Trump MAGAthread II: Donald and Mike go to the White House

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Have you ever had everything you owned stripped away from you by the government, and then been thrown in a concentration camp for years, simply because of your ethnicity?

And?

Are you saying that's not wrong on a moral sense?

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Earth Day will probably be done away with, since Trump doesn't think climate change exists.

Wasn't there a counter-Earth Day event organised before? Where they turned on every electrical device possible. Think it was called Human Achievement Day or some other such bollocks. Maybe that will be the new official day...

That was counter earth hour.

"Human Achievement Hour" is what they called it.

[Balkenreich]

And?

Are you saying that's not wrong on a moral sense?

Wrong in a moral and a logistical sense.

but comparing that to the Atrocities committed by the Japanese Empire and Nazi Germany?

Apples to oranges.

[Balkenreich]

Wasn't there a counter-Earth Day event organised before? Where they turned on every electrical device possible. Think it was called Human Achievement Day or some other such bollocks. Maybe that will be the new official day...

That was counter earth hour.

"Human Achievement Hour" is what they called it.

Neat.

[Camicon]

Maybe don't talk shit about something that you have no frame of reference for.

And?

Is there something you did not understand about what I said?

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Are you saying that's not wrong on a moral sense?

Wrong in a moral and a logistical sense.

but comparing that to the Atrocities committed by the Japanese Empire and Nazi Germany?

Apples to oranges.

The point here is that it is wrong to do so. It wrong to take away rights to non criminal US citizens.

It is wrong.

[Balkenreich]

Wrong in a moral and a logistical sense.

but comparing that to the Atrocities committed by the Japanese Empire and Nazi Germany?

Apples to oranges.

The point here is that it is wrong to do so. It wrong to take away rights to non criminal US citizens.

It is wrong.

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

[Camicon]

The point here is that it is wrong to do so. It wrong to take away rights to non criminal US citizens.

It is wrong.

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Hundreds of thousands of citizens who happen to be of the same ethnicity as the people who attacked them, not 'possible spies'. The American government didn't shuffle off Caucasians into concentration camps when they started fighting the Nazi's, they didn't label them all as 'possible spies' simply because they had fair skin.

[Balkenreich]

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Hundreds of thousands of citizens who happen to be of the same ethnicity as the people who attacked them, not 'possible spies'. The American government didn't shuffle off Caucasians into concentration camps when they started fighting the Nazi's, they didn't label them all as 'possible spies' simply because they had fair skin.

you have the first world war to thank for that.

[Camicon]

Hundreds of thousands of citizens who happen to be of the same ethnicity as the people who attacked them, not 'possible spies'. The American government didn't shuffle off Caucasians into concentration camps when they started fighting the Nazi's, they didn't label them all as 'possible spies' simply because they had fair skin.

you have the first world war to thank for that.

My points stand.

[Vassenor]

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Hundreds of thousands of citizens who happen to be of the same ethnicity as the people who attacked them, not 'possible spies'. The American government didn't shuffle off Caucasians into concentration camps when they started fighting the Nazi's, they didn't label them all as 'possible spies' simply because they had fair skin.

Even people like Henry Ford who had openly endorsed the Nazi regime.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

The point here is that it is wrong to do so. It wrong to take away rights to non criminal US citizens.

It is wrong.

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

[Washington Resistance Army]

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

We probably should have

[Balkenreich]

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

We probably should have

Oh you.

*boops*

We would just break out with our Maple syrup powers.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

Didn't work in Vietnam, wouldn't have worked then.

[Vassenor]

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

Which would be hypocritical considering the impressment of American citizens into British service was one of the causes of the war.

[Farnhamia]

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

Which would be hypocritical considering the impressment of American citizens into British service was one of the causes of the war.

It would have confused the British long enough for the US to capture most of Canada, though.

[Balkenreich]

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

Didn't work in Vietnam, wouldn't have worked then.

Thats what the English shouldve learned.

[Chestaan]

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

Which would be hypocritical considering the impressment of American citizens into British service was one of the causes of the war.

But since when has hypocrisy ever stopped the US military?

[Soldati Senza Confini]

yes.

However, put yourself in their shoes.

As in the American government.

You have sustained an attack, you have hundreds of thousands of possible spies and paranoia of the american public is probably at an all time high.

Study some propaganda, some images pictured them as possible spies and collaborators which probably influenced some policy making on their part.

which is a shame, could've used some good recruits.

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

It may be morally wrong, but governments don't care about morals but about expediency.

Never underestimate the will and power of your own government in fucking you over for being on the wrong side of the political fence.

[Balkenreich]

Simple solution.

Press them into service in the US navy.

Which would be hypocritical considering the impressment of American citizens into British service was one of the causes of the war.

Nope.

What matters is that your shitty guns had cannon balls that bounced off our Hulls.

USA!
S
A!

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Didn't work in Vietnam, wouldn't have worked then.

Thats what the English shouldve learned.

The doctor wasn't around then to tell them that was a bad idea.

[Balkenreich]

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

It may be morally wrong, but governments don't care about morals but about expediency.

Never underestimate the will and power of your own government in fucking you over for being on the wrong side of the political fence.

Yep.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Still makes it wrong.

Nothing can justify it.

When 1812 happened, you didn't put all Canadian's in camps.

It may be morally wrong, but governments don't care about morals but about expediency.

Never underestimate the will and power of your own government in fucking you over for being on the wrong side of the political fence.

It was a waste of time and money.