Pasong Tirad wrote:The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:1. What absolute nonesense, a people can survive without culture, but a culture cannot survive without people, if you teach people different practices then the old practices can die out, why do you think that Westrn Europe doesn't cut off thieves hands anymore? Don't tell me that that was never a cultural practice for Western Europeans, because there are many of sources that clearly show the case. And as such, my point on the independence between race and culture.
You're trying to justify your racism by saying that you aren't being racist by saying Anglicized peoples > Hispanic peoples. That's great.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:2. But the thing is we do, Duterte is quite clearly a negative aspect of our society, someone who continues to support him despite his policies is clearly just as guilty as he is, I mean this is a clear question of ethics, if someone supports a murderer as they murder someone are they just as guilty of the murder? To me yes, but obviously your opinion is different.
Our opinions don't matter. Our ethics don't matter. People aren't unintelligent nor are they stupid for supporting who they support. They may be misguided or they may be lying to themselves, among other things, but that doesn't make them stupid. Period. Not even when you support Duterte, a man who we clearly believe isn't serving the best interests of the Filipino. His common supporters still aren't stupid.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:3. Oh please, so now just because I'm not poor and live overseas, that makes me some elitist?
Actually, yeah. Being elite in itself isn't a bad thing, it's just who you are. There's a difference between knowing your privilege and abusing it.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:At the end of the day what segregates the two of us sure is class, but also our effectivity when it comes to helping the nation, as you said you have less resources than I do, which means you absolutely have helped the poor of the country less than I have,
i.e. you hovering over my head about how more well-funded your efforts are. Nice.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:heck just because you were in your LOCAL mayoral elections doesn't mean that you have much of an influence in the political system relative to me, I mean I went to SEVERAL areas and told the people who lived there why they shouldn't vote for Binay or Duterte, not to mention my behind the scenes actions with regard to influencing certain elites, believe it or not my family has political connections and by God did I exhaust all my political connections to try and influence the election, however when Aldub gave their official support, there was nothing I could do.
At the end of the day, I strive to get our country out of poverty, that's why I live outside of it and am gaining as much modern and efficient nation building knowledge as I can, because our country deserves better than what its got. And by God, I will do everything I can to build it up within my lifetime to becoming a top 10 Global economy.
The local election was where I could help, given what little I could do with how much I work. Your political connections (and I'm guessing relation to the elites) proves you are one of the elites. You can't really argue your way out of that.
Blaming Aldub isn't really going to help anybody. Duterte was already popular and with or without the support of their variety show, he still would have won.
Remittances aren't a possible long-term solution to "rid the country of poverty" when social mobility is still institutionally close to impossible. Get back in the Philippines, run for the midterms and make an actual difference. Your "modern" and "efficient" nation building knowledge isn't always going to work in the Philippines and efforts at solving one of the Philippines' thousands of problems are already underway. Neither of us will ever have the resources nor the knowledge to effectively find solutions to everything, so I help in ways that I can despite the limited resources I have (which you clearly liked to point out).The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:4. You do realise we got the rights to our natural resources in the end right? There's no point in crying over something that was so short lived that it barely if not absolutely had no negative effect on our people.
Bullshit anong walang negative effects. Us signing off our sovereign rights aren't negative effects to you? Even the American believes that was some bad shit they pulled. Don't try and justify this. This is the kind of shit that keeps happening, which explains why Gina Lopez' confirmation is in such dire straits (@AltMalacanang is saying her confirmation is going to be turned down due to mining lobby), among other things.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:5. Oh you mean the shelling that SAVED THE LIVES OF FILIPINOS??? I mean no offense, but if you're being tortured by the Abu Sayaff in your home, would you rather be raped and die of a chemical weapon attack from the Government but your house is saved from damage or have your house be riddled with bullets and have all those terrorists dead? I mean it's pretty straightforward, unless you're so hypocritically materialistic that your point on Americans forcing us to trade with them, which was a win for material wealth in the country by the way, would be moot.
The shelling that destroyed centuries of history, the shelling that turned Manila into what you called a shantytown. The "trade" you like to bring up, which is basically American companies stealing our natural resources, wouldn't have benefited shit if it didn't benefit the poorest among us (hint: it didn't). This is what you seem to not understand: GDPs and stocks and what-have-yous aren't felt by the poor. We can understand it, we can even partake in it, but the trickle-down effect isn't being felt because nothing is trickling down. So, your remittances is probably going to help the economy (not in the long term, as I may argue, but that's a different story), but it's not going to help the everyman.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:6. Oh really? Show me the figures, how many Filipinos did the Americans kill? Because at worst the Americans killed thousands, while Marcos alone killed TENS OF THOUSANDS. Let's also take into consideration if Marcos gave us free education, healthcare, and sustained economic growth, no? Then you can't compare anything. Also sown the seeds? Are you so ill educated on our history that you don't know that it was Marcos who started the Troubles? Google search the Malisbong Massacre of 1974 because clearly your school needs to teach this stuff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippin ... erican_War Approximates lie around the mid-high tens of thousands to a hundred thousand Filipinos killed in the war alone. Most facts facts facts believe Marcos killed around 3,200+. I've never heard of this tens of thousands number.
If you think Marcos alone caused the Mindanao conflict, then you may be right in thinking that because his actions did bring about the MNLF - but the "troubles" started way before that, more modern estimates would figure it around the time of the Americans, when they massacred Moros by the thousands, up to the time of the Insular government, when they approved the relocation of Christian Filipinos into South and Southwestern Mindanao in order to displace the still large number of Muslims in the area.The Republic of Pantalleria wrote:7. I'm simply telling you what I've done and do to alleviate the poor of our nation in response to you calling me a quote end quote 'elitist' because if I were I wouldn't have cared less if Binay won, heck I'm a citizen of Australia and New Zealand, countries that can give me a significantly better standard of living than back home, but you know what? I love the Philippines more than those two countries, DESPITE the fact that I was born in New Zealand, you wanna know why? Because it's in my best interest, I was raised THERE, I studied THERE, I learned to talk, walk, love, and hate THERE, and by God I want to live in comfort THERE, I want the standard of living for everyone there to be the same or even greater than here, and as such I have spent my time and energy to learn the necessary tools to build a modern industrialised state back there.
Nobody right now knows just what the hell you're actually doing to help "build a modern industrialized state" so please enlighten us.
1. Uh no, what I clearly said is that CERTAIN Hispanic CULTURAL PRACTICES in our society is inferior relative to the Anglicised ones left behind by the Americans.
Again, there is no basis there for racism, as I said and will say again, a person can survive without any culture, but cultures can't survive without people. Why do you think slavery still persists? Because there are still cultures out there that accept the PRACTICE as acceptable, this is just fact, not a racist testimony.
2. Uh no, an "Elitist" is someone who does everything in their power to maintain their power and makes others lower than themselves to ensure that status quo. I've clearly been doing the opposite, not that you'd know unless I tell you.
3. Refer to point 2. when discussing me being an "Elitist", as for my connections, so I make a lot of friends, that's not a bad thing, a person has more power the greater connections they have, no matter how poor you are, so long as you know someone you should easily be able to influence anything. Besides, I never gained my connections through wealth, I did what any normal person would do, go out and TALK to people, (Granted the fact that I can engage in polite conversation in 11 different languages was a real ice breaker, but that's an education point as opposed to wealth point.) that's how you make the connections.
4. Oh please, the Government has full control of Philippine resources at the end of the day, I mean I could make the same point about China technically owning millions of hectares of Philippine lands when Makapal ang Mukha Arroyo sold those farmlands during the Dark Ages but again, they are under PHILIPPINE JURISDICTION and can be taken back for whatever lawful reason. Stop whinging about the past and start worrying about actual problems that we face, like the fact that the Chinese OWN PHILIPPINE FARMS RIGHT NOW UNDER A PRO-CHINESE GOVERNMENT, you know the same Government that was elected by "smart" (yes I'm being sarcastic with the word "smart" just in case you were wondering) voters.
5. The shelling was a necessity, if you don't agree, why don't you go to Japan and burn down the Yasukuni Shrine, you know the shrine dedicated to the Japanese soldiers that killed us, bombed Manila despite the clearly visible sign saying OPEN CITY, and raped and plundered wherever they went. At the end of the day, if the Japanese left Manila as an Open City like what the Americans did, there would have been NO SHELLING, so get over it because otherwise your anger is misguided.
6. The numbers from the Philippine American War include figures from those who died from disease and famine, the tens of thousands that I'm talking about from the Marcos era include those who were those killed in starvation from proxy famines, and essentially those who are killed from the oh so lovely war in the south that Marcos STARTED.
7. It's called "STUDYING", I mean no offense, but I didn't choose Economics and Law for no reason, I see the benefits of implementing certain policies from overseas nations that are relatively more successful than us in the local scene. Also what have YOU contributed? Working in a local election and simply trying to survive with a relatively low wage does not an alleviation of poverty for our fellow citizens make... Well, at-least relative to the actions of the overseas community, at the end of the day the OFWs are called "BAYANI" for a reason.




