Advertisement

by Eastfield Lodge » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:19 am

by Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:27 am
South Park Labourite wrote:Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.
Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.
Are you going to engage with my argument or just ignore it?
Ifreann wrote:Would someone less privileged be prevented from speaking their own language by someone else speaking a different one?
They can speak their own language. They should also speak English. It was identified for instance that Muslim women are the least likely to be able to speak English due to patriarchal opinions keeping them repressed. They don't even have the opportunity to integrate or the chance to participate in the wider community, because among other things they are denied this fundamental requisite.
Also, look at the distrust between the Bengali community and other communities in Tower Hamlets as a result of the client politics that got Luftur Rahmen elected and subsequently removed (because wouldn't you believe it, favouring certain ethnic interests is corruption). Had these client politics, which are acceptable in Bangaladeshi politics, been challenged and not tolerated, it wouldn't had happened.
Ifreann wrote:Where a desire what? Exists?
And why shouldn't people want to protect their own cultural norms? You're threatening them. You're trying to take their way of life away from them and replace it with your own.
All I'm saying is they should integrate, unless they want to sew
further mistrust and racism. If we have immigrants our coming to our country they should be thankful towards us and be accepting of the values we believe they should follow. It's not too much to ask.
Ifreann wrote:Sure. You should challenge harmful ideas held by British citizens as well.
Is this insinuating I don't already do this?
And why promote the sort of ideas that allow FGM to be tolerated?
Ifreann wrote:And the answer is to only permit in immigrants who meet with the approval of the Tories?
Of British society, which is governed by HM's government.
Ifreann wrote:"Dated" is an interesting way to describe values you disapprove of. Are British values not themselves centuries old?
Mainstream society becomes more and more modernised, so yes British values do become modernised, as opposed to Saudi ones which are stuck in the first millenia.
Ifreann wrote:It's obviously useful for people living in an English speaking country to understand English, but if they prefer to speak some other language then let them at it, I say.
I disagree. They should be out the country, there's more to immigrating to this country then being 'good for the economy' and 'essential to services'. You should participate in civic life too.
Ifreann wrote:Why? British people reject British values and social norms and segregate themselves, and they don't get kicked out of the country for it.
We should challenge them, but we can't get rid of them, they're citizens and they have all the entitlements associated with it.
With immigrants it's different - we citizens are letting them into our country, we expect them to fulfill a number of obligations that we set. If they don't, we can kick them out of the country. It's like saying instead of deporting immigrants who commit crimes to their own country (assuming they're treated humanely), we should imprison them because they're equal to their own citizens... no they're not, they violated the terms of their visa arrangement.
If they got a problem and want to be 'good for the economy' somewhere else, they can do that. Also a number of people with regressive, unculturally British values are themselves British citizens - this is about encouraging them to integrate too.
Ifreann wrote:Incidentally, that turning people into soap thing is probably one of those values held by Britons that you should challenge.
I do.
You're essentially disagreeing with years of research that has been done into this problem, which I pretty much agree with.
South Park Labourite wrote:I really am trying to be as nice as I possibly can to you. Like you I am an intelligent human being. Are you going to respectfully engage in an argument?
Because if you're not then I don't think I'll argue this with you. You knew exactly what I meant by this too.

by Dooom35796821595 » Tue Dec 06, 2016 9:34 am
Eastfield Lodge wrote:In other, related, news, the Daily Mail finds out that immigrants stealing jobs may not be the British worker's biggest problem.
by Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:02 am
Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.
Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.

by Napkiraly » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:03 am
by Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:04 am

by Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:04 am
Souseiseki wrote:Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.
Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.
this is either the worst most unworkable idea ever or the best idea ever and i'm not sure why. it's amazing because i legitimately can't tell whether it would work or not.

by South Park Labourite » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:06 am
Napkiraly wrote:Ifreann wrote:
I don't think your source supports your argument that multiculturalism has resulted in lost trust between different communities.
Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.

by Alvecia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:06 am
Eastfield Lodge wrote:In other, related, news, the Daily Mail finds out that immigrants stealing jobs may not be the British worker's biggest problem.
by Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:07 am
South Park Labourite wrote:Napkiraly wrote:Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.
Dirty, despicable racist. Why can't you be as tolerant as Ifreann?

by South Park Labourite » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:09 am

by Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:14 am
Napkiraly wrote:Ifreann wrote:
I don't think your source supports your argument that multiculturalism has resulted in lost trust between different communities.
Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.
South Park Labourite wrote:Napkiraly wrote:Well according to those research papers, it certainly does if there is no effort to create what is essentially colour blindness in the community. The easiest way of course to achieve this is to have members of minority groups assimilate into the majority and an assimilation process that takes the route of a melting pot also ensures that the host culture remains receptive to some amount of outside influence.
Dirty, despicable racist. Why can't you be as tolerant as Ifreann?
South Park Labourite wrote:I really am trying to be as nice as I possibly can to you. Like you I am an intelligent human being. Are you going to respectfully engage in an argument? Because if you're not then I don't think I'll argue this with you.
by Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:16 am

by Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:19 am
Souseiseki wrote:South Park Labourite wrote:Yes. Do you?
can't say i have tbh. maybe we're just doing a better job than you?

by Great Nepal » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:23 am

by Geilinor » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:23 am
Ifreann wrote:South Park Labourite wrote:Your words, not mine. Like the majority of the country I don't have an objection to international students because they're universally beneficial to the country. Students are a special kind of immigrant - they aren't here long term, they contribute to keeping our university system intact, they don't bring dependents, they almost always speak English, they bring lots of money to spend etc. Only 20% of people think they should be included in immigration statistics because most see the benefits of students here - for that reason, it's a bit ridiculous to include a kind of immigrant that the public doesn't see as bad inside statistics we're actively trying to reduce.
We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.
Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.

by Alvecia » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:26 am
Three factors contribute to this perception: smaller number of Muslim migrants, less fear of terrorism and the particular features of Scottish people.

by The Huskar Social Union » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:28 am

by Ifreann » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:37 am
Great Nepal wrote:We have clearification from May on what Brexit means; I know previous definition was rather tautological so she has fleshed it out this time. Brexit means Red White and Blue Brexit.
Geilinor wrote:Ifreann wrote:We want people to think that the number of immigrants is going down, so lets stop counting all the immigrants.
Fuck, why keep immigration statistics at all, then? Just tell people they're going down. It'd be cheaper.
The Tories are already planning to subtract students and tell people immigration is going down.
by Souseiseki » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:44 am

by Salandriagado » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:46 am
Great Nepal wrote:Am I the only one curious about 'British values' bit? Do we have a ministry that sets them, or is it done by sacred meeting for eight knights of the relam as they discuss what values are worthy to be called British values. Also has the value committee recently met to change it such that putting more than four fingers in an orifice is now contrary to the Great British valuetm.

by Cherya » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:57 am

by Hydesland » Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:00 am
Cherya wrote: become the subject of abuse and the target for hatred while the ruling class, bankers and other elites who have inflicted the hardship on our country are able to avoid being troubled at all.

by Vassenor » Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:01 am
Hydesland wrote:Cherya wrote: become the subject of abuse and the target for hatred while the ruling class, bankers and other elites who have inflicted the hardship on our country are able to avoid being troubled at all.
Yes I've definitely not seen abusive vitriol targeted at bankers or politicians, not once.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0cala, Aggicificicerous, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Betoni, Blargoblarg, Dakran, De Stienia, Idzequitch, Ifreann, Kenowa, Narland, Port Caverton, The Notorious Mad Jack, TheKeyToJoy, Tiptoptopia, Umeria, Valrifall
Advertisement