NATION

PASSWORD

Should a women-only hour at the gym be the standard policy?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:10 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:Men cant make arguments because patriarchy


Dr. Benjamin Woo of Journalism and Communications will speak on: Angry Young Nerds: Geek Culture and Toxic Masculinities. November 29, 2016 1:00-2:20 Room 2017DT


I guess that Dr. Benjamin Woo is a man. A good ally.

Of all the arguments I have made, you address the statement I meant as a joke? Youre reaching new lows here
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:12 pm

Aboveland wrote:>enters thread
>sees womyn instead of women to prevent saying men
>laughs hysterically

The ironic part is that back about 150+ years ago, people used to spell "Women" as "Womyn" to try to separate them from men, who at the time were considered stronger, smarter, and worth more socially and economically than women. It was a spelling used to show that females are worth less than males are.

And Chess is voluntarily using Womyn.
Last edited by New haven america on Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Uinted Communist of Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 2451
Founded: Sep 28, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Uinted Communist of Africa » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:12 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:Men cant make arguments because patriarchy


Dr. Benjamin Woo of Journalism and Communications will speak on: Angry Young Nerds: Geek Culture and Toxic Masculinities. November 29, 2016 1:00-2:20 Room 2017DT


I guess that Dr. Benjamin Woo is a man. A good ally.

Image
Last edited by Uinted Communist of Africa on Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
[_★_] copy and paste. Join the revolution!!!! Stats are for the mentally advanced...change my mind.
( -_- ) My nation does support my political views...deal with it.

"We do not want a single foot of foreign territory; but of our territory we shall not surrender a single inch to anyone." - Joseph Stalin, 1930

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:13 pm

Squidysquid wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:Toxic masculinities? Man hate. Thats all ot is. Dont try to deny it.


I personally think toxic masculinity is a thing, and a bad thing. I've seen guys go through so much pressure to conform to "masculinity" that they end up breaking down. There are a ton of good qualities in being masculine, that's so true, but toxic masculinity is the type of masculinity that, for example, makes it harder for men to want to admit or get help for depression or another mental health issue, and receive help for it, or for male rape and domestic abuse victims to share their experiences without being called "weak" There's not a lot of pressure for women to be either masculine or feminine, but for men there's still a lot of pressure to be masculine, and they get laughed at for being feminine. Why would you be against that?

Does toxic feminism exist? Do they teach that there is a toxic part of being feminine in the same way that there is toxic parts of being masculine? Im being serious, because if it is true, then I have never heard it. If not, then it seems that when they came up with the idea, they had "men" specifically in mind
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Chessmistress
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5161
Founded: Mar 16, 2015
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Chessmistress » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:13 pm

New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?


You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism

Sexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.

Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].

Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.


Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.
OOC:
Radical Feminist, caring about the oppressed gender, that's why I have a strong sense of justice.

PRO:
Radical Feminism (proudly SWERF - moderately TERF),
Gender abolitionism,
birth control and population control,
affirmative ongoing VERBAL consent,
death penalty for rapists.

AGAINST:
patriarchy,
pornography,
heteronormativity,
domestic violence and femicide.


Favorite Quotes: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ches ... /id=403173

User avatar
Mergloria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mergloria » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:14 pm

This whole thing is fucking retarded and feminism needs to die before it fully bleeds into our government and turns the U.S. into a modern patriarchy where men aren't even allowed to call their female partners "baby" because it signifies weakness and is considered an insult to Her Highness.
Last edited by Mergloria on Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Uinted Communist of Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 2451
Founded: Sep 28, 2016
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Uinted Communist of Africa » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:16 pm

Mergloria wrote:This whole thing is fucking retarded and feminism needs to die before it fully bleeds into our government and turns the U.S. into a modern patriarchy where men aren't even allowed to call their female partners "baby" because it signifies weakness and is considered an insult to Her Highness.

Every one here was trying to AVOID out right saying it!!!
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
[_★_] copy and paste. Join the revolution!!!! Stats are for the mentally advanced...change my mind.
( -_- ) My nation does support my political views...deal with it.

"We do not want a single foot of foreign territory; but of our territory we shall not surrender a single inch to anyone." - Joseph Stalin, 1930

User avatar
New Axiom
Minister
 
Posts: 2045
Founded: Aug 22, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Axiom » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:16 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?


You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism

Sexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.

Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].

Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.


Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.


A women only policy is discriminative against men, since it doesn't allow them to use the gym when they would otherwise be able to. So it is sexist.
Everyone has a plan until the New Axiom Imperial Army comes. Then everyone is just like, omigawd. Run.

My favorite user quotes:
Zakuvia wrote:If you aren't imagining a chain gang of adorable old retirees building a wall with Fixodent and using their Hoverounds as tow trucks then you're not the NS I remember.


Ethel mermania wrote:
New Axiom wrote:
You mean Black Friday as in the Apex Preadator of Capatalism?

Victory is measured in gi Joe dolls and easy bake ovens. It was not old age that killed castro, it was nintendo.


Pringles or Lays Stax? I prefer the Lays.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:17 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?


You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism

Sexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.

Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].

Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.


Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

Even though what you stated is blatantly false, has it ever crossed your mind that maybe a large portion of women don't like working out or going to the gym?

Oh, who the fuck am I kidding? No you didn't, that's too logical of an idea.
Last edited by New haven america on Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:18 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?


You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism

Sexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.

Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].

Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.


Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

Heres the flaw in your logic: if you think women should have time at the gym without men because it is male dominated, then you should encourage more women to go to the gym. It isnt like women arent allowed there. If rhere are more men at the gym, then it is probably because more men would rather be at the gym than women. If they dont want to go in the first place, then having the only woman hour would be pointless
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12369
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm

Chessmistress wrote:
New Axiom wrote:Can I say no, becuase this is sexist?


You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism

Sexism is discrimination against people due to their perceived gender, biological sex, or both. Sexism can take the form of blatant discrimination such as only assuming men are qualified to do particular work, or thinking women are best at home with the children, or far more subtle views about the value of particular genders as friends, co-workers, or simple humans.

Far and away, women experience the most blatant forms of sexism, the most outright of which is pure misogyny. While not legally barred from any particular position in the "Western world", women face extreme discrimination in positions of power such as political office, upper management in corporations, the medical field and academic fields. Even such areas as publication, directing television or movies, or being recognized for personal achievements show marked discrimination against women in those areas. In the United States, 31% of women have claimed harassment by co-workers including superiors [2], compared to 7% of men in the workplace, though this number is growing as women move into more positions of power[3].

Discrimination against men is not unheard of, though it's uncommon and is somewhat different from that which is experienced by women. Men, traditionally, experience this kind of discrimination when they attempt to step into traditionally female roles, such as nurses, elementary teachers or stay-at-home parents. Men also fare somewhat poorly in child custody battles, since it is still a common practice to give children to the mother unless the father can show clear reasons why this is a bad choice.


Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

>rationalwiki
I see your biased source and raise you the dictionary.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism

sexism
NOUN

[mass noun] Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex

Note the use of the word typically - that is, not just against women. And if the OED alone isn't enough for you,

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism

1
: prejudice or discrimination based on sex


I left out the "especially", but mostly so I didn't have to go and italicize it.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm

New haven america wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism



Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

Even though what you stated is blatantly false, has it ever crossed your mind that maybe a large portion of women don't like working out or going to the gym?

Of course not. That would prove her point wrong
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
Greater Slavic Union
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6516
Founded: Mar 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Slavic Union » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm

Greater Slavic Union wrote:There are two types of discrimination, and one of these types is called "Structural Discrimination". It means that something which is made in order to give equality actually discriminates, an example could be the minimum height for people to serve in a military: if this is put at, let's say, 1,90 meters, then most of women are going to be excluded, even in a country with a high women-height average.

This proposal of some women-only hour(s) in university gyms is, indeed, a Structural Discrimination, as it:
a. Creates different times for the two genders, thus SEPARATING them
b. Makes impossible to men to train in certain hours of the day.
c. Highly encourages women to train ONLY during such hours, thus DESCORAGING them to it in mixed hours, lowering the number doing so, and creating a sort of "training ghetto".

Now I am going to ask you something: white people may be intimidated by a huge group of black people training, as they have higher muscular mass and son. Would we put whites-only hour(s) at the gym? No. Then should it happen for women? If this happened some 100 years ago, feminists would have been saying "GIVE MIXED HOURS!" "NO MORE SEPARATION IN GYMS!" and so on.

So no, No, NO!
Official Name: ZápadoSłováńský Králevství
Population: 124.480.112

King: Král Michal I Kolovrát
Population growth: 2,3%

Queen: Královna Klaudia Katmařková-Kolovrátová
PPP GDP: 5.848 billion SK (Slavic Krunas)

Heirs: Crown Prince Oleg, Crown Princess Sylvia,
Warsaw Dukess Oksana, Prince of Prague Paveł
Nominal GDP: 3.868 billion USD

Current Royal Family: Kolovrát House
Fertility Index: 2,1 childs per woman

User avatar
White Chrobatia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 529
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby White Chrobatia » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:19 pm

Tbh I feel like there should be a woman-only hour (or even a few hours) but also that there should be man-only hours too.

Well what I actually believe is that the government shouldn't intervene and instead gyms should choose this stuff on their own, but that I would preferably go to a gym that is woman-only or has woman-only hours.
Bijelihrvatska
Warning: If posting past 7pm, there's probably alcohol in my system

Since these seem popular here...
    - Biological Female
    - University student
    - Miao(Hmong) and Croatian
    - Nominally Catholic, though effectively irreligious Now a practicing Buddhist!
    - I thought I was a libertarian, but my average after three compass tests was +5.38 Econ, +0.82 Social. Hi.
    - Sexually confused
Curious about anything, just ask.
The Rainbow Kingdom wrote:
White Chrobatia wrote:Are we humans?

Or are we dancers?


I thought we were French :p

User avatar
Blue Pinkerton
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 43
Founded: Nov 05, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Blue Pinkerton » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:20 pm

New haven america wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism



Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

Even though what you stated is blatantly false, has it ever crossed your mind that maybe a large portion of women don't like working out or going to the gym?


What kind of counter-argument is this? Try harder.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.67

GAYGAYGAY

User avatar
Mergloria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mergloria » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:21 pm

I can't believe this even exists.

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:21 pm

Proctopeo wrote:
Chessmistress wrote:
You can say "no", but your explanation isn't good.

Even if we accept the idea that sexism against men can be a thing, still it isn't sexism:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Sexism



Gyms are already male-dominated.
Hence why a single hour in order to promote women participation is the very opposite of sexism.

>rationalwiki
I see your biased source and raise you the dictionary.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism

sexism
NOUN

[mass noun] Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex

Note the use of the word typically - that is, not just against women. And if the OED alone isn't enough for you,

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism

1
: prejudice or discrimination based on sex


I left out the "especially", but mostly so I didn't have to go and italicize it.

Your Oxford English Dictionary will mean nothing compared to her 5 second google search am I right?
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:22 pm

Mergloria wrote:I can't believe this even exists.

Get used to it. *Nod*

Welcome to NS, you'll be here forever.
Last edited by New haven america on Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Squidysquid
Secretary
 
Posts: 26
Founded: Jul 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Squidysquid » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:22 pm

Camaalbakrius wrote:
Squidysquid wrote:
I personally think toxic masculinity is a thing, and a bad thing. I've seen guys go through so much pressure to conform to "masculinity" that they end up breaking down. There are a ton of good qualities in being masculine, that's so true, but toxic masculinity is the type of masculinity that, for example, makes it harder for men to want to admit or get help for depression or another mental health issue, and receive help for it, or for male rape and domestic abuse victims to share their experiences without being called "weak" There's not a lot of pressure for women to be either masculine or feminine, but for men there's still a lot of pressure to be masculine, and they get laughed at for being feminine. Why would you be against that?

Does toxic feminism exist? Do they teach that there is a toxic part of being feminine in the same way that there is toxic parts of being masculine? Im being serious, because if it is true, then I have never heard it. If not, then it seems that when they came up with the idea, they had "men" specifically in mind


See, I've never actually heard someone calling it toxic femininity, but think: being called girly or saying someone does something "like a girl" is considered insulting, and many women (especially in gender studies, which is a stupid course) are taught that being feminine is undesirable or bad. If a girl is suicidal or self-harms, often she may be afraid to get because people will accuse her of being a drama whore.

I'd say it does exist, but no one ever calls it "toxic femininity" like we do with "toxic masculinity"

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12369
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:22 pm

Camaalbakrius wrote:
Proctopeo wrote:>rationalwiki
I see your biased source and raise you the dictionary.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/sexism


Note the use of the word typically - that is, not just against women. And if the OED alone isn't enough for you,

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sexism



I left out the "especially", but mostly so I didn't have to go and italicize it.

Your Oxford English Dictionary will mean nothing compared to her 5 second google search am I right?

Everyone knows that the dictionary is sexist. [/sarcasm]
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
White Chrobatia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 529
Founded: Dec 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby White Chrobatia » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:24 pm

New haven america wrote:
Mergloria wrote:I can't believe this even exists.

Get used to it. *Nod*

Yeah, Heaven help us if we try to even the playing field.
Bijelihrvatska
Warning: If posting past 7pm, there's probably alcohol in my system

Since these seem popular here...
    - Biological Female
    - University student
    - Miao(Hmong) and Croatian
    - Nominally Catholic, though effectively irreligious Now a practicing Buddhist!
    - I thought I was a libertarian, but my average after three compass tests was +5.38 Econ, +0.82 Social. Hi.
    - Sexually confused
Curious about anything, just ask.
The Rainbow Kingdom wrote:
White Chrobatia wrote:Are we humans?

Or are we dancers?


I thought we were French :p

User avatar
Mergloria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mergloria » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:24 pm

I blame premature dementia for this idea even coming to fruition.

User avatar
Camaalbakrius
Minister
 
Posts: 2866
Founded: Sep 09, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Camaalbakrius » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:25 pm

Squidysquid wrote:
Camaalbakrius wrote:Does toxic feminism exist? Do they teach that there is a toxic part of being feminine in the same way that there is toxic parts of being masculine? Im being serious, because if it is true, then I have never heard it. If not, then it seems that when they came up with the idea, they had "men" specifically in mind


See, I've never actually heard someone calling it toxic femininity, but think: being called girly or saying someone does something "like a girl" is considered insulting, and many women (especially in gender studies, which is a stupid course) are taught that being feminine is undesirable or bad. If a girl is suicidal or self-harms, often she may be afraid to get because people will accuse her of being a drama whore.

I'd say it does exist, but no one ever calls it "toxic femininity" like we do with "toxic masculinity"

Then my point still stands.
Catholic Mentlegen

DEUS VULT INFIDELS
Favorite bands: Bon Jovi, Guns 'N Roses, basically anything by Eric Clapton, Queen, AC/DC, a few songs by KISS, but I don't care much for the face paint.


Not really a politics person, I don't care much about it.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43462
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:25 pm

White Chrobatia wrote:
New haven america wrote:Get used to it. *Nod*

Yeah, Heaven help us if we try to even the playing field.

So you support Segregation?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Mergloria
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Nov 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mergloria » Sun Dec 04, 2016 5:26 pm

White Chrobatia wrote:
New haven america wrote:Get used to it. *Nod*

Yeah, Heaven help us if we try to even the playing field.

You call THIS "evening the playing field?" Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! :clap: :rofl:

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, American Legionaries, Dakran, Greater Somoiland, Kubra, Nantoraka, Quebecshire, Shrillland, The Two Jerseys, Violetist Britannia, World Anarchic Union

Advertisement

Remove ads