Left-Wing Discussion Thread II: Behind 700,000 Bunkers

[Bakery Hill]

They will adhere to our philosophy. It is inevitable. You're just using this as an excuse to break with us over the pineapple question. Please let's not be Trotskyists about this, it's a Popular Front after all.

ONLY as long as the Three Noble Principles (baking, shoewearing, membership debate) are acknowledged and given the utmost respect.

Consider it a deal comrade.

On a more serious note, I do find myself agreeing more and more with you on the proletarian morality thing. Speaking from experience, the state of the left on college campuses is in shambles - especially because literally no one outside of the school system wants anything to do with it, and for good reason. I do agree that the left needs a major overhaul if we're ever going to be taken seriously beyond like one tiny corner of the Internet.

It's a sad state isn't it? There are some shining lights out there though. Have you heard of Angela Nagle? I'd highly recommend her.

[War Gears]

who has a fetish for trans girls

That's UMN in a nutshell.

[Northern Davincia]

And good luck trying to gain popular public support with hardlines and citing european philosophers the majority of people cant even prounce right. Adapt or die.

EXCUSE ME DO I DETECT WHIFFS OF SOCIAL DARWINISM.

I didn't choose the Rand life, the Rand life chose me.

[Dumb Ideologies]

who has a fetish for trans girls

That's UMN in a nutshell.

Life story told in new light novel: The Bear None Wanted to Trap

[Alsheb]

ONLY as long as the Three Noble Principles (baking, shoewearing, membership debate) are acknowledged and given the utmost respect.

Consider it a deal comrade.

On a more serious note, I do find myself agreeing more and more with you on the proletarian morality thing. Speaking from experience, the state of the left on college campuses is in shambles - especially because literally no one outside of the school system wants anything to do with it, and for good reason. I do agree that the left needs a major overhaul if we're ever going to be taken seriously beyond like one tiny corner of the Internet.

It's a sad state isn't it? There are some shining lights out there though. Have you heard of Angela Nagle? I'd highly recommend her.

I can't find much about her, except for a reference on Jacobin. Who is she?

[Al Hashka]

when good and evil meet together.

[Aellex]

who has a fetish for trans girls

That's UMN in a nutshell.

And thus the debate about whether Traps are gay or not set alight the LWDT like it did the RWDT before!

(Also, just in case anyone is wondering, traps do are gays )

[Tekeristan]

Purity.

[Valgora]

That's UMN in a nutshell.

And thus the debate about whether Traps are gay or not set alight the LWDT like it did the RWDT before!

(Also, just in case anyone is wondering, traps do are gays )

Traps are only gay if they do gay things.

So there is not a universal traps are gay or they are not gay, due to the fact that it is most likely impossible that all traps will have the same sexual preference.

[United Muscovite Nations]

If you're gonna go into this philosophical discussion, at least go all in:

Suppose, for sake of argument, that traps are but a species within the genus of women, just as tall women are. This would mean that traps are women, which would make it not gay to love them. However, insofar as traps are a distinct species of women, it must be fundamentally gay to love them, for the differentia of traps is the quality of having been raised as a boy. If one were to be a lover of tall women to the exclusion of women of other heights, we would say that one is a lover of tallness. Likewise, if one were to love trap-women to the exclusion of other women, we would say that the person is a lover of the differentiating quality of traps, that quality being that they were raised as boys. Thus, this person would be straight in some ways, but gay in others; therefore, as long as there is a distinction between trap-women and other women, then loving traps is a little bit gay, then, surely, it is gay.

[Valgora]

If you're gonna go into this philosophical discussion, at least go all in:

Suppose, for sake of argument, that traps are but a species within the genus of women, just as tall women are. This would mean that traps are women, which would make it not gay to love them. However, insofar as traps are a distinct species of women, it must be fundamentally gay to love them, for the differentia of traps is the quality of having been raised as a boy. If one were to be a lover of tall women to the exclusion of women of other heights, we would say that one is a lover of tallness. Likewise, if one were to love trap-women to the exclusion of other women, we would say that the person is a lover of the differentiating quality of traps, that quality being that they were raised as boys. Thus, this person would be straight in some ways, but gay in others; therefore, as long as there is a distinction between trap-women and other women, then loving traps is a little bit gay, then, surely, it is gay.

My argument was simply about whether or not traps are gay.

If we have a discussion about whether or not traps themselves are gay, it will lead to a discussion of the sexual preferences, specifically of traps. If a trap like those who are, in fact, males, then it can be said that the trap in question is gay; however, if the trap is one who likes those who are female, then it can not be said that the trap is gay, but a trap most likely feels that they are a female so them liking females would actually be gay. Of course, if the trap doesn't feel like they are a female, then them liking a female can't really be considered gay.

Therefore, I stand by my original argument, that traps are, in fact, not 100% gay.

[Kubra]

New discussions in lwdt thread i wonder what's go-
>are traps gay?

[MERIZoC]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

[Northern Davincia]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

Yes.
Pol Pot was right all along.

[Kubra]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

only if ur term papers touch

[United Muscovite Nations]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

No, why would you ever think that?

*hides family history of academia*

[Northern Davincia]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

No, why would you ever think that?

*hides family history of academia*

*stares in Cambodian*

[MERIZoC]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

Yes.
Pol Pot was right all along.

[Kubra]

No, why would you ever think that?

*hides family history of academia*

*starves in Cambodian*

fix'd

[-Jochistan-]

Fellas..........................are academics bourgeoisie?

Yes. That doesn't mean they can't betray their class though. It's not too late for anyone able to work.

[Northern Davincia]

Relevant.

[Tekeristan]

Relevant.

You seem to enjoy this.

[Northern Davincia]

Relevant.

You seem to enjoy this.

It was a labor of love, I assure thee.

[Collatis]

Relevant.

oh boy

pretty sure WRA would just shoot everyone

[Valgora]

Relevant.

You seem to enjoy this.

I enjoy being able to edit the players with characters from TV shows.

"Daryl hunts for other tributes."
"Jon Snow receives explosives from an unknown sponsor."