HMS Vanguard wrote:This is a direct result of permitting Muslims to immigrate to Germany, a policy that should be ended and reversed.
[citation needed]
Advertisement
by Vassenor » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:43 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:This is a direct result of permitting Muslims to immigrate to Germany, a policy that should be ended and reversed.
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:44 am
by Vassenor » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:44 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:A lorry did not ram into a Berlin market. Lorries do not possess agency. Someone rammed a lorry into a Berlin market.
by Aelex » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:44 am
by Vassenor » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:45 am
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:45 am
by Knarkrike » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:46 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:Knarkrike wrote:I feel inclined to post this. This is a compilation of stats of all failed, foiled and completed terrorist attacks in Europe from 2006 to 2015. The sources of these tables, Europol's terrorism reports, can be found here. It shows the main motivations behind acts of terror and that religiously motivated attacks are among the lowest in numbers, falling behind separatist, not specified and left-wing terrorist attacks. With this, I hope the brave anti-Islam keyboard crusaders could take a little bit of a break from "religion of peace lololol" posts and get some perspective regarding terrorism for one goddamn second.
Conveniently failing to mention that in practically all of the non-Islamic attacks, no one got hurt, while in most of the Islamic attacks, large numbers of people died.
by Skylus » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:47 am
by Aelex » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:48 am
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:48 am
Knarkrike wrote:HMS Vanguard wrote:Conveniently failing to mention that in practically all of the non-Islamic attacks, no one got hurt, while in most of the Islamic attacks, large numbers of people died.
I'm sorry, what? I can't hear you from all the way at the top of my sources with you on nothing. Speak up!
by Vassenor » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:49 am
Aelex wrote:
Except we were talking in general and not on this particular case alone.
So please, try again explaining us who else but muslims cause Islamic Terrorism.
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:51 am
by Vassenor » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:52 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:This is a direct result of permitting Muslims to immigrate to Germany, a policy that should be ended and reversed.
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:54 am
by Aelex » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:54 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:Referring to my previous quoted post, your source is highly misleading for the already stated reasons.
by Itoshiki » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:56 am
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:00 am
Itoshiki wrote:
As I said, just do stricter vetting on refugees, arrest actual radicals, monitor extremist sermons, and prohibit Saudi funding to mosques without alienating Muslims as whole. Then take further actions against organizations that promote hatred against Muslims.
This is why policies not centered on tribalism tend to fail to gain public appeal.
by Ifreann » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:00 am
by Aelex » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:00 am
Itoshiki wrote:As I said, just do stricter vetting on refugees, arrest actual radicals, monitor extremist sermons, and prohibit Saudi funding to mosques without alienating Muslims as whole. Then take further actions against organizations that promote hatred against Muslims.
This is why policies not centered on tribalism tend to fail to gain public appeal.
by Itoshiki » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:02 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:Itoshiki wrote:As I said, just do stricter vetting on refugees, arrest actual radicals, monitor extremist sermons, and prohibit Saudi funding to mosques without alienating Muslims as whole. Then take further actions against organizations that promote hatred against Muslims.
This is why policies not centered on tribalism tend to fail to gain public appeal.
Or just not have Muslims. There are massive downsides of your plan for the government to outlaw political speech across the spectrum, establish an intrusive surveillance state, and kick down peoples' doors in the middle of the night, and even then often fail to stop attacks. What is the down side of not having Muslims?
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:02 am
Itoshiki wrote:HMS Vanguard wrote:Or just not have Muslims. There are massive downsides of your plan for the government to outlaw political speech across the spectrum, establish an intrusive surveillance state, and kick down peoples' doors in the middle of the night, and even then often fail to stop attacks. What is the down side of not having Muslims?
As in, expelling people personally identify or registered as Muslims?
by Ifreann » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:03 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:Itoshiki wrote:As I said, just do stricter vetting on refugees, arrest actual radicals, monitor extremist sermons, and prohibit Saudi funding to mosques without alienating Muslims as whole. Then take further actions against organizations that promote hatred against Muslims.
This is why policies not centered on tribalism tend to fail to gain public appeal.
Or just not have Muslims. There are massive downsides of your plan for the government to outlaw political speech across the spectrum, establish an intrusive surveillance state, and kick down peoples' doors in the middle of the night, and even then often fail to stop attacks. What is the down side of not having Muslims?
by HMS Vanguard » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:03 am
Ifreann wrote:HMS Vanguard wrote:Or just not have Muslims. There are massive downsides of your plan for the government to outlaw political speech across the spectrum, establish an intrusive surveillance state, and kick down peoples' doors in the middle of the night, and even then often fail to stop attacks. What is the down side of not having Muslims?
Well in order to not have Muslims you'd need an intrusive surveillance state and to kick down people's doors in the middle of the night and even then fail to remove all the Muslims.
by Organized States » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:03 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:Itoshiki wrote:As I said, just do stricter vetting on refugees, arrest actual radicals, monitor extremist sermons, and prohibit Saudi funding to mosques without alienating Muslims as whole. Then take further actions against organizations that promote hatred against Muslims.
This is why policies not centered on tribalism tend to fail to gain public appeal.
Or just not have Muslims. There are massive downsides of your plan for the government to outlaw political speech across the spectrum, establish an intrusive surveillance state, and kick down peoples' doors in the middle of the night, and even then often fail to stop attacks. What is the down side of not having Muslims?
by Itoshiki » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:04 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Atrito, Hidrandia, Ifreann, Kannap, Ravemath, Sarolandia, Statesburg, Valentine Z
Advertisement