NATION

PASSWORD

Transgender Discussion Thread III: Vote in our poll!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should the first subtitle of our next thread be?

Trans Men Are Not Women
23
24%
Anti-Cistamines
10
10%
Please Don't Deadnaming Eve
3
3%
Is This Destroying My Free Speech
8
8%
We Know More About This Than You
11
11%
HRT And Crumpets
26
27%
Pro-Nouns & Anti-Verbs
16
16%
 
Total votes : 97

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:42 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I find it funny how you play this game that trans people have to put ourselves in danger when dating to satisfy somebody's irrational and unreasonable demands.

It's not any more unreasonable than a Jew asking if the food he's ordering at a restaurant is kosher.


Then, just like in your example, its entirely up to the person in question to make their preference known. If I'm on a date (ignoring the fact that I mostly only date other trans people, and I make sure that I date cis people who are into trans people), and I hear the other person say that being trans is a dealbreaker, then I will politely excuse myself, pay whatever I owe, and leave.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:42 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Yeah, and? They'll probably bring up their infertility the moment kids are mentioned; they might also be open to adoption. You know, give one of the hundreds of thousands of kids out there a loving home.

It being against your religion isn't relevant to them because they are not necessarily of your religion. So therefore, yeah, it might be relevant to you, but it is irrelevant to the trans person.

All of your reasoning just points out further that it is your job to point out you won't date trans people, not the trans person's job to point out that they are trans.

Dealbreakers work both ways. You can't say "Whether I hate black people is irrelevant to the relationship, because you're not black"; if someone has reasons to not want to be with someone, then that's as good a reason as any other.


Try reading the sentence before that. They are not necessarily of your religion, and they may not know it is against your religion, so therefore as far as they are concerned it is irrelevant to any discussion until it is actually brought up in some fashion.

User avatar
Khalisako
Senator
 
Posts: 3938
Founded: Jul 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Khalisako » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:43 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Entirely serious. I've had sex after the first date before.

That's pretty trashy, tbh.

I wasn't gonna say it like that, but... yeah- I agree.

Inzunza wrote:
The V O I D wrote:


If you try hard enough, people are food.

Come get your PRIMCE CUTS. They're TOP NOTCH.
Highly Important Signature of Approval.
Hurdergaryp wrote:Oh, Khalisako... my dear, precious little Khalisako...
sometimes I just want to grab you by the throat and choke you for a while,
but that would not be proper behaviour. It just wouldn't do.

[DOES NOT BELIEVE IN SIN]
Trump MAGAthread Soundtrack

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:43 am

The V O I D wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:It's not any more unreasonable than a Jew asking if the food he's ordering at a restaurant is kosher.


>literally comparing people to food

what the fuck.


I thought it was by UMN's own admission that he's not really had any romantic success.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:44 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
>literally comparing people to food

what the fuck.

>the least important part of the comparison
The comparison is the breaking of religious tenets.


Which if you happen to be dating outside of your religion, the person you're dating won't know or won't necessarily care about because it is irrelevant to them and whatever religion they may or may not be apart of.

User avatar
Inzunza
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Dec 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Inzunza » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:44 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:>the least important part of the comparison
The comparison is the breaking of religious tenets.


Don't say that. Religion is boring but food is great. Everyone likes food so let's focus on the food. :D
Esta máquina mata fascistas

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:45 am

Grenartia wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
>literally comparing people to food

what the fuck.


I thought it was by UMN's own admission that he's not really had any romantic success.


Well, now I see why.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:47 am

Grenartia wrote:
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I find it funny how you play this game that there's no acceptable reason someone could have for not wanting to date a trans person.


I find it funny how you play this game that trans people have to put ourselves in danger when dating to satisfy somebody's irrational and unreasonable demands.


I don't think danger is inherently baked into revealing that a person is trans. While some people would react with hostility, I imagine that's someone you wouldn't wish to be dating anyhow.

Secondly, I don't see how eventually building a family is "irrational and unreasonable". It's a very important part of relationship building.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16386
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:50 am

Telconi wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I find it funny how you play this game that trans people have to put ourselves in danger when dating to satisfy somebody's irrational and unreasonable demands.


I don't think danger is inherently baked into revealing that a person is trans. While some people would react with hostility, I imagine that's someone you wouldn't wish to be dating anyhow.

Secondly, I don't see how eventually building a family is "irrational and unreasonable". It's a very important part of relationship building.


>forgetting adoption and the hundreds of thousands, bordering on millions, of kids without homes or families to love them
>sweats profusely

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:51 am

The V O I D wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I thought it was by UMN's own admission that he's not really had any romantic success.


Well, now I see why.

In fairness to myself, that's less because of any interactions I've had with women, and more to do with lack of interaction.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
UCE Watchdog of the Puppets
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1256
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby UCE Watchdog of the Puppets » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:51 am

Telconi wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I find it funny how you play this game that trans people have to put ourselves in danger when dating to satisfy somebody's irrational and unreasonable demands.


I don't think danger is inherently baked into revealing that a person is trans. While some people would react with hostility, I imagine that's someone you wouldn't wish to be dating anyhow.

Secondly, I don't see how eventually building a family is "irrational and unreasonable". It's a very important part of relationship building.

To be honest, it isn't...it just looks that way from the lens of our society. Would be best to probe if someone doesn't care so much about trans people that they harbor fantasies of getting to use the trans panic defense someday prior to dating them but I'm not entirely sure Tinder helps on that field...
Family building is important after all.
E STĒLLĪS LĪBERTĀS
Slightly more authoritarian alternate of The United Colonies of Earth
The surveillance is iconic, the democracy streitbare, and the Constitution sanctified.
Current year: 2560
Current President: Daniel A. Hosten

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:51 am

The V O I D wrote:
Telconi wrote:
I don't think danger is inherently baked into revealing that a person is trans. While some people would react with hostility, I imagine that's someone you wouldn't wish to be dating anyhow.

Secondly, I don't see how eventually building a family is "irrational and unreasonable". It's a very important part of relationship building.


>forgetting adoption and the hundreds of thousands, bordering on millions, of kids without homes or families to love them
>sweats profusely

Lots of people want to have children of their own.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:51 am

The V O I D wrote:There are acceptable reasons: the trans person happens to also be a bitch/douchebag; the trans person is abusive; the trans person is a crazy stalker boyfriend/girlfriend type.

Not wanting to date a trans person for being trans makes about as much sense as not wanting to date a black person for being black. And it is just as transphobic as the latter situation is most definitely racist.

You forgot another acceptable reason and the main one for most people : "Not being gay." ;^)
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:52 am

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Khalisako wrote:Are you being serious or jesting?


Entirely serious. I've had sex after the first date before.


Prude.

Why have the date at all?

Random hookups at parties :o
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
UCE Watchdog of the Puppets
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1256
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby UCE Watchdog of the Puppets » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:52 am

The V O I D wrote:
Telconi wrote:
I don't think danger is inherently baked into revealing that a person is trans. While some people would react with hostility, I imagine that's someone you wouldn't wish to be dating anyhow.

Secondly, I don't see how eventually building a family is "irrational and unreasonable". It's a very important part of relationship building.


>forgetting adoption and the hundreds of thousands, bordering on millions, of kids without homes or families to love them
>sweats profusely

I'm pretty sure Telconi wasn't leaving them out.
United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
Well, now I see why.

In fairness to myself, that's less because of any interactions I've had with women, and more to do with lack of interaction.

Same here but this isn't about cis dudes dating, it's about trans people...
E STĒLLĪS LĪBERTĀS
Slightly more authoritarian alternate of The United Colonies of Earth
The surveillance is iconic, the democracy streitbare, and the Constitution sanctified.
Current year: 2560
Current President: Daniel A. Hosten

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:52 am

Aellex wrote:
The V O I D wrote:There are acceptable reasons: the trans person happens to also be a bitch/douchebag; the trans person is abusive; the trans person is a crazy stalker boyfriend/girlfriend type.

Not wanting to date a trans person for being trans makes about as much sense as not wanting to date a black person for being black. And it is just as transphobic as the latter situation is most definitely racist.

You forgot another acceptable reason and the main one for most people : "Not being gay." ;^)


I'm not gay.

I'd still date an MtF.

Argument does not make sense? :unsure:
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:53 am

The V O I D wrote:>forgetting adoption and the hundreds of thousands, bordering on millions, of kids without homes or families to love them
>sweats profusely

>implying peoples won't always prefer to have their own blood and flesh rather than someone else's kid
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:53 am

Telconi wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I find it funny how you play this game that trans people have to put ourselves in danger when dating to satisfy somebody's irrational and unreasonable demands.


1. I don't think danger is inherently baked into revealing that a person is trans. 2. While some people would react with hostility, I imagine that's someone you wouldn't wish to be dating anyhow.

3. Secondly, I don't see how eventually building a family is "irrational and unreasonable". It's a very important part of relationship building.


1. Are you trans?

2. Cis people say that all the time, and on paper, its true, but the simple fact is, the people who react with hostility DON'T usually advertize it beforehand, so its impossible to know who will react with hostility and who won't.

3. That has nothing to do with what I said.
Last edited by Grenartia on Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:53 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Entirely serious. I've had sex after the first date before.


Prude.

Why have the date at all?

Random hookups at parties :o


That also works, I'm not picky.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Inzunza
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 169
Founded: Dec 14, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Inzunza » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:54 am

Btw, I asked a question earlier in the thread. Not to take away from the topic at hand, but now that there are a lot more people online, maybe there will be better answers than what I've seen.

Inzunza wrote:I'm not here to belittle those who are transgender or identify with a completely different gender, but because I'm pretty ignorant (and also because I want to get my total forum post numbers up, so please be patient with me).

That being said, I don't understand the identifications of gender beyond being male or female. If you were born female but want to be male and have a sex change, good on you; I'm glad you were able to get said sex change. However, terms like "bi-gender" or "gender fluid" baffle me. What defines a trait of the opposite gender? If you have female genitalia and don't like wearing a dress but prefer wearing men's clothing, then wear men's clothing. If you want to wear a dress and have male genitalia, then wear a dress. Society shouldn't dictate what you should and should not do, but at the same time I don't think you should have a term to justify wanting to do what you please.

To me, extensive classifications are just... excessive. But then again, I'm pretty ignorant on the topic matter. *shrug*
Esta máquina mata fascistas

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:54 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
The V O I D wrote:
>forgetting adoption and the hundreds of thousands, bordering on millions, of kids without homes or families to love them
>sweats profusely

Lots of people want to have children of their own.


Surrogacy.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Omnonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1368
Founded: May 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Omnonia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:55 am

The V O I D wrote:Not wanting to date a trans person for being trans makes about as much sense as not wanting to date a black person for being black. And it is just as transphobic as the latter situation is most definitely racist.

That's still a perfectly acceptable reason. Every reason not to date someone is perfectly valid and acceptable, and must be accepted and respected. Fullstop. Anything else is selfish entitlement - nobody has a right to be dated. It's a privilege, and can be legitimately withheld for every reason.

And yes, raising a fuss over "because you're black" is nothing but selfish entitlement, too, in this context. No if, no but, end of story.
8 Values: Libertarian Socialist*

Economic Axis: Socialist 76.8%
Diplomatic Axis: Internationalist 80.3%
Civil Axis: Liberal 73.5%
Societal Axis: Very Progressive 75.6%


*since it keeps coming up - this is the category 8V sorted me into. I do not identify as Libertarian.
Self-identified: Democratic Socialist

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:55 am

Aellex wrote:
The V O I D wrote:There are acceptable reasons: the trans person happens to also be a bitch/douchebag; the trans person is abusive; the trans person is a crazy stalker boyfriend/girlfriend type.

Not wanting to date a trans person for being trans makes about as much sense as not wanting to date a black person for being black. And it is just as transphobic as the latter situation is most definitely racist.

You forgot another acceptable reason and the main one for most people : "Not being gay." ;^)


Then if you're a man, don't date FtMs, and if you're a woman, don't date MtFs.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:55 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:I'm not gay.

I'd still date an MtF.

Argument does not make sense? :unsure:

Well, sorry to break it to you but you're "bicurious" at least, then.
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

User avatar
Aellex
Senator
 
Posts: 4635
Founded: Apr 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Aellex » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:56 am

Grenartia wrote:Then if you're a man, don't date FtMs, and if you're a woman, don't date MtFs.

Tis made harder by people like VOID and Neutraligon and you advocating them to hide their condition.
Citoyen Français. Disillusioned Gaulliste. Catholique.

Tombé au champ d'honneur, add 11400 posts.

Member of the Committee
for Proletarian Morality


RIP Balk, you were too good a shitposter for this site.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Ancientania, Cerula, Floofybit, Plan Neonie, Rominalos, Siluvia, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest

Advertisement

Remove ads