Of course it is, tyranny however is something to be opposed.
Advertisement

by Genivaria » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:13 pm

by The East Marches II » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:17 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Baltenstein wrote:Well, the Western Left did work long and hard to destroy its original connection with the Western working class.
Other way around. The working class used to stand with the oppressed and marginalized instead of demanding they be crushed like insects to suit some nostalgic jerk-off fantasy of the past.

by Aillyria » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:36 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

by Kubumba Tribe » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:39 pm
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.

by Northern Davincia » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:43 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

by New haven america » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:45 pm

by Hakons » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:54 pm

by Genivaria » Thu Jan 04, 2018 8:56 pm

by Hakons » Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:04 pm


by Aillyria » Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:23 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

by New haven america » Thu Jan 04, 2018 9:26 pm

by Aillyria » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:19 pm
New haven america wrote:Aillyria wrote:Eh....not quite, at least not how I understand it. I identify the term "freedom" with the concept of negative liberty, and "liberty" with positive liberty.
Freedom is the ability to speak, act, or think without hindrance or restraint. Liberty is being free within an area or society to act, speak, or think as one pleases (Or, to put it shortly: Being free, having freedom, etc...).
They're basically the same thing,
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".

by Pilarcraft » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:22 pm
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

by Salus Maior » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:30 pm

by Pilarcraft » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:32 pm
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

by Salus Maior » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:35 pm

by Salus Maior » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:39 pm
New haven america wrote:Aillyria wrote:Eh....not quite, at least not how I understand it. I identify the term "freedom" with the concept of negative liberty, and "liberty" with positive liberty.
Freedom is the ability to speak, act, or think without hindrance or restraint. Liberty is being free within an area or society to act, speak, or think as one pleases (Or, to put it shortly: Being free, having freedom, etc...).
They're basically the same thing.

by New haven america » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:46 pm
Salus Maior wrote:New haven america wrote:Freedom is the ability to speak, act, or think without hindrance or restraint. Liberty is being free within an area or society to act, speak, or think as one pleases (Or, to put it shortly: Being free, having freedom, etc...).
They're basically the same thing.
Except that nobody believes that people should be allowed the ability to speak or act without constraint. You can't yell 'FIRE' in a crowded building as a joke, you can't rally people into a mob to lynch a certain race, you can't slander people, etc.
In your definition freedom is incredibly undesirable.

by Pilarcraft » Thu Jan 04, 2018 10:48 pm
New haven america wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Except that nobody believes that people should be allowed the ability to speak or act without constraint. You can't yell 'FIRE' in a crowded building as a joke, you can't rally people into a mob to lynch a certain race, you can't slander people, etc.
In your definition freedom is incredibly undesirable.
You actually can do all those things, it's just that in most places you'll likely face some form of punishment afterwards.
You can still do those things though
B.P.D.: Dossier on parallel home-worlds released, will be updated regularly to include more encountered in the Convergence.

by Salus Maior » Thu Jan 04, 2018 11:16 pm
New haven america wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Except that nobody believes that people should be allowed the ability to speak or act without constraint. You can't yell 'FIRE' in a crowded building as a joke, you can't rally people into a mob to lynch a certain race, you can't slander people, etc.
In your definition freedom is incredibly undesirable.
You actually can do all those things, it's just that in most places you'll likely face some form of punishment afterwards.
You can still do those things though, and if you don't fear repercussions then there's nothing stopping you.

by Aellex » Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:30 am

by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:20 pm
Pilarcraft wrote:I honestly still don't have an answer on whether or not Islam finds Slavery Immoral or not, to be honest.
I am not asking you, the Muslims, whether or not you find it Immoral (I don't really care, but hope you all do find it immoral), but whether or not Islam and it's Shar' find it Immoral. Please, bring me reference from Sunnat and Quran for whatever your answers are.

by Bhikkustan » Fri Jan 05, 2018 1:48 pm
Salus Maior wrote:New haven america wrote:You actually can do all those things, it's just that in most places you'll likely face some form of punishment afterwards.
You can still do those things though, and if you don't fear repercussions then there's nothing stopping you.
That's law in general.
Likewise, if you're in Indonesia you can commit blasphemy. You'll just get punished for it afterwards most likely.

by El-Amin Caliphate » Fri Jan 05, 2018 4:03 pm
Al-Ismailiyya wrote:Pilarcraft wrote:I honestly still don't have an answer on whether or not Islam finds Slavery Immoral or not, to be honest.
I am not asking you, the Muslims, whether or not you find it Immoral (I don't really care, but hope you all do find it immoral), but whether or not Islam and it's Shar' find it Immoral. Please, bring me reference from Sunnat and Quran for whatever your answers are.
Quran 9:60 - "Zakah expenditures are only for the poor and for the needy and for those employed to collect [zakah] and for bringing hearts together [for Islam] and for freeing slaves and for those in debt and for the cause of Allah and for the [stranded] traveler - an obligation [imposed] by Allah . And Allah is Knowing and Wise."
5:89 - "Allah will not impose blame upon you for what is meaningless in your oaths, but He will impose blame upon you for [breaking] what you intended of oaths. So its expiation is the feeding of ten needy people from the average of that which you feed your [own] families or clothing them or the freeing of a slave. But whoever cannot find [or afford it] - then a fast of three days [is required]. That is the expiation for oaths when you have sworn. But guard your oaths. Thus does Allah make clear to you His verses that you may be grateful."
2:177 - "Righteousness is not that you turn your faces toward the east or the west, but [true] righteousness is [in] one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the angels, the Book, and the prophets and gives wealth, in spite of love for it, to relatives, orphans, the needy, the traveler, those who ask [for help], and for freeing slaves; [and who] establishes prayer and gives zakah; [those who] fulfill their promise when they promise; and [those who] are patient in poverty and hardship and during battle. Those are the ones who have been true, and it is those who are the righteous."
Quran 24:33 - "But let them who find not [the means for] marriage abstain [from sexual relations] until Allah enriches them from His bounty. And those who seek a contract [for eventual emancipation] from among whom your right hands possess - then make a contract with them if you know there is within them goodness and give them from the wealth of Allah which He has given you."
Quran 90:12-13 - "And what can make you know what is [breaking through] the difficult pass?
It is the freeing of a slave."

https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Al-Ismailiyya » Fri Jan 05, 2018 6:46 pm
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Al-Ismailiyya wrote:Quran 9:60 - "Zakah expenditures are only for the poor and for the needy and for those employed to collect [zakah] and for bringing hearts together [for Islam] and for freeing slaves and for those in debt and for the cause of Allah and for the [stranded] traveler - an obligation [imposed] by Allah . And Allah is Knowing and Wise."
5:89 - "Allah will not impose blame upon you for what is meaningless in your oaths, but He will impose blame upon you for [breaking] what you intended of oaths. So its expiation is the feeding of ten needy people from the average of that which you feed your [own] families or clothing them or the freeing of a slave. But whoever cannot find [or afford it] - then a fast of three days [is required]. That is the expiation for oaths when you have sworn. But guard your oaths. Thus does Allah make clear to you His verses that you may be grateful."
2:177 - "Righteousness is not that you turn your faces toward the east or the west, but [true] righteousness is [in] one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the angels, the Book, and the prophets and gives wealth, in spite of love for it, to relatives, orphans, the needy, the traveler, those who ask [for help], and for freeing slaves; [and who] establishes prayer and gives zakah; [those who] fulfill their promise when they promise; and [those who] are patient in poverty and hardship and during battle. Those are the ones who have been true, and it is those who are the righteous."
Quran 24:33 - "But let them who find not [the means for] marriage abstain [from sexual relations] until Allah enriches them from His bounty. And those who seek a contract [for eventual emancipation] from among whom your right hands possess - then make a contract with them if you know there is within them goodness and give them from the wealth of Allah which He has given you."
Quran 90:12-13 - "And what can make you know what is [breaking through] the difficult pass?
It is the freeing of a slave."
Assalamu 'Alaikum
Al-Islam does say that freeing slaves is a blessing and it's part of Shari'ah, but what Al-Islam does not say is that slavery is haram. That doesn't mean slaves should be mistreated though, as mistreatment of anyone is wrong and slaves shouldn't be burdened with more than they can bear. In short, slaves should be treated with kindness and honor.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bradfordville, Greater Miami Shores 3, Ifreann, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa
Advertisement