with the belief that there is no real 'God' figure; at least that's true Athiesm. It's a lot more complicated than that; yet, there's just something about Athiesm that lingers as a 'belief'; even if that belief is the belief that other beliefs are incorrect.
That theory has been presented here many a time...and discredited
A lack of belief does not denote a belief itself, anymore than a lack of Coffee indicates a bag of fresh ground beans from the hills of Colombia,
Yet, Atheism is a belief, as the belief is that there is no God, without un-questionable evidence that there is not a God. Sure, Atheism is much better than religion and other beliefs; yet Atheism itself still is essentailly a belief in and of itself. Its just not a belief as we see a belief on the surface.
No, it isnt a belief, as I explained, not holding a belief is not the same as holding one...
It is a fundamental difference, it is an acceptance that God does not exist, based on there being no proof that he does...
Then you have no proof that God does not exist as well, without truely understanding why you feel this way.
It is not my job to find said proof, it is the One's who are making the claim, i.e the Religious...
I truly understand why, do not insult my intelligence, as I have already stated, once again, do ye not understand the phrase, BURDEN OF PROOF?
Then your simply rejecting religion; why believe in something simply because the oposing argument is incorrect in many ways?
Ok, ok, ok, perhaps I Joe Bidened the last part of my responce; sorry about that. I did not mean in any way to insult your intelligence; sorry about that one. Still; it's not a proven arguement, even if the other side has falsities within its belief.