Of all the arguments I have made, you address the statement I meant as a joke? Youre reaching new lows here
Advertisement

by Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:10 pm

by New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:12 pm
Aboveland wrote:>enters thread
>sees womyn instead of women to prevent saying men
>laughs hysterically

by Uinted Communist of Africa » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:12 pm

by Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:13 pm
Squidysquid wrote:Camaalbakrius wrote:Toxic masculinities? Man hate. Thats all ot is. Dont try to deny it.
I personally think toxic masculinity is a thing, and a bad thing. I've seen guys go through so much pressure to conform to "masculinity" that they end up breaking down. There are a ton of good qualities in being masculine, that's so true, but toxic masculinity is the type of masculinity that, for example, makes it harder for men to want to admit or get help for depression or another mental health issue, and receive help for it, or for male rape and domestic abuse victims to share their experiences without being called "weak" There's not a lot of pressure for women to be either masculine or feminine, but for men there's still a lot of pressure to be masculine, and they get laughed at for being feminine. Why would you be against that?

by Chessmistress » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:13 pm
New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?
Sexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.
Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].
Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.

by Mergloria » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:14 pm

by Uinted Communist of Africa » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:16 pm
Mergloria wrote:This whole thing is fucking retarded and feminism needs to die before it fully bleeds into our government and turns the U.S. into a modern patriarchy where men aren't even allowed to call their female partners "baby" because it signifies weakness and is considered an insult to Her Highness.

by New Axiom » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:16 pm
Chessmistress wrote:New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/SexismSexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.
Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].
Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.

by New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:17 pm
Chessmistress wrote:New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/SexismSexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.
Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].
Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

by Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:18 pm
Chessmistress wrote:New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/SexismSexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.
Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].
Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

by Proctopeo » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm
Chessmistress wrote:New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/SexismSexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.
Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].
Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.
sexism
NOUN
[mass noun] Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex
1
: prejudice or discrimination based on sex

by Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm
New haven america wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.
Even though what you stated is blatantly false, has it ever crossed your mind that maybe a large portion of women don't like working out or going to the gym?

by Greater Slavic Union » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm
Greater Slavic Union wrote:There are two types of discrimination, and one of these types is called "Structural Discrimination". It means that something which is made in order to give equality actually discriminates, an example could be the minimum height for people to serve in a military: if this is put at, let's say, 1,90 meters, then most of women are going to be excluded, even in a country with a high women-height average.
This proposal of some women-only hour(s) in university gyms is, indeed, a Structural Discrimination, as it:
a. Creates different times for the two genders, thus SEPARATING them
b. Makes impossible to men to train in certain hours of the day.
c. Highly encourages women to train ONLY during such hours, thus DESCORAGING them to it in mixed hours, lowering the number doing so, and creating a sort of "training ghetto".
Now I am going to ask you something: white people may be intimidated by a huge group of black people training, as they have higher muscular mass and son. Would we put whites-only hour(s) at the gym? No. Then should it happen for women? If this happened some 100 years ago, feminists would have been saying "GIVE MIXED HOURS!" "NO MORE SEPARATION IN GYMS!" and so on.
So no, No, NO!

by White Chrobatia » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm

by Blue Pinkerton » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:20 pm
New haven america wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.
Even though what you stated is blatantly false, has it ever crossed your mind that maybe a large portion of women don't like working out or going to the gym?

by Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:21 pm
Proctopeo wrote:Chessmistress wrote:
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.
Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism
Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.
>rationalwiki
I see your biased source and raise you the dictionary.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexismsexism
NOUN
[mass noun] Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex
Note the use of the word typically - that is, not just against women. And if the OED alone isn't enough for you,
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism1
: prejudice or discrimination based on sex
I left out the "especially", but mostly so I didn't have to go and italicize it.

by New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:22 pm
Mergloria wrote:I can't believe this even exists.

by Squidysquid » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:22 pm
Camaalbakrius wrote:Squidysquid wrote:
I personally think toxic masculinity is a thing, and a bad thing. I've seen guys go through so much pressure to conform to "masculinity" that they end up breaking down. There are a ton of good qualities in being masculine, that's so true, but toxic masculinity is the type of masculinity that, for example, makes it harder for men to want to admit or get help for depression or another mental health issue, and receive help for it, or for male rape and domestic abuse victims to share their experiences without being called "weak" There's not a lot of pressure for women to be either masculine or feminine, but for men there's still a lot of pressure to be masculine, and they get laughed at for being feminine. Why would you be against that?
Does toxic feminism exist? Do they teach that there is a toxic part of being feminine in the same way that there is toxic parts of being masculine? Im being serious, because if it is true, then I have never heard it. If not, then it seems that when they came up with the idea, they had "men" specifically in mind

by Proctopeo » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:22 pm
Camaalbakrius wrote:Proctopeo wrote:>rationalwiki
I see your biased source and raise you the dictionary.
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism
Note the use of the word typically - that is, not just against women. And if the OED alone isn't enough for you,
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism
I left out the "especially", but mostly so I didn't have to go and italicize it.
Your Oxford English Dictionary will mean nothing compared to her 5 second google search am I right?

by White Chrobatia » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:24 pm

by Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:25 pm
Squidysquid wrote:Camaalbakrius wrote:Does toxic feminism exist? Do they teach that there is a toxic part of being feminine in the same way that there is toxic parts of being masculine? Im being serious, because if it is true, then I have never heard it. If not, then it seems that when they came up with the idea, they had "men" specifically in mind
See, I've never actually heard someone calling it toxic femininity, but think: being called girly or saying someone does something "like a girl" is considered insulting, and many women (especially in gender studies, which is a stupid course) are taught that being feminine is undesirable or bad. If a girl is suicidal or self-harms, often she may be afraid to get because people will accuse her of being a drama whore.
I'd say it does exist, but no one ever calls it "toxic femininity" like we do with "toxic masculinity"

by New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:25 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, American Legionaries, Dakran, Greater Somoiland, Kubra, Nantoraka, Quebecshire, Shrillland, The Two Jerseys, Violetist Britannia, World Anarchic Union
Advertisement