Sure, but they haven't been doing anything like that. NASA hasn't exactly been leading the charge for a while now.
Advertisement
by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:00 pm
by Sanctissima » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:00 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Sanctissima wrote:
You realize privatization doesn't just magically fix things, right?
If anything, partially privatizing NASA set things back, both economically and scientifically. Economically because of the considerable loss of jobs, and scientifically because of the decreased funding for space exploration.
Sorry, can't hear you over the sound of first-stage rocket recovery and spaceplane development.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:02 pm
by Vassenor » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:08 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:10 pm
by The Rich Port » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:10 pm
Vassenor wrote:Why does everyone assume that privatisation is some sort of magic bullet?
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:11 pm
by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:12 pm
Formidable Opponent wrote:Here's some things I can say for certain:
The Left has done Trump a favor by setting the bar so low, that if he does nothing for 4 years
he'll look like a hero because they all made him seem like Hitler.
If he does anything with results you can see and chart, he will will re-election, and if he turns out alright, another republican will win in 8 years. Don't take this post to mean I don't have any concerns about Trump because of course I do, but this isn't about that. Just a few observations.
The SJW section of the Left is moving so FAR to the left and getting so loud that they are making populists and conservatives look calm and thoughtful in comparison, if this doesn't change they won't be able to ever win anything again.
They already lost 910 state legislature seats, 12 governorships, 69 seats in the house, 13 seats in the senate, and the presidency since Obama took office. In 2018, there are 23 democratic seats in the Senate up for re-election. 10 of them are almost guaranteed to flip because they are in states Trump won bigly.
If Trump does anything even remotely positive that can get visible results, more will flip. If they get 15, the Republicans will have a super-majority in the Senate. That's the situation you're in right now. I don't say this to gloat, I say this so that you can recognize it, accept it, and try to fix it.
The average age of Democrat Leaders in Congress is 78, Republican Leaders average 53 I think. This is a serious concern. If this new populism, or Trumpism or whatever you call it really takes hold with young people (and it is taking a big chunk, over 30% of 18-25s voted Republican), the Left will have a hard time winning anything because the oldest people are dying and the youngest Democratic leaders are people like Keith Ellison who is openly anti-semitic and has at least tertiary ties to Terrorists. Yes, Democrats, PLEASE make him the DNC chairman. Ok, now I'm gloating a little.
Now, for some suggestions. If the Left ever desires to win again, here's what you can do:
1. Get out to the flyover states, give them a voice, and ask them what they care about. You really need to do this, this is how Trump flipped 6 states from blue to red.
2. Drop the "identity politics" game, and talking about all these different minorities and oppressed people, and instead focus on equally-applied HUMAN rights. You accomplish the same goals, you aren't dividing the nation, and integration happens naturally. And you'd also regain some of the white vote. Unless of course, dividing the nation IS your goal, in which case, keep it up!
3. Try to become a "party of the people" because that title stopped applying in 1993.
4. Stop calling everyone you disagree with racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, islamophobic bigots. It obviously doesn't work when the person you're talking to is none of those things. I'd venture a guess that many of the 7 million people that stayed home and didn't vote last year did so because of that, and Hillary's "Deplorables" comment gave trump more votes, hands down.
5. Stay far, far, far away from Marxist Socialism always
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:20 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Vassenor wrote:Why does everyone assume that privatisation is some sort of magic bullet?
People that just don't understand how logistics work.
What really pisses me off is that NASA does most of the legwork when it comes to the serious stuff, like researching and reports and space forecasting, while the private companies reap their benefits without doing much of anything besides blasting tourists into space. I haven't seen any serious research projects from them or any serious expeditions in the works...
by Vassenor » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:21 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
People that just don't understand how logistics work.
What really pisses me off is that NASA does most of the legwork when it comes to the serious stuff, like researching and reports and space forecasting, while the private companies reap their benefits without doing much of anything besides blasting tourists into space. I haven't seen any serious research projects from them or any serious expeditions in the works...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvqO1dYeJo0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPGUQySBikQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplan ... ort_System
by The Rich Port » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:23 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
People that just don't understand how logistics work.
What really pisses me off is that NASA does most of the legwork when it comes to the serious stuff, like researching and reports and space forecasting, while the private companies reap their benefits without doing much of anything besides blasting tourists into space. I haven't seen any serious research projects from them or any serious expeditions in the works...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvqO1dYeJo0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPGUQySBikQ
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplan ... ort_System
by Gauthier » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:27 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Vassenor wrote:Why does everyone assume that privatisation is some sort of magic bullet?
People that just don't understand how logistics work.
What really pisses me off is that NASA does most of the legwork when it comes to the serious stuff, like researching and reports and space forecasting, while the private companies reap their benefits without doing much of anything besides blasting tourists into space. I haven't seen any serious research projects from them or any serious expeditions in the works, just catering to the obscenely rich.
Richard Garriott at least did some serious work while he was on the International Space Station.
by The Rich Port » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:29 pm
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:29 pm
The Rich Port wrote:To be fair, I'm not for banning private space programs. I just want NASA back.
by Gauthier » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:30 pm
The Rich Port wrote:To be fair, I'm not for banning private space programs. I just want NASA back.
by The Rich Port » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:32 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:32 pm
by Vassenor » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:33 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Vassenor wrote:
And? Remember, it took NASA over a decade to go from Explorer One to Apollo 11.
And in forty years their innovation from Apollo 11 was bigger rockets and a shitty shuttle system that shouldn't have been used in the first place.The Rich Port wrote:
Experimental drones...
by Trumpostan » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:34 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Vassenor wrote:Why does everyone assume that privatisation is some sort of magic bullet?
People that just don't understand how logistics work.
What really pisses me off is that NASA does most of the legwork when it comes to the serious stuff, like researching and reports and space forecasting, while the private companies reap their benefits without doing much of anything besides blasting tourists into space. I haven't seen any serious research projects from them or any serious expeditions in the works, just catering to the obscenely rich.
Richard Garriott at least did some serious work while he was on the International Space Station.
by The Rich Port » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:35 pm
Trumpostan wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
People that just don't understand how logistics work.
What really pisses me off is that NASA does most of the legwork when it comes to the serious stuff, like researching and reports and space forecasting, while the private companies reap their benefits without doing much of anything besides blasting tourists into space. I haven't seen any serious research projects from them or any serious expeditions in the works, just catering to the obscenely rich.
Richard Garriott at least did some serious work while he was on the International Space Station.
I believe its practically akin to a religious belief, the idea that the private sector will make everything better if you just believe it hard enough.
There's tons of stuff like in medicine and also the internet that wouldn't have seen the light of day if it had been left to the private sector.
by The Black Forrest » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:36 pm
by Gauthier » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:39 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:41 pm
by Gauthier » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:43 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Vassenor wrote:
And you know the private sector will do better... how?
NASA lower-stage retrievals since inception: 0
Private sector lower-stage retrievals since inception (2002 or 2011, depending on whether you wish to base it off of company founding or the program beginning): 6
Though, perhaps a better metric would be
NASA ideas to recover rocket stages since inception: 0
Private sector ideas to recover and reuse rocket stages since inception: At least 3 (SpaceX, Blue Origin and Sierra Nevada)
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:43 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Vassenor wrote:
And you know the private sector will do better... how?
NASA lower-stage retrievals since inception: 0
Private sector lower-stage retrievals since inception (2002 or 2011, depending on whether you wish to base it off of company founding or the program beginning): 6
Though, perhaps a better metric would be
NASA ideas to recover rocket stages since inception: 0
Private sector ideas to recover and reuse rocket stages since inception: At least 3 (SpaceX, Blue Origin and Sierra Nevada)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Awqnia, Bienenhalde, Camtropia, Duvniask, Floofybit, Herador, Hidrandia, Jerzylvania, Liberal Malaysia, Nu Elysium, Outer Bratorke, Pale Dawn, Reformed Imperial Russia, Rusozak, Simonia, Singaporen Empire, Tiami
Advertisement