NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread 18-inch Mark VI: Witty Title Forthcoming

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10010
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:19 am

Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159025
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:27 am

South Park Labourite wrote:
Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.

Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.

Are you going to engage with my argument or just ignore it?

I did engage with your argument. You argued that immigrants shouldn't be counted in immigration statistics since you're trying to bring them down, i.e. fiddle the numbers, cook the books, skew the stats to keep the public on side.

Ifreann wrote:Would someone less privileged be prevented from speaking their own language by someone else speaking a different one?

They can speak their own language. They should also speak English. It was identified for instance that Muslim women are the least likely to be able to speak English due to patriarchal opinions keeping them repressed. They don't even have the opportunity to integrate or the chance to participate in the wider community, because among other things they are denied this fundamental requisite.

So offer them the opportunity. But you can't force them to learn if they don't want to. Horses and water and all that.

And if they don't learn English to your satisfaction, then what? Throw them out of the country?

Ifreann wrote:Multiculturalism has resulted in lost of trust between different communities and reduced faith in institutions.

Yes.

I don't think your source supports your argument that multiculturalism has resulted in lost trust between different communities.
Also, look at the distrust between the Bengali community and other communities in Tower Hamlets as a result of the client politics that got Luftur Rahmen elected and subsequently removed (because wouldn't you believe it, favouring certain ethnic interests is corruption). Had these client politics, which are acceptable in Bangaladeshi politics, been challenged and not tolerated, it wouldn't had happened.

So it is your contention that the problem here is that there is are Bengali and Bangladeshi communities in Tower Hamlets? Because I would have said that the problem is political corruption.


Ifreann wrote:Where a desire what? Exists?

And why shouldn't people want to protect their own cultural norms? You're threatening them. You're trying to take their way of life away from them and replace it with your own.

All I'm saying is they should integrate, unless they want to sew

A needle pulling thread. You mean "sow".
further mistrust and racism. If we have immigrants our coming to our country they should be thankful towards us and be accepting of the values we believe they should follow. It's not too much to ask.

Fuck that. Try and lord your generosity and tolerance over people and tell them that they owe you gratitude for it and they'll call you a cunt, or whatever the relevant insult would be in their own language. You're not gonna foster trust and solidarity like that.

Ifreann wrote:Sure. You should challenge harmful ideas held by British citizens as well.

Is this insinuating I don't already do this?

No. Just making the point that harmful ideas should be challenged regardless of who is holding them. It shouldn't be something limited to immigrants.
And why promote the sort of ideas that allow FGM to be tolerated?

I don't know, you tell me. Because it seems to me that government enforced cultural heterogeneity is more likely to lead to tolerance of harmful ideas, like acceptance of female genital mutilation. After all, the government isn't going to be imposing your personal interpretation of British values. Even if it was a Labour government doing it, you don't dictate Labour policy. What happens when the Tories take charge of the culture police? Or, gods forbid, UKIP or Britain First or the EDL? What happens when some future government decides that British values means monarchism is right and proper and republicanism is unacceptable? What happens if Ostro takes charge and starts rounding up Jews for mutilating their sons along with the Muslims who mutilate their daughters?

Ifreann wrote:And the answer is to only permit in immigrants who meet with the approval of the Tories?

Of British society, which is governed by HM's government.

So yes, the Tories, who are currently HM's government. I know that UKIP getting what they wanted is bringing down their party, but I don't think that that's a wise tactic to employ to try to bring down the Tory party.

Ifreann wrote:"Dated" is an interesting way to describe values you disapprove of. Are British values not themselves centuries old?

Mainstream society becomes more and more modernised, so yes British values do become modernised, as opposed to Saudi ones which are stuck in the first millenia.

The Christian values adopted in Britain originated in the first millennium(by definition, in fact) and pre-date Islam. Jewish values are older still. If it were up to you, would Labour be telling British Jews to put aside their outdated views, get with the times, and work on the Sabbath?

Ifreann wrote:It's obviously useful for people living in an English speaking country to understand English, but if they prefer to speak some other language then let them at it, I say.

I disagree. They should be out the country, there's more to immigrating to this country then being 'good for the economy' and 'essential to services'. You should participate in civic life too.

If people want to, and can, they will, especially if they see some value in it for themselves and those they care about. But if it's an obligation, a condition of remaining in the UK, then they'll treat it like an obligation being imposed on them and do the bare minimum to avoid getting in trouble.

Ifreann wrote:Why? British people reject British values and social norms and segregate themselves, and they don't get kicked out of the country for it.

We should challenge them, but we can't get rid of them, they're citizens and they have all the entitlements associated with it.

Entitlements can be taken away. The difference between citizens and immigrants isn't written into the fabric of reality. It's written into laws, and laws can be changed, especially in Britain with your parliamentary sovereignty. It's already happening. The entitlements associated with EU citizenship are being taken away from all British citizens, unless that whatchamacallit associate citizenship thing works out.

If you think that it is acceptable to deport immigrants because they hold views that you don't think should be accepted in Britain, then tell me why citizens holding those same views shouldn't be on the boat with them, beyond the fact that they are citizens.
With immigrants it's different - we citizens are letting them into our country, we expect them to fulfill a number of obligations that we set. If they don't, we can kick them out of the country. It's like saying instead of deporting immigrants who commit crimes to their own country (assuming they're treated humanely), we should imprison them because they're equal to their own citizens... no they're not, they violated the terms of their visa arrangement.

Imprisoning them sounds perfectly sensible to me. But I have weird ideas about all people being equal, regardless of paperwork.
If they got a problem and want to be 'good for the economy' somewhere else, they can do that. Also a number of people with regressive, unculturally British values are themselves British citizens - this is about encouraging them to integrate too.

Encouraging them to integrate, on pain of nothing, whereas you would be legally requiring immigrants to integrate on pain of deportation.

Ifreann wrote:Incidentally, that turning people into soap thing is probably one of those values held by Britons that you should challenge.

I do.

Government approved British gesture of approval, citizen.

You're essentially disagreeing with years of research that has been done into this problem, which I pretty much agree with.

Again, don't think I've said anything about the Casey Report or disputed its findings.


South Park Labourite wrote:I really am trying to be as nice as I possibly can to you. Like you I am an intelligent human being. Are you going to respectfully engage in an argument?

Sure. You seem to believe it rather important that people in Britain speak English, so I am respecting that. If it's annoying you then I'll stop, of course.
Because if you're not then I don't think I'll argue this with you. You knew exactly what I meant by this too.

I have no idea what you meant by "individualises his own experience". I don't know if it's even meant to be a bad thing. Like, should I be generalising my experiences instead? Or collectivising them? Should I be individualising something else?

I don't think I'm a sufficiently metropolitan liberal to grok your jargon.
Last edited by Ifreann on Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:34 am



That's not necessarily a problem, so long as the government adapts to something like a negative income tax, or universal income. There will be other changes required as the situation develops.
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:02 am

Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.

Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.


this is either the worst most unworkable idea ever or the best idea ever and i'm not sure why. it's amazing because i legitimately can't tell whether it would work or not.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:03 am

Ifreann wrote:

I don't think your source supports your argument that multiculturalism has resulted in lost trust between different communities.

Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:04 am

ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159025
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:04 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.

Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.


this is either the worst most unworkable idea ever or the best idea ever and i'm not sure why. it's amazing because i legitimately can't tell whether it would work or not.

It'd fall at the first hurdle, because the "Look, just stop counting how many immigrants there are and tell us the numbers are falling" memo would get leaked.

User avatar
South Park Labourite
Diplomat
 
Posts: 636
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby South Park Labourite » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:06 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Ifreann wrote:

I don't think your source supports your argument that multiculturalism has resulted in lost trust between different communities.

Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.

Dirty, despicable racist. Why can't you be as tolerant as Ifreann?
Sup it's Wolfmanne, Hammer of the Human Beings of an Insulting Variety

I regret nothing. It was all worth it. That is all.

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:06 am


So long as they're made in Britain.
British jobs for British robots!
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:07 am

South Park Labourite wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.

Dirty, despicable racist. Why can't you be as tolerant as Ifreann?


i can't be arsed reading the entire conversation but i want to know if you have any personal experience with a significant number of non-integrating immigrants
Last edited by Souseiseki on Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
South Park Labourite
Diplomat
 
Posts: 636
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby South Park Labourite » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:09 am

Souseiseki wrote:
South Park Labourite wrote:Dirty, despicable racist. Why can't you be as tolerant as Ifreann?


i can't be arsed reading the entire conversation but i want to know if you have any personal experience with a significant number of non-integrating immigrants

Yes. Do you?
Sup it's Wolfmanne, Hammer of the Human Beings of an Insulting Variety

I regret nothing. It was all worth it. That is all.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159025
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:14 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Ifreann wrote:

I don't think your source supports your argument that multiculturalism has resulted in lost trust between different communities.

Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.

If people don't trust people who are different from them, is that because multiculturalism somehow made them lose the trust they had, or did they start off not trusting each other and stayed that way?


South Park Labourite wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.

Dirty, despicable racist. Why can't you be as tolerant as Ifreann?

South Park Labourite wrote:I really am trying to be as nice as I possibly can to you. Like you I am an intelligent human being. Are you going to respectfully engage in an argument? Because if you're not then I don't think I'll argue this with you.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:16 am

South Park Labourite wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
i can't be arsed reading the entire conversation but i want to know if you have any personal experience with a significant number of non-integrating immigrants

Yes. Do you?


can't say i have tbh. maybe we're just doing a better job than you?
Last edited by Souseiseki on Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159025
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:19 am

Souseiseki wrote:
South Park Labourite wrote:Yes. Do you?


can't say i have tbh. maybe we're just doing a better job than you?

Are you making them all speak Scottish and wear kilts instead of burkas?

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:23 am

We have clearification from May on what Brexit means; I know previous definition was rather tautological so she has fleshed it out this time. Brexit means Red White and Blue Brexit.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:23 am

Ifreann wrote:
South Park Labourite wrote:Your words, not mine. Like the majority of the country I don't have an objection to international students because they're universally beneficial to the country. Students are a special kind of immigrant - they aren't here long term, they contribute to keeping our university system intact, they don't bring dependents, they almost always speak English, they bring lots of money to spend etc. Only 20% of people think they should be included in immigration statistics because most see the benefits of students here - for that reason, it's a bit ridiculous to include a kind of immigrant that the public doesn't see as bad inside statistics we're actively trying to reduce.

We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.

Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.

The Tories are already planning to subtract students and tell people immigration is going down.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:26 am

Ifreann wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
can't say i have tbh. maybe we're just doing a better job than you?

Are you making them all speak Scottish and wear kilts instead of burkas?

Three factors contribute to this perception: smaller number of Muslim migrants, less fear of terrorism and the particular features of Scottish people.


I lol'd
Last edited by Alvecia on Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58257
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:28 am

Ifreann wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
can't say i have tbh. maybe we're just doing a better job than you?

Are you making them all speak Scottish and wear kilts instead of burkas?

They were all born scottish, they just didnt know it yet
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159025
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:37 am

Great Nepal wrote:We have clearification from May on what Brexit means; I know previous definition was rather tautological so she has fleshed it out this time. Brexit means Red White and Blue Brexit.

Allez les bleu brexit?


Geilinor wrote:
Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.

Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.

The Tories are already planning to subtract students and tell people immigration is going down.

Yes, that's exactly what we were talking about.


Alvecia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Are you making them all speak Scottish and wear kilts instead of burkas?

Three factors contribute to this perception: smaller number of Muslim migrants, less fear of terrorism and the particular features of Scottish people.


I lol'd

Scottish: +2 tolerance of heathens

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:44 am

you gotta bet she was up all night thinking of that one

"omg, red white and blue brexit!!! like our flag! how patriotic!"

countdown to "red and white brexit" and "red, white and green brexit" starts now
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:46 am

Frank Zipper wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I like the introduction of new food personally.


Me too. I love the Narborough Road in Leicester.


*Nods*. I used to live there. Haven't found anywhere as good for takeaways since.


Great Nepal wrote:Am I the only one curious about 'British values' bit? Do we have a ministry that sets them, or is it done by sacred meeting for eight knights of the relam as they discuss what values are worthy to be called British values. Also has the value committee recently met to change it such that putting more than four fingers in an orifice is now contrary to the Great British valuetm.


We've already established that British values don't include all values that the majority of the population hold, nor are all British values ones that the whole population holds. Specifically, I'm pretty sure that "British values", in this context, means "Wolfmanne's values".
Last edited by Salandriagado on Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:56 am


User avatar
Cherya
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 12
Founded: Nov 12, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Cherya » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:57 am

Religious intolerance, tribalistic conflict and sectarian division is not something to encourage. Anyone who has lived through a civil war will tell you the same. You don't have to look far or even to another country - just turn your eye to Ulster and the horrors the 'Troubles' brought.

And isn't it strange that under the current government it is immigrants and people on benefits in the UK that have become the subject of abuse and the target for hatred while the ruling class, bankers and other elites who have inflicted the hardship on our country are able to avoid being troubled at all.
When the fat cat tells you that your fellow man is the source of your problems - don't be a fool and swallow such nonsense. Austerity is a tool used by the ruling elite to their own ends, time and time again.

This is the formula : Economic crash caused by manipulation by elites = extreme poverty = use of a scapegoat = radicalisation and fascism = War.. End result is the lower classes are thinned out in their numbers and kept in their place at the bottom and the rich get richer and the elites position is secured for another generation or two.

And why would they change when it works so well and we allow them to so easily breed division between us and enable them to control us? Wake up!

And all mainstream Uk political parties are all just the same people who all laugh behind your back at how much they've got you fighting over which tastes better when the piss is poured from the same barrell that you swallow so readily. Labour/Tory, same thing, same schools, they all drink together and laugh at the plebs (you and I.) But even they are just tools for the mechanisms and ruling elites who control this world. The Babylon System is a vampire.

They Live, We Sleep.
Last edited by Cherya on Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheryl Cole is female perfection and is to be idolised

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:00 am

Cherya wrote: become the subject of abuse and the target for hatred while the ruling class, bankers and other elites who have inflicted the hardship on our country are able to avoid being troubled at all.


Yes I've definitely not seen abusive vitriol targeted at bankers or politicians, not once.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66768
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:01 am

Hydesland wrote:
Cherya wrote: become the subject of abuse and the target for hatred while the ruling class, bankers and other elites who have inflicted the hardship on our country are able to avoid being troubled at all.


Yes I've definitely not seen abusive vitriol targeted at bankers or politicians, not once.


When was the last time a banker was subjected to hate crime?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0cala, Aggicificicerous, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Betoni, Blargoblarg, Dakran, De Stienia, Idzequitch, Ifreann, Kenowa, Narland, Port Caverton, The Notorious Mad Jack, TheKeyToJoy, Tiptoptopia, Umeria, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads