If their government endorsed that as a show of support, it stands to reason that some soldiers would have said it.
Advertisement
by Bhikkustan » Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:59 pm
by Aillyria » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:00 pm
Pilarcraft wrote:Aillyria wrote:Why would they do that?
See, for him to answer that without any intellectual dishonesty, he'd need to go read what the Shia believe, and then come and repeat it. or at the very least tell us his own interpretation of what the Shia told him.
but he isn't going to.
because he just wants to call the Shia Kuffar.
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:03 pm
Shurjah wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:How do you know? The video doesn't exist anymore.
And those are not Iranian soldiers, I believe.
You are exaggerating
I said Shiia militias which do follow Iranian ideology
If I said Nusra says Allahu Akbar you would not deny it but when I say Iranian militias do it you deny it is it because you realize how wrong it is to say Ya Zainab
by Shurjah » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:04 pm
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:Shurjah wrote:You are exaggerating
I said Shiia militias which do follow Iranian ideology
If I said Nusra says Allahu Akbar you would not deny it but when I say Iranian militias do it you deny it is it because you realize how wrong it is to say Ya Zainab
No, you didn't. The original conversation that spawned this before you expanded the goalposts, which is a logical fallacy, was about Iranian soldiers in the Iran-Iraq War.Bhikkustan wrote:If their government endorsed that as a show of support, it stands to reason that some soldiers would have said it.
I'm sure some soldiers said it. Not even going to deny that. There's a wrong minority in everything. But Shurjah would have it be held that the entire Iranian army shouted out to Hussain while the Iraqi invaders were pious, perfect soldiers and shouted out to Allah.
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:06 pm
Shurjah wrote:United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:No, you didn't. The original conversation that spawned this before you expanded the goalposts, which is a logical fallacy, was about Iranian soldiers in the Iran-Iraq War.
I'm sure some soldiers said it. Not even going to deny that. There's a wrong minority in everything. But Shurjah would have it be held that the entire Iranian army shouted out to Hussain while the Iraqi invaders were pious, perfect soldiers and shouted out to Allah.
GO read Kitab Al Kafi are you taking this personally because of your uncle? I do not know your uncle and maybe he did not say Ya whatever but others did
by Shurjah » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:07 pm
by The Eternal Aulus » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:08 pm
Aillyria wrote:I don't really have one, but I base alot of my beliefs on those of Rumi.....so idk.
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:08 pm
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:10 pm
by Aillyria » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:12 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:14 pm
by United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:15 pm
by Kubumba Tribe » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:19 pm
Farnhamia wrote:A word of advice from your friendly neighborhood Mod, be careful how you use "kafir." It's derogatory usage by some people can get you in trouble unless you are very careful in setting the context for it's use.
by The Eternal Aulus » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:24 pm
by Aillyria » Mon Nov 20, 2017 1:31 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Senegalboy » Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:11 pm
by Alsheb » Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:20 pm
by Aillyria » Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:51 pm
Alsheb wrote:Jeez guys, I've been away for a couple of hours, and I think there are literally 20+ more pages to the thread in that time alone?
Conserative Morality wrote:If RWDT were Romans, who would they be?
......
Aillyria would be Claudius. Temper + unwillingness to suffer fools + supporter of the P E O P L E + traditional legalist
West Oros wrote:GOD DAMMIT! I thought you wouldn't be here.
Well you aren't a real socialist. Just a sociopath disguised as one.
Not to mention that this thread split off from LWDT, so I assumed you would think this thread was a "revisionist hellhole".
by Hakons » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:35 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Elejamie, Elwher, Floofybit, Glorious Freedonia, Greater Cesnica, Kannap, Page, Plan Neonie, Rusrunia, Shearoa, The PIA, United States 2026, Valyxias, Zancostan, Zurkerx
Advertisement