NATION

PASSWORD

Transgender Discussion Thread III: Vote in our poll!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should the first subtitle of our next thread be?

Trans Men Are Not Women
23
24%
Anti-Cistamines
10
10%
Please Don't Deadnaming Eve
3
3%
Is This Destroying My Free Speech
8
8%
We Know More About This Than You
11
11%
HRT And Crumpets
26
27%
Pro-Nouns & Anti-Verbs
16
16%
 
Total votes : 97

User avatar
Thuzbekistan
Minister
 
Posts: 2185
Founded: Dec 29, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Thuzbekistan » Sun Mar 10, 2019 10:07 am

Auzkhia wrote:
Farburg wrote:
Radical feminism is and extremist ideology

No shit. Radical is extreme. Radical feminism is "extreme" as it wants more than just legal and equal integration into society, like liberal feminism. It wants to change the culture.

So called radical ideologies and movements seek to transform and replace, rather than gradual change and reform, if you want to uphold the system, you will see any extreme or radical movement as a threat, and thus say it like it's a bad thing to be a radical.

Even though, I don't think something like trans rights are a radical idea, but in the society I live in, it is.
Wiliama wrote:
Well your “gender” is small potatoes to me.

Yet here you are, a rando who somehow came to this thread and to put a dismissive comment. If I'm so insignificant, what brought you are here? Maybe there's something bigger that I am not seeing.

Radical feminism demands too much, but in general radicals get what the moderates want much faster before society says "enough is enough". Wait 20 years after that and you get what you wanted all along.
Proud Member of The Western Isles, the Best RP region on NS.
An RP I'm Proud of: Orsandian Civil War
An INTJ, -A/-T

Economic Left/Right: -5.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28955
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 10:35 am

Thuzbekistan wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:No shit. Radical is extreme. Radical feminism is "extreme" as it wants more than just legal and equal integration into society, like liberal feminism. It wants to change the culture.

So called radical ideologies and movements seek to transform and replace, rather than gradual change and reform, if you want to uphold the system, you will see any extreme or radical movement as a threat, and thus say it like it's a bad thing to be a radical.

Even though, I don't think something like trans rights are a radical idea, but in the society I live in, it is.

Yet here you are, a rando who somehow came to this thread and to put a dismissive comment. If I'm so insignificant, what brought you are here? Maybe there's something bigger that I am not seeing.

Radical feminism demands too much, but in general radicals get what the moderates want much faster before society says "enough is enough". Wait 20 years after that and you get what you wanted all along.

In the Letter from Birmingham Jail, Dr Martin Luther King Jr said that the white moderate was the biggest threat to his movement. Wait your turn, but when is a marginalized group's turn to get their equal rights and dignity? Why wait 20 years, why not 15, or 10? Or 25? When's the "right time". King believed that moderates telling people to wait is like kicking the can down the street.

Trans people have been around forever, even before the label was coined. In 1969, the start of Pride began with a police riot since their existence was criminalized, and trans women of color were at the front of the battle. Even before that, in the 1920s and 1930s, there was much research on the LGBTQ community in Germany, it got worse after 1933, since the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft was one of the first targets of the Nazi regime. It was a dire existence, and quite often, these people cannot afford to wait for a more tolerant future, it's fight or perish, one cannot sit out in the underground and hope that they can be themselves, liberation begins with standing up for yourself immediately.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Mar 10, 2019 10:35 am

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:If referring to somebody as their preferred gender makes them happier and friendlier, why should I be an asshole and deny them their request?

I might not 100% agree with the trans community, but being an abrasive douche for the sake of being one is just in poor taste.

Amen brother.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Valrifell
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31063
Founded: Aug 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Valrifell » Sun Mar 10, 2019 11:57 am

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:If referring to somebody as their preferred gender makes them happier and friendlier, why should I be an asshole and deny them their request?

I might not 100% agree with the trans community, but being an abrasive douche for the sake of being one is just in poor taste.


Yeah, if you at least make a good effort and screw up once or twice I'm sure it'll be fine for 99.9% of people. Not making any kind of effort or being openly antagonistic to those people though? Not how you win friends.

Just be a decent person, it's easier than you think.
HAVING AN ALL CAPS SIG MAKES ME FEEL SMART

User avatar
Khasinkonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6485
Founded: Feb 02, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Khasinkonia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:20 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I think one of the weirdest things for me is how I’m always ready to stop being openly trans in the face of problems
Like I wonder if this means I’m not really trans or if the deep depression I feel for not being accepted and thinking about going back in the closet is more proof than anything

I can understand the sentiment. It may not be the 1950’s anymore, and we’ve made a lot of progress, but the world at large is still a very tough place for us. We have a lot of pressure put on us to stop being who we are because the current state of affairs doesn’t lend itself to easy trans integration, which isolates us. Isolation is rough, and it’s a shame some folks nitpick and worry enough that it interferes with us living our lives.

User avatar
Western Vale Confederacy
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9211
Founded: Nov 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Vale Confederacy » Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:37 pm

Valrifell wrote:
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:If referring to somebody as their preferred gender makes them happier and friendlier, why should I be an asshole and deny them their request?

I might not 100% agree with the trans community, but being an abrasive douche for the sake of being one is just in poor taste.


Yeah, if you at least make a good effort and screw up once or twice I'm sure it'll be fine for 99.9% of people. Not making any kind of effort or being openly antagonistic to those people though? Not how you win friends.

Just be a decent person, it's easier than you think.


"Just be a decent person", words I live and die by.

Again, you can have disagreements without attacking them personally.

User avatar
Khasinkonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6485
Founded: Feb 02, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Khasinkonia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:59 pm

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Valrifell wrote:
Yeah, if you at least make a good effort and screw up once or twice I'm sure it'll be fine for 99.9% of people. Not making any kind of effort or being openly antagonistic to those people though? Not how you win friends.

Just be a decent person, it's easier than you think.


"Just be a decent person", words I live and die by.

Again, you can have disagreements without attacking them personally.

Preach brother!

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28955
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 1:36 pm

A lot of transphobic people, such as Ben Shapiro, have gone out of their way to be transphobic and deliberately misgender someone, in that case, Ben Shapiro naturally said she in reference to Laverne Cox, before incorrectly saying he, on a Joe Rogan podcast. Shapiro says that chromosomes determine your pronouns, yet he probably doesn't know what they even look like, how does he know?

It's actually quite easy to be a decent person. In many cases, people will deliberately excluded or harm people in order to be consistent with their bad ideas.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Farburg
Attaché
 
Posts: 87
Founded: Oct 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Farburg » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:10 pm

Auzkhia wrote:A lot of transphobic people, such as Ben Shapiro, have gone out of their way to be transphobic and deliberately misgender someone, in that case, Ben Shapiro naturally said she in reference to Laverne Cox, before incorrectly saying he, on a Joe Rogan podcast. Shapiro says that chromosomes determine your pronouns, yet he probably doesn't know what they even look like, how does he know?

It's actually quite easy to be a decent person. In many cases, people will deliberately excluded or harm people in order to be consistent with their bad ideas.


He still has the right to say that.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:11 pm

Farburg wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:A lot of transphobic people, such as Ben Shapiro, have gone out of their way to be transphobic and deliberately misgender someone, in that case, Ben Shapiro naturally said she in reference to Laverne Cox, before incorrectly saying he, on a Joe Rogan podcast. Shapiro says that chromosomes determine your pronouns, yet he probably doesn't know what they even look like, how does he know?

It's actually quite easy to be a decent person. In many cases, people will deliberately excluded or harm people in order to be consistent with their bad ideas.


He still has the right to say that.

Sure but we have the right to call him out so I really don't see your point here.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Farburg
Attaché
 
Posts: 87
Founded: Oct 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Farburg » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:14 pm

Andsed wrote:
Farburg wrote:
He still has the right to say that.

Sure but we have the right to call him out so I really don't see your point here.


I’m saying you can’t force everyone to play along, nor should you.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:17 pm

Farburg wrote:
Andsed wrote:Sure but we have the right to call him out so I really don't see your point here.


I’m saying you can’t force everyone to play along, nor should you.

Well were not trying to were just calling people out for saying something they know is offensive to the person they are talking to. And why should we not call people by whatever pronoun they wish to be called?
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy2
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 142
Founded: Mar 09, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy2 » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:17 pm

Farburg wrote:I’m saying you can’t force everyone to play along, nor should you.

They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164171
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:19 pm

Farburg wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:A lot of transphobic people, such as Ben Shapiro, have gone out of their way to be transphobic and deliberately misgender someone, in that case, Ben Shapiro naturally said she in reference to Laverne Cox, before incorrectly saying he, on a Joe Rogan podcast. Shapiro says that chromosomes determine your pronouns, yet he probably doesn't know what they even look like, how does he know?

It's actually quite easy to be a decent person. In many cases, people will deliberately excluded or harm people in order to be consistent with their bad ideas.


He still has the right to say that.

When you can't defend what someone is saying, only appeal to their right to say it, you've lost the argument.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28955
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:19 pm

Farburg wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:A lot of transphobic people, such as Ben Shapiro, have gone out of their way to be transphobic and deliberately misgender someone, in that case, Ben Shapiro naturally said she in reference to Laverne Cox, before incorrectly saying he, on a Joe Rogan podcast. Shapiro says that chromosomes determine your pronouns, yet he probably doesn't know what they even look like, how does he know?

It's actually quite easy to be a decent person. In many cases, people will deliberately excluded or harm people in order to be consistent with their bad ideas.


He still has the right to say that.

I suppose you might have the right to say wrong things; I have the right to say that the ground is made of entirely of macaroni and cheese and that breakfast cereal is made from toenails.

You also have the right to correct me and tell me how wrong I am, and that the facts don't care about my feelings, such as that misgendering people is factually wrong.

However, just because you can doesn't mean you should, does free speech protect me from saying something intentionally harmful? In some cases, it does not.
Last edited by Auzkhia on Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Farburg
Attaché
 
Posts: 87
Founded: Oct 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Farburg » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:20 pm

Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:
Farburg wrote:I’m saying you can’t force everyone to play along, nor should you.

They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You know what, no,
Transphobia is not comparable to racism.
We need more rhetoric criticizing all this snowflakery.

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28955
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:21 pm

Farburg wrote:
Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You know what, no,
Transphobia is not comparable to racism.
We need more rhetoric criticizing all this snowflakery.

Why should I, as a trans person, hear more transphobia? Stuff that has proved harmful to developing minds of trans youth?
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164171
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:21 pm

Farburg wrote:
Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You know what, no,
Transphobia is not comparable to racism.
We need more rhetoric criticizing all this snowflakery.

Not only is transphobia as bad as racism, there's a lot of overlap between racists and transphobes, and every other kind of bigot.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Western Vale Confederacy
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9211
Founded: Nov 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Vale Confederacy » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:22 pm

Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:
Farburg wrote:I’m saying you can’t force everyone to play along, nor should you.

They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You’d only be strengthening their often recurring points about how they are being silenced, then.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:22 pm

Farburg wrote:
Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You know what, no,
Transphobia is not comparable to racism.
We need more rhetoric criticizing all this snowflakery.

I mean I consider being an asshole to someone because they identity as a different gender is pretty fucked up and not just us being snowflakes.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Hanafuridake
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5532
Founded: Sep 09, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hanafuridake » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:22 pm

Internationalist Bastard wrote:I think one of the weirdest things for me is how I’m always ready to stop being openly trans in the face of problems
Like I wonder if this means I’m not really trans or if the deep depression I feel for not being accepted and thinking about going back in the closet is more proof than anything


Why should you feel obliged to put yourself in precarious situations out of some misguided sense of the Cause™?
Nation name in proper language: 花降岳|पुष्पद्वीप
Theravada Buddhist
李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password

User avatar
Farburg
Attaché
 
Posts: 87
Founded: Oct 23, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Farburg » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:23 pm

Auzkhia wrote:
Farburg wrote:
You know what, no,
Transphobia is not comparable to racism.
We need more rhetoric criticizing all this snowflakery.

Why should I, as a trans person, hear more transphobia? Stuff that has proved harmful to developing minds of trans youth?


Because we don’t pretend to believe the delusions of schizophrenic people,
So why should we entertain your delusions.

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28955
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Auzkhia » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:23 pm

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You’d only be strengthening their often recurring points about how they are being silenced, then.

That argument is bunk.

Reactionaries are not pro-free speech, they are pro-forced listening. There is a difference and a lot of centrists fall for their tricks and don't realize it.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook Embassy App
Trans Lesbian Non-binary Lady Greco-Roman Pagan Socialist

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:24 pm

Western Vale Confederacy wrote:
Soviet Technocracy2 wrote:They shouldn't be given airtime, anymore than racists are.


You’d only be strengthening their often recurring points about how they are being silenced, then.

Yeah it is a bit of a tight walk. I mean you don't want them to spread hateful messages but you also don't want to give them ammunition about how they are being silenced.
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164171
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:24 pm

Farburg wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:Why should I, as a trans person, hear more transphobia? Stuff that has proved harmful to developing minds of trans youth?


Because we don’t pretend to believe the delusions of schizophrenic people,
So why should we entertain your delusions.

Why should we entertain your poorly delivered shit-tier arguments?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Dakran, Ethel mermania, Haganham, Ifreann, Neonian Imperium, Port Carverton, The Black Forrest, The Two Jerseys, Unmet Player, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads