Right-Wing Discussion Thread VIII: McCarthy Was Right

[Great Minarchistan]

'ey, Jefferson was a damn good president yo

You mean dismantled our fucking navy in the middle of a global war? No, he was shit.

Nah, just that third folk who made an investment that is worth trillions today.

[The East Marches II]

You mean dismantled our fucking navy in the middle of a global war? No, he was shit.

Nah, just that third folk who made an investment that is worth trillions today.

>Only achievement was concentrating executive power (because its ok if its him) and signing a deal with a cash strapped person in Europe

Anybody could have fleeced Napoleon. His Presidency had many more issues than that. Literally surface only analysis.

[The Sauganash Union]

Nah, just that third folk who made an investment that is worth trillions today.

>Only achievement was concentrating executive power (because its ok if its him) and signing a deal with a cash strapped person in Europe

Anybody could have fleeced Napoleon. His Presidency had many more issues than that. Literally surface only analysis.

To talk about Jefferson's enemy:

I find it funny that liberals have psuedohistorical affinities for Alexander Hamilton, though.

The man advocated for what could be interpreted as a landed gentry within a republican context, was a nativist, and quite the authoritarian.

[The East Marches II]

>Only achievement was concentrating executive power (because its ok if its him) and signing a deal with a cash strapped person in Europe

Anybody could have fleeced Napoleon. His Presidency had many more issues than that. Literally surface only analysis.

To talk about Jefferson's enemy:

I find it funny that liberals have psuedohistorical affinities for Alexander Hamilton, though.

The man advocated for what could be interpreted as a landed gentry within a republican context, was a nativist, and quite the authoritarian.

Its the play Hamilton thats done it recently. "He would have totally been a modern liberal". Its just white washing for the modern era, no better than propaganda really. He was also a rum runner and tax evader. Something they don't generally approve of either. Have you seen the HBO series John Adams?

[Salus Maior]

'ey, Jefferson was a damn good president yo

You mean dismantled our fucking navy in the middle of a global war? No, he was shit.

Probably a good thing not to get involved in the Napoleonic wars.

[Austrasien]

To talk about Jefferson's enemy:

I find it funny that liberals have psuedohistorical affinities for Alexander Hamilton, though.

The man advocated for what could be interpreted as a landed gentry within a republican context, was a nativist, and quite the authoritarian.

Trump's economic plan is very Hamiltonian.

[The East Marches II]

You mean dismantled our fucking navy in the middle of a global war? No, he was shit.

Probably a good thing not to get involved in the Napoleonic wars.

Well armed neutrality in the midst of a global conflict is not a foolish policy. Being without defense and neutrality is a plainly stupid one.

[The Sauganash Union]

To talk about Jefferson's enemy:

I find it funny that liberals have psuedohistorical affinities for Alexander Hamilton, though.

The man advocated for what could be interpreted as a landed gentry within a republican context, was a nativist, and quite the authoritarian.

Its the play Hamilton thats done it recently. "He would have totally been a modern liberal". Its just white washing for the modern era, no better than propaganda really. He was also a rum runner and tax evader. Something they don't generally approve of either. Have you seen the HBO series John Adams?

Hamilton is liberal revisionism and self-congratulation. Hamilton (the man) was very Nixonian in character (to retroactively use a term).

John Adams was a great series. Paul Giamatti really shone.

[The Sauganash Union]

Probably a good thing not to get involved in the Napoleonic wars.

Well armed neutrality in the midst of a global conflict is not a foolish policy. Being without defense and neutrality is a plainly stupid one.

This is where we must also criticize Hamilton. While the radical Democratic-Republicans wanted us to join on France's side, the radical Federalist wanted us to join on Britain's side. Neither option was conducive.

That being said, all hail James Monroe.

[Neo Balka]

To talk about Jefferson's enemy:

I find it funny that liberals have psuedohistorical affinities for Alexander Hamilton, though.

The man advocated for what could be interpreted as a landed gentry within a republican context, was a nativist, and quite the authoritarian.

Its the play Hamilton thats done it recently. "He would have totally been a modern liberal". Its just white washing for the modern era, no better than propaganda really. He was also a rum runner and tax evader. Something they don't generally approve of either. Have you seen the HBO series John Adams?

Hamilton is Broadway grogshit.

[The East Marches II]

Well armed neutrality in the midst of a global conflict is not a foolish policy. Being without defense and neutrality is a plainly stupid one.

This is where we must also criticize Hamilton. While the radical Democratic-Republicans wanted us to join on France's side, the radical Federalist wanted us to join on Britain's side. Neither option was conducive.

That being said, all hail James Monroe.

Yes I agree in both cases.

Its the play Hamilton thats done it recently. "He would have totally been a modern liberal". Its just white washing for the modern era, no better than propaganda really. He was also a rum runner and tax evader. Something they don't generally approve of either. Have you seen the HBO series John Adams?

Hamilton is liberal revisionism and self-congratulation. Hamilton (the man) was very Nixonian in character (to retroactively use a term).

John Adams was a great series. Paul Giamatti really shone.

Good man, you know your stuff.

[The Sauganash Union]

This is where we must also criticize Hamilton. While the radical Democratic-Republicans wanted us to join on France's side, the radical Federalist wanted us to join on Britain's side. Neither option was conducive.

That being said, all hail James Monroe.

Yes I agree in both cases.

Hamilton is liberal revisionism and self-congratulation. Hamilton (the man) was very Nixonian in character (to retroactively use a term).

John Adams was a great series. Paul Giamatti really shone.

Good man, you know your stuff.

Birds of a feather, my friend

[Great Minarchistan]

His Presidency had many more issues than that. Literally surface only analysis.

Indeed, the trillion-dollar investment is just the first. He was also the main signer of American Independence, built American Minarchy, fought against debt and he also had neat speeches and quotes.

[The Sauganash Union]

His Presidency had many more issues than that. Literally surface only analysis.

Indeed, the trillion-dollar investment is just the first. He was also the main signer of American Independence, built American Minarchy, fought against debt and he also had neat speeches and quotes.

Nearly all of this was before he was president. Jefferson's political peak was in the 1770s and 1780s. He was a great Founding Father, political philosopher, and revolutionary.

Not a very good executive.

[Jelmatt]

>Only achievement was concentrating executive power (because its ok if its him) and signing a deal with a cash strapped person in Europe

Anybody could have fleeced Napoleon. His Presidency had many more issues than that. Literally surface only analysis.

To talk about Jefferson's enemy:

I find it funny that liberals have psuedohistorical affinities for Alexander Hamilton, though.

The man advocated for what could be interpreted as a landed gentry within a republican context, was a nativist, and quite the authoritarian.

Yeah, I don't really get why they do it either. On the whole Hamilton's attitudes seem to have been fairly right-leaning, even if his (economic) policies aren't what we traditionally think of as "right-wing."

[Great Minarchistan]

Indeed, the trillion-dollar investment is just the first. He was also the main signer of American Independence, built American Minarchy, fought against debt and he also had neat speeches and quotes.

Nearly all of this was before he was president. Jefferson's political peak was in the 1770s and 1780s. He was a great Founding Father, political philosopher, and revolutionary.

Not a very good executive.

Louisiana purchase and debt fighting isn't nothing. A good part of American Minarchy was built during his terms either.

[Great Minarchistan]

even if his (economic) policies aren't what we traditionally think of as "right-wing."

His economic policies were broadly keynesian, even though Keynes wasn't born at that time, kek.

[Neo Balka]

It is a great day when a ANTIFA member gets BTFO'd.

[Individual Thought Patterns]

even if his (economic) policies aren't what we traditionally think of as "right-wing."

His economic policies were broadly keynesian, even though Keynes wasn't born at that time, kek.

Coincidence? I think not.

[Great Minarchistan]

His economic policies were broadly keynesian, even though Keynes wasn't born at that time, kek.

Coincidence? I think not.

*aggregate demand intensifies*

[Kalifati Arab shqiptar]

It is a great day when a ANTIFA member gets BTFO'd.

Hu Ha

[Kalifati Arab shqiptar]

Your move ISIS

[Gim]

Coincidence? I think not.

*aggregate demand intensifies*

Man, the economics terms. I forgot most of them.

[Kalifati Arab shqiptar]

I'd post pictures of the horrors of slavery, but judging by that response, it'd probably just give you an ideological woody.

Because nothing bad ever happened to African Americans ever again...

Regressive agenda #7: Disregard Linear Time - Blur the past with the present so as to demonize modern people for the actions of their ancestors.

[36 Camera Perspective]

Because nothing bad ever happened to African Americans ever again...

Regressive agenda #7: Disregard Linear Time - Blur the past with the present so as to demonize modern people for the actions of their ancestors.

You don't think the current economic inequalities faced by blacks have anything do with slavery or sharecropping?