Right-Wing Discussion Thread VIII: McCarthy Was Right

[United Muscovite Nations]

My ruling on whether Belisarius is a cuck: He's not a cuck, but he has terrible judgement in women, because he married a fucking sociopath. I wouldn't trust him as a wingman, or trust any woman he picks around children.

[The East Marches II]

My ruling on whether Belisarius is a cuck: He's not a cuck, but he has terrible judgement in women, because he married a fucking sociopath. I wouldn't trust him as a wingman, or trust any woman he picks around children.

Another victory in court for TEM.

[Old Tyrannia]

The rebellion in Les Mis was not the July Revolution. Pretantia has it right, Les Mis depicts the June Rebellion, which was a failed revolt against the monarchy which had been set up by the July Revolution.

Hum. My bad. This is still wrong, tho, as the painting is representing the Révolution of 1848, anyway.

I'm pretty sure that Delacroix's Liberty leading the people represents the 1830 revolution that overthrew Charles X. It was painted in part to remind Louis-Philippe of his promises upon the establishment of the July Monarchy, the failure to uphold which directly led to his overthrow in 1848.

[Aelex]

I'm pretty sure that Delacroix's Liberty leading the people represents the 1830 revolution that overthrew Charles X. It was painted in part to remind Louis-Philippe of his promises upon the establishment of the July Monarchy, the failure to uphold which directly led to his overthrow in 1848.

Ouf, I'm mingling everything indeed and you do are right. I'm way too fucking tired right now.

[Grand Britannia]

My ruling on whether Belisarius is a cuck: He's not a cuck, but he has terrible judgement in women, because he married a fucking sociopath. I wouldn't trust him as a wingman, or trust any woman he picks around children.

UMN confirmed would let his wife fuck other men as long as she's the dominant one.

[Luminesa]

My ruling on whether Belisarius is a cuck: He's not a cuck, but he has terrible judgement in women, because he married a fucking sociopath. I wouldn't trust him as a wingman, or trust any woman he picks around children.

Another victory in court for TEM.

We went to court? AND YOU FORGOT ME?!

[The East Marches II]

Another victory in court for TEM.

We went to court? AND YOU FORGOT ME?!

Sorry Lumi, I will be sure to bring a guest pass for next time.

[United Muscovite Nations]

My ruling on whether Belisarius is a cuck: He's not a cuck, but he has terrible judgement in women, because he married a fucking sociopath. I wouldn't trust him as a wingman, or trust any woman he picks around children.

UMN confirmed would let his wife fuck other men as long as she's the dominant one.

No, I would divorce immediately. It would be stupid to even marry one like that in the first place.

[Kekonistan]

LDT

>tfw Pinochet is a libertarian

Honestly, I can't complain. I do like the logical conclusion Hoppe finds.

Hail our prophet Al-Hoppiyuun (PBUH)

[Luminesa]

We went to court? AND YOU FORGOT ME?!

Sorry Lumi, I will be sure to bring a guest pass for next time.

Yay!

[Old Tyrannia]

I'm pretty sure that Delacroix's Liberty leading the people represents the 1830 revolution that overthrew Charles X. It was painted in part to remind Louis-Philippe of his promises upon the establishment of the July Monarchy, the failure to uphold which directly led to his overthrow in 1848.

Ouf, I'm mingling everything indeed and you do are right. I'm way too fucking tired right now.

It happens to the best of us, monsieur.

Of course, realistically the vast majority of people who post here are basically liberal nationalists rather than real reactionaries, so you'd all be behind the barricades in the July Revolution along with the leftists. The only people who post regularly in this thread that I can see supporting Charles X against the usurper are myself, Dio and Bede.

[United Muscovite Nations]

Ouf, I'm mingling everything indeed and you do are right. I'm way too fucking tired right now.

It happens to the best of us, monsieur.

Of course, realistically the vast majority of people who post here are basically liberal nationalists rather than real reactionaries, so you'd all be behind the barricades in the July Revolution along with the leftists. The only people who post regularly in this thread that I can see supporting Charles X against the usurper are myself, Dio and Bede.

Eh, I might go for the reaction. I am, after all, a supporter of absolutism. Though, I may not be wholly behind inherited monarchy (or, at least, I think that it should be up to more than just inheritance)

[Jelmatt]

Ouf, I'm mingling everything indeed and you do are right. I'm way too fucking tired right now.

It happens to the best of us, monsieur.

Of course, realistically the vast majority of people who post here are basically liberal nationalists rather than real reactionaries, so you'd all be behind the barricades in the July Revolution along with the leftists. The only people who post regularly in this thread that I can see supporting Charles X against the usurper are myself, Dio and Bede.

Yeah, but the difference is they'd probably be cool with Louis-Phillipe, and we'd be like "vive la république (démocratique et sociale)."

In all honesty though, I don't really mind ceremonial constitutional monarchies, so as long as we completely took power away from the King, he can still call himself King if he wants. That's fine.

(monarchie démocratique et sociale?)

[Old Tyrannia]

It happens to the best of us, monsieur.

Of course, realistically the vast majority of people who post here are basically liberal nationalists rather than real reactionaries, so you'd all be behind the barricades in the July Revolution along with the leftists. The only people who post regularly in this thread that I can see supporting Charles X against the usurper are myself, Dio and Bede.

Eh, I might go for the reaction. I am, after all, a supporter of absolutism. Though, I may not be wholly behind inherited monarchy (or, at least, I think that it should be up to more than just inheritance)

You're not a Legitimist, in other words. Which means that Louis-Philippe's version of monarchy would likely appeal to you much more.

[United Muscovite Nations]

Eh, I might go for the reaction. I am, after all, a supporter of absolutism. Though, I may not be wholly behind inherited monarchy (or, at least, I think that it should be up to more than just inheritance)

You're not a Legitimist, in other words. Which means that Louis-Philippe's version of monarchy would likely appeal to you much more.

Why so?

[Aelex]

It happens to the best of us, monsieur.

Of course, realistically the vast majority of people who post here are basically liberal nationalists rather than real reactionaries, so you'd all be behind the barricades in the July Revolution along with the leftists. The only people who post regularly in this thread that I can see supporting Charles X against the usurper are myself, Dio and Bede.

Thanks. ;^)

And, well, I would personally have stayed at home as I would have saw neither Charles X "the """Beloved""" " de Bourbon nor Louis-Phillipe "the Bourgeois-King" d'Orléans as people worth to fight and die for.

Louis-Napoléon and the République, however, absolutely were.

[Nekotani]

It happens to the best of us, monsieur.

Of course, realistically the vast majority of people who post here are basically liberal nationalists rather than real reactionaries, so you'd all be behind the barricades in the July Revolution along with the leftists. The only people who post regularly in this thread that I can see supporting Charles X against the usurper are myself, Dio and Bede.

Thanks. ;^)

And, well, I would personally have stayed at home as I would have saw neither Charles X "the """Beloved""" " de Bourbon nor Louis-Phillipe "the Bourgeois-King" d'Orléans as people worth to fight and die for.

Louis-Napoléon and the République, however, absolutely were.

"There is only one Bonapartist, Neko - and he is mad!"

[United Muscovite Nations]

Thanks. ;^)

And, well, I would personally have stayed at home as I would have saw neither Charles X "the """Beloved""" " de Bourbon nor Louis-Phillipe "the Bourgeois-King" d'Orléans as people worth to fight and die for.

Louis-Napoléon and the République, however, absolutely were.

"There is only one Bonapartist, Neko - and he is mad!"

And there's only Bonaparte worth supporting, tbh.

[The V O I D]

My friend is a dirty monarchist that believes the US should submit to the UK's authority and become a dominion/colony once again.

How do I fix him?

[Aelex]

And there's only Bonaparte worth supporting, tbh.

Napoléon III, indeed, who was thrice the man his uncle was.

[Nekotani]

My friend is a dirty monarchist that believes the US should submit to the UK's authority and become a dominion/colony once again.

How do I fix him?

You don't, you just laugh at his naivety.

[Ban Pho]

My friend is a dirty monarchist that believes the US should submit to the UK's authority and become a dominion/colony once again.

How do I fix him?

You don't, you just laugh at his naivety.

Do you have a doctors grade in anti-monarchism or something?

[United Muscovite Nations]

And there's only Bonaparte worth supporting, tbh.

Napoléon III, indeed, who was thrice the man his uncle was.

This is a joke, right?

[Aelex]

This is a joke, right?

No. I advise you to read on the man. His life was truly fascinating and it's without the slightest bit of sarcasm and irony that I can say that he did was thrice the man his uncle was.
Sure, he wasn't perfect (in fact, he was rather far from that) and his short-coming costed us dearly but that doesn't take away anything from what he did.

Napoléon I won for himself glory in the pages of history but left France in the most abject ruins while Napoléon III only got opprobrium on his name while he reconstructed France and lead her out of internal crisis that could have made her implode totally.
There is absolutely no doubt that Napoléon III was better than his uncle.

[Ban Pho]

AFA scum