NATION

PASSWORD

Mass immigration: should we embrace it or not?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:57 pm

Futrellia wrote:Moving massive amounts of people from a less developed regions will eventually turn those more developed regions into less developed regions because they take up space, food, money, waste, etc. So no.

and how is that? Has the UK become less developed? Germany, Canada or the US? No? please give evidence before making statement like that.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:58 pm

Novus America wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
The 'status quo' is fine. Nazis being Nazis is not a failure of the status quo. We don't negotiate with terrorists.


Neo Nazis are not the only problem. Moreover no the status quo is not fine. We have a huge number of social problems today.


Oh lord, yes.

And almost all of our problems ultimately come down to class war. Not multiculturalism.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:59 pm

San Lumen wrote:
The East Marches wrote:
My own father was an immigrant. I would tell him tough luck, sucks to be you. Unlike others, he does recognize the need for control in immigration and the right of countries to deny people entry. Why you think that being the descendent of an immigrant means you should support open borders is beyond me.


You would have told him tough luck? Do you even know what pogroms are? Guess what shortly after Romania was ravaged by World War One and when the Holocaust occurred those in his family who didn't get out were killed. Many did get out fortunately. Had my great grandfather not come to the US when he did I would most likely not be typing this.


Yes I would have told him tough luck, sucks to be you. Where is the part where we are legally obligated to open our doors to anybody with a sad tale and a puppy dog eyes? Perhaps you can show me that. The world is a rough place, bad things happen all the time and you can't save everyone. Best to look out for own and get your home affairs in order before looking to others.

San Lumen wrote:
The East Marches wrote:
Another Canadian here begs to differ on whether it works.

And please explain how. the left won a massive victory in in 2015 in case you didnt know. They rejected a party that was brining in hatred and anti immigration unlike my country which embraced it because of a stupid election system but thats not the point. Canada rejected politics like what you and Ostraeuropa are espousing. Please give evidence of how multiculturalism and diversity isn't working in Canada.


I never espoused what Ostroeuropa did. The Canadian conservatives were pro immigration. Neither were like Trump.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
Scandinavian Nations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1083
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Scandinavian Nations » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:00 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:When someone from a different culture does something illegal, it's the crime that's the problem. Treat the real problem.

The crime is a symptom. When people from a different culture consistently do more illegal things than people from the core culture, treating the symptoms (reducing the crime rate) may be better accomplished by removing the high-crime cultures.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:00 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Novus America wrote:
Neo Nazis are not the only problem. Moreover no the status quo is not fine. We have a huge number of social problems today.


Oh lord, yes.

And almost all of our problems ultimately come down to class war. Not multiculturalism.


I agree a lot of the problems are with class rather then multiculturalism. Although, in the US at least, class and race tend to be rather connected.
As to immigration, I am iffy on the concept. I think countries do have the right to determine who can cross their borders, in fact I think that is rather necessary to the stability of a society.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:00 pm

Futrellia wrote:Moving massive amounts of people from a less developed regions will eventually turn those more developed regions into less developed regions because they take up space, food, money, waste, etc. So no.


'Moving massive amounts of people' is going to happen, anyway.

Even if estimates of rising sea levels were massively wrong - they discuss a real phenomenon - and one that is going to displace hundreds of millions of people. Soon.

And that's not the only environmental change that is going to trigger mass-migration.

So we really need to work out how we're going to deal with this issue before it becomes a problem.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:01 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Futrellia wrote:Moving massive amounts of people from a less developed regions will eventually turn those more developed regions into less developed regions because they take up space, food, money, waste, etc. So no.


'Moving massive amounts of people' is going to happen, anyway.

Even if estimates of rising sea levels were massively wrong - they discuss a real phenomenon - and one that is going to displace hundreds of millions of people. Soon.

And that's not the only environmental change that is going to trigger mass-migration.

So we really need to work out how we're going to deal with this issue before it becomes a problem.


We are gonna need a bigger wall it appears.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1958
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:01 pm

The East Marches wrote:
Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
I guess we should start by defining 'working' before we go any further - what exactly isn't 'working' and what would it look like if it were?


If things were working, you wouldn't have a meme PM and we wouldn't have a meme President. How is that?


Yeah Trudeau is a meme in parts of the internet where Americans play a large part in the discourse. Doesn't say much about Trudeau's popularity amongst Canadians, which is pretty strong and stable as of recent polling.
"To make a thief, make an owner; to create crime, create laws." ~ Laia Asieo Odo, The Social Organism

anarchist communist | deep ecologist | aspiring Cynic | gay | [insert other adjectives here]

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:02 pm

I think a policy that is reason based and balances national security with the right to immigrate is the best course to take.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:03 pm

The East Marches wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
You would have told him tough luck? Do you even know what pogroms are? Guess what shortly after Romania was ravaged by World War One and when the Holocaust occurred those in his family who didn't get out were killed. Many did get out fortunately. Had my great grandfather not come to the US when he did I would most likely not be typing this.


Yes I would have told him tough luck, sucks to be you. Where is the part where we are legally obligated to open our doors to anybody with a sad tale and a puppy dog eyes? Perhaps you can show me that. The world is a rough place, bad things happen all the time and you can't save everyone. Best to look out for own and get your home affairs in order before looking to others.

San Lumen wrote:And please explain how. the left won a massive victory in in 2015 in case you didnt know. They rejected a party that was brining in hatred and anti immigration unlike my country which embraced it because of a stupid election system but thats not the point. Canada rejected politics like what you and Ostraeuropa are espousing. Please give evidence of how multiculturalism and diversity isn't working in Canada.


I never espoused what Ostroeuropa did. The Canadian conservatives were pro immigration. Neither were like Trump.

So your family never immigrated from another country huh? Unless you are a Native tribe your family were immigrants at some point. And if that is taken further everyone is an immigrant. Humanity began in what is now Ethiopia.
So basically what your saying is I shouldnt be here today? My ancestors should have risked death and persecution from the pogroms and the impeding world war? Do you even know what a pogrom is?

Harper could have fooled me with his anti Muslim polices.

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:05 pm

San Lumen wrote:
The East Marches wrote:
Yes I would have told him tough luck, sucks to be you. Where is the part where we are legally obligated to open our doors to anybody with a sad tale and a puppy dog eyes? Perhaps you can show me that. The world is a rough place, bad things happen all the time and you can't save everyone. Best to look out for own and get your home affairs in order before looking to others.



I never espoused what Ostroeuropa did. The Canadian conservatives were pro immigration. Neither were like Trump.

So your family never immigrated from another country huh? Unless you are a Native tribe your family were immigrants at some point. And if that is taken further everyone is an immigrant. Humanity began in what is now Ethiopia.
So basically what your saying is I shouldnt be here today? My ancestors should have risked death and persecution from the pogroms and the impeding world war? Do you even know what a pogrom is?

Harper could have fooled me with his anti Muslim polices.


I already mentioned my father was an immigrant. Just because he was one, does mean I should automatically support open borders. I did not say you shouldn't be here. You presented me with a hypothetical regarding the current immigration situation. I answered that yes I would turn such a person away.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
Bogdanov Vishniac
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1958
Founded: May 01, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Bogdanov Vishniac » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:05 pm

The East Marches wrote:I never espoused what Ostroeuropa did. The Canadian conservatives were pro immigration. Neither were like Trump.


Which is of course telling. Anti-multiculturalism is so far out of the mainstream that none of the major parties espouse it as policy. Excluding people like Leitch, of course, and she's kind of a walking punchline.
Last edited by Bogdanov Vishniac on Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"To make a thief, make an owner; to create crime, create laws." ~ Laia Asieo Odo, The Social Organism

anarchist communist | deep ecologist | aspiring Cynic | gay | [insert other adjectives here]

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:06 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Novus America wrote:
The U.K. is not without problems.


Absolutely. And, going back to where I came in - that's a problem with the problems, not with multiculturalism.

When someone from a different culture does something illegal, it's the crime that's the problem. Treat the real problem.


The existence of segregated ethnic ghettos is also a problem. Treating the problem will also require other changes than merely arresting people for crimes.
Last edited by Novus America on Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:08 pm

Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
The East Marches wrote:I never espoused what Ostroeuropa did. The Canadian conservatives were pro immigration. Neither were like Trump.


Which is of course telling. Anti-multiculturalism is so far out of the mainstream that none of the major parties espouse it as policy.


Yes, Canadians clearly lack backbone to say what must be said :^)

Though in more seriousness, I suspect you may soon be affected by what the rest of the West is going through. I wish you lot good luck.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
Scandinavian Nations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1083
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Scandinavian Nations » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:09 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:Even if estimates of rising sea levels were massively wrong - they discuss a real phenomenon - and one that is going to displace hundreds of millions of people. Soon.
And that's not the only environmental change that is going to trigger mass-migration.

First, even if everything about AGW proves to be true - so far it doesn't - it projects at worst 1m of sea level rise by 2100, which isn't even "soon".

Second, environmental changes can't by themselves result in mass migration. The necessary prerequisite for mass migration is countries opening their borders to it. No open borders, no mass migration.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:11 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
Novus America wrote:
Neo Nazis are not the only problem. Moreover no the status quo is not fine. We have a huge number of social problems today.


Oh lord, yes.

And almost all of our problems ultimately come down to class war. Not multiculturalism.


The two are not mutually exclusive. The non melting pot type multi culturalism actually creates separate ethnic classes rather than encouraging the creation of a single United culture and class. Within that there can be different subcultures but certain things need be universal.

Having separate ethnic ghettos with culture different than the rest, and that do not work well with the rest exacerbates class and ecnomic tensions.
Last edited by Novus America on Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81228
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:12 pm

The East Marches wrote:
San Lumen wrote:So your family never immigrated from another country huh? Unless you are a Native tribe your family were immigrants at some point. And if that is taken further everyone is an immigrant. Humanity began in what is now Ethiopia.
So basically what your saying is I shouldnt be here today? My ancestors should have risked death and persecution from the pogroms and the impeding world war? Do you even know what a pogrom is?

Harper could have fooled me with his anti Muslim polices.


I already mentioned my father was an immigrant. Just because he was one, does mean I should automatically support open borders. I did not say you shouldn't be here. You presented me with a hypothetical regarding the current immigration situation. I answered that yes I would turn such a person away.

I never said I supported open borders

But under my hypothetical I likely wouldnt be here today because of your policy

Its so easy for you to say send them back. You've never known the kind of situation my ancestors faced. You've never known dictatorship, religious persecution, lack of basic freedoms, the possibility of being imprisoned for who you love or speaking out against the government, or a country torn apart by civil war.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:13 pm

Neutraligon wrote:I agree a lot of the problems are with class rather then multiculturalism. Although, in the US at least, class and race tend to be rather connected.


There's truth to that, but it's important to think about the sequence of cause and effect.

Neutraligon wrote:As to immigration, I am iffy on the concept. I think countries do have the right to determine who can cross their borders, in fact I think that is rather necessary to the stability of a society.


It's not 'necessary' unless you are bound to 'national identity' as your governing principle. If you accepted that the modern common 'nationstate' is a relatively new invention, and considered solutions that involved stability on both a greater and lesser scale, national borders are largely irrelevant.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:15 pm

Scandinavian Nations wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:When someone from a different culture does something illegal, it's the crime that's the problem. Treat the real problem.

The crime is a symptom.


But it's the crime part that is illegal. Non-criminal symptoms aren't criminal.

Scandinavian Nations wrote:When people from a different culture consistently do more illegal things than people from the core culture, treating the symptoms (reducing the crime rate) may be better accomplished by removing the high-crime cultures.


Sure. And since brain tumors only occur in brains, the best treatment is to remove everyone's brain.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:16 pm

The East Marches wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
'Moving massive amounts of people' is going to happen, anyway.

Even if estimates of rising sea levels were massively wrong - they discuss a real phenomenon - and one that is going to displace hundreds of millions of people. Soon.

And that's not the only environmental change that is going to trigger mass-migration.

So we really need to work out how we're going to deal with this issue before it becomes a problem.


We are gonna need a bigger wall it appears.


I wish that this wasn't a real 'argument' that's actually being made.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32057
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:16 pm

A country with a developed infrastructure, a stable government, and a functioning police system has nothing to fear from immigration.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:17 pm

San Lumen wrote:
The East Marches wrote:
I already mentioned my father was an immigrant. Just because he was one, does mean I should automatically support open borders. I did not say you shouldn't be here. You presented me with a hypothetical regarding the current immigration situation. I answered that yes I would turn such a person away.

I never said I supported open borders

But under my hypothetical I likely wouldnt be here today because of your policy

Its so easy for you to say send them back. You've never known the kind of situation my ancestors faced. You've never known dictatorship, religious persecution, lack of basic freedoms, the possibility of being imprisoned for who you love or speaking out against the government, or a country torn apart by civil war.


>implying I'd want to send you back

I thought you were going on about how we should let anybody in because persecution etc. etc.

So what if you wouldn't be here under such a policy, you are already here today and so am I. We don't make decisions based on what was best for us in the past but what is best for us in the present/best future outcome.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:18 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
The East Marches wrote:
We are gonna need a bigger wall it appears.


I wish that this wasn't a real 'argument' that's actually being made.


That was meant as a joke tbh. Though it'd be an effectively slogan for encouraging a Dutch style solution to the sea trying to drown us.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:18 pm

Des-Bal wrote:A country with a developed infrastructure, a stable government, and a functioning police system has nothing to fear from immigration.


And what if our infrastructure, policing and government are inadequate? Said problems woould have to be addressed before immigration was increased.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The of Japan » Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:20 pm

The East Marches wrote:
Bogdanov Vishniac wrote:
Which is of course telling. Anti-multiculturalism is so far out of the mainstream that none of the major parties espouse it as policy.


Yes, Canadians clearly lack backbone to say what must be said :^)

Though in more seriousness, I suspect you may soon be affected by what the rest of the West is going through. I wish you lot good luck.

What's your opinion on Trudeau?
Texan Communist and Internationalist

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Dakran, Fartsniffage, Nova Paradisius, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, Stellae Aeternae, The Empire Of The Sutherlands, Thermodolia, Wolfram and Hart

Advertisement

Remove ads