Drexel professor "ironically" promotes 'white genocide'
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2016 6:43 pm
Associate professor of politics and global studies at Drexel, George Ciccariello-Maher, decided to celebrate Christmas by deriding white people, as is a favoured passed time of many American social science professors these days. Except this time he decided to go no filter mode and just outright stated "all I want for Christmas is white genocide."
The professor went on to claim that he was merely mocking the idea of white genocide, which is in fact an imaginary concept, because white isn't a race. Except further confusion was added as he also applauded when "whites were massacred" during the Haitian Revolution:
Regarding this massacre, wikipedia reminds us that "squads of soldiers moved from house to house, torturing and killing entire families.[5] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[6] ".
After the University makes a statement claiming that those tweets were utterly reprehensible, the professor responds that everyone is just lacking proper context, and that his obvious flamebait is completely fine because of what is, to most people, undisclosed and ambiguous said context - which doesn't really explain his Haiti tweet, and is a different defence to claiming that the white race simply doesn't exist.
What are your thoughts on this situation, how should Drexel university handle this matter?
Link with more neutral summary
The professor went on to claim that he was merely mocking the idea of white genocide, which is in fact an imaginary concept, because white isn't a race. Except further confusion was added as he also applauded when "whites were massacred" during the Haitian Revolution:
Regarding this massacre, wikipedia reminds us that "squads of soldiers moved from house to house, torturing and killing entire families.[5] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[6] ".
After the University makes a statement claiming that those tweets were utterly reprehensible, the professor responds that everyone is just lacking proper context, and that his obvious flamebait is completely fine because of what is, to most people, undisclosed and ambiguous said context - which doesn't really explain his Haiti tweet, and is a different defence to claiming that the white race simply doesn't exist.
What are your thoughts on this situation, how should Drexel university handle this matter?
Link with more neutral summary