Lavochkin wrote:If you'll do the same, I'll ignore my first 2 arguments since I could easily counter your arguments with that you made it purposely vague or left it to interpretation, but that would be off-topic.
What are you talking about? I didn't make anything purposefully vague or open to interpretation.
Lavochkin wrote:"I just linked to whatever showed up on Google. I'm not interested in defending the sources, because that'd be really boring. There are many others, if you want to go looking yourself. I didn't have to present anything. My statement that "millennials are not especially entitled" is a null hypothesis. You've provided no contradicting evidence, so I am entirely justified in maintaining the null hypothesis even if I assume you're right about those articles I linked to."
Defending why millennials aren't entitled was a lot easier than defending why they are since I gave you no criteria for why they are entitled. However I now will because there are many reasons why:
1. They want job promotions despite no experience and believe a college education is all that is needed.
2. They complain when degrees like a liberal arts degree fail to find them a job.
3. Millennials were raised with a "everybody's a winner" mentality. If they don't get 1st place, they feel they got last place.
4. Reliance on technology makes them incapable of working without it.
5. They lack patience and want everything now because they were raised with technology that created near instant results.
Of course millennials will deny this and since they make up the majority of the workforce, articles on it slimming down. However ask any business owners (even millennial business owners) and they will describe their issues and many evidence still exist.
Lavochkin wrote:"You said that Santa "eventually" leads to a welfare state."
BECAUSE...
not "Santa leads to a welfare state".
I don't know what you're trying to say here.