NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread 18-inch Mark VI: Witty Title Forthcoming

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11556
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:15 am

Souseiseki wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-38237216

well i can't see many negative consequences from this


"Let's make the people who are supposed to help the unemployed unemployed". Because that's going to make the system more efficient. :roll:
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
South Park Labourite
Diplomat
 
Posts: 636
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby South Park Labourite » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:16 am

Philjia wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-38237216

well i can't see many negative consequences from this


"Let's make the people who are supposed to help the unemployed unemployed". Because that's going to make the system more efficient. :roll:

It's a terrible decision, especially considering how incompetent the SNP is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -drop.html

Ostroeuropa wrote:Second gen immigrants raised in ghettos shouldn't be counted as British, because inevitably, they act nothing like it except in some fringe cases.

In what respect? I see people of black and asian descent in the more run down parts of Lewisham wearing poppies. What exactly makes them not British? And as someone from 'da suburbs', am I counted as British under your system?
Last edited by South Park Labourite on Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sup it's Wolfmanne, Hammer of the Human Beings of an Insulting Variety

I regret nothing. It was all worth it. That is all.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11556
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:18 am

South Park Labourite wrote:
Philjia wrote:
"Let's make the people who are supposed to help the unemployed unemployed". Because that's going to make the system more efficient. :roll:

It's a terrible decision, especially considering how incompetent the SNP is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -drop.html


"We'll destroy Scotland, and blame it on the SNP! :twisted:"
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:19 am

Philjia wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-38237216

well i can't see many negative consequences from this


"Let's make the people who are supposed to help the unemployed unemployed". Because that's going to make the system more efficient. :roll:


apparently no job centre staff are going to lose their jobs over this which is just as ??? as it sounds
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
South Park Labourite
Diplomat
 
Posts: 636
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby South Park Labourite » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:21 am

Philjia wrote:
South Park Labourite wrote:It's a terrible decision, especially considering how incompetent the SNP is.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... -drop.html


"We'll destroy Scotland, and blame it on the SNP! :twisted:"

Well no, both the Tories and SNP have messed up Scotland. The Lib Dems too, when you count the coalition. Labour is the only viable alternative for it.

EDIT: The SNP is also especially remarkable that in spite of being a Scottish-only party they essentially screwed up the entire UK by sinking Ed Miliband's chances of going to Number 10.
Last edited by South Park Labourite on Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sup it's Wolfmanne, Hammer of the Human Beings of an Insulting Variety

I regret nothing. It was all worth it. That is all.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58281
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:24 am

Souseiseki wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-38237216

well i can't see many negative consequences from this

*sigh*

Its a genius plan clearly.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:24 am

South Park Labourite wrote:
Philjia wrote:
"We'll destroy Scotland, and blame it on the SNP! :twisted:"

Well no, both the Tories and SNP have messed up Scotland. The Lib Dems too, when you count the coalition. Labour is the only viable alternative for it.

EDIT: The SNP is also especially remarkable that in spite of being a Scottish-only party they essentially screwed up the entire UK by sinking Ed Miliband's chances of going to Number 10.


wouldn't he have still lost if labour won every SNP seat? or is the SNP's fault for existing and scaring the english into voting tory because oh no the SN{?
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
South Park Labourite
Diplomat
 
Posts: 636
Founded: Sep 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby South Park Labourite » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:24 am

The Huskar Social Union wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-38237216

well i can't see many negative consequences from this

*sigh*

Its a genius plan clearly.

It is perfect. They're doing it whilst Nicola Sturgeon is busy plotting a second referendum.

Souseiseki wrote:
South Park Labourite wrote:Well no, both the Tories and SNP have messed up Scotland. The Lib Dems too, when you count the coalition. Labour is the only viable alternative for it.

EDIT: The SNP is also especially remarkable that in spite of being a Scottish-only party they essentially screwed up the entire UK by sinking Ed Miliband's chances of going to Number 10.


wouldn't he have still lost if labour won every SNP seat? or is the SNP's fault for existing and scaring the english into voting tory because oh no the SN{?

If you didn't have Alex Salmond screaming about how he'd have Labour by the balls, would spend a load of money we don't have (because that's going so well for Scotland with 9.7 per cent of GDP deficit) and how we'd throw Trident in a beluga whale then yes things might had been different. There were a whole host of other problems associated with the Labour campaign and Miliband, but the SNP weren't helpful.
Last edited by South Park Labourite on Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
Sup it's Wolfmanne, Hammer of the Human Beings of an Insulting Variety

I regret nothing. It was all worth it. That is all.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11556
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:40 am

South Park Labourite wrote:
Philjia wrote:
"We'll destroy Scotland, and blame it on the SNP! :twisted:"

Well no, both the Tories and SNP have messed up Scotland. The Lib Dems too, when you count the coalition. Labour is the only viable alternative for it.

EDIT: The SNP is also especially remarkable that in spite of being a Scottish-only party they essentially screwed up the entire UK by sinking Ed Miliband's chances of going to Number 10.


I was suggesting that the SNP would be an easy scapegoat for the latest round of Scotland fucking by the Tories.
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:43 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Got an example?


"Go shoot that guy."


Great Nepal wrote:Adults are expected to have sufficient mental capacity to not blindly follow rhetoric of third party and commit violence; unless the person is preaching to deliberately, and knowingly preaching to venerable group (children, mentally ill etc) they can not be held responsible for actions of third party.


What about the "gang boss" side of things: someone who sits around ordering crimes to be done, but never actually commits them personally?

Presumably they'd be guilty of conspiracy to commit or associate; if a preacher can be convicted on same grounds sure but I doubt that's possible given they dont have specific knowledge of the crime.

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:So what are these complete set of behavior which are required of someone before they are British?


Did I miss the memo about Pakistan buying 10 mile of UK? Because in that case people born there would be Pakistani too; because you know Pakistani soil. If however British people moved to China, and naturalized to be Chinese citizen they'd be Chinese; regardless of if they live in a gated community of only Brits or if they live in a Chinese only village; says so right in their citizenship papers.


It's a subtle thing, but noticeable.

That's a legalistic dodge, not a cultural one. I''m not denying they have a legal right to reside here, and are legally british. Merely that they are not culturally so, and should not be called as such for census data.

British is a concept that only makes sense as a legalistic term, so is Chinese; evidenced by your inability to provide exclusive characteristics of a British person.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:47 am

Souseiseki wrote:
Philjia wrote:
"Let's make the people who are supposed to help the unemployed unemployed". Because that's going to make the system more efficient. :roll:


apparently no job centre staff are going to lose their jobs over this which is just as ??? as it sounds

So...there'll be half as many job centres, but, what, they'll all have double the staff?

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11556
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:48 am

Ifreann wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:
apparently no job centre staff are going to lose their jobs over this which is just as ??? as it sounds

So...there'll be half as many job centres, but, what, they'll all have double the staff?


This implies that the job centre's work stations were only half full before...
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:52 am

Philjia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:So...there'll be half as many job centres, but, what, they'll all have double the staff?


This implies that the job centre's work stations were only half full before...

Or maybe everyone's hours are going to be halved.

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 2738
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:53 am

Philjia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:So...there'll be half as many job centres, but, what, they'll all have double the staff?


This implies that the job centre's work stations were only half full before...

It'll be just like what the SNP are doing to the police in Scotland.
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:34 pm

"I'm outside bro." - The Man

"K. Brt." - Me

"I'm sorry. I have no marijuanas." - The Man

"oh." - Me Then why did you come here

"But, I have pills if you want. Sorry. I didn't realize til I got here." - The Man

"oh. This is fine. This will do." - Me He's pushing me on to harder drugs. Reeeeeeeeeee. No, but pills are good. I'll have some pills.

"Also, have a discount because I promised weed." - The Man

TFW when you're emotionally conflicted about a situation.

On the one hand, reeeeeeeeeeeee, legalize drugs to prevent this.
On the other, oh. He has better customer service and ethics than most companies, as do most of the dealers i've dealt with. Legalize drugs and soon enough they'll be maxing out profits by cutting shit with heroin or whatever.

Most of my interactions with everyday people really highlight that there's no simple solutions to societies problems.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:40 pm

A conversation with your drug dealer is an interaction with everyday people?
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11556
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Philjia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:41 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote: Legalize drugs and soon enough they'll be maxing out profits by cutting shit with heroin or whatever.


Not if they've got Trading Standards going round and making sure their shit is labelled and 99.1% pure.
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:44 pm

Frank Zipper wrote:A conversation with your drug dealer is an interaction with everyday people?


Most drug dealers are ordinary people who have decided to just start dealing drugs, so yes. For the most part, in a town like mine, drug use is accepted as just the norm for a section of the age population due to high tourism, port access, entertainment industry, etc.

Most dealers start as users and notice a gap in the market, then step up on behalf of their community in order to sell the product their peers demand, often in the process, preventing a social disruption that can cause damage to the fabric of the community such as half of them shifting to one other drug and half to another, or slow rot of socialization as everyone travels out of town to find drugs.

Worse, in my lifetime, i've seen drugs in my town shift from Marijuana (Followed by a major police crackdown) to Heroin and Cocaine (Followed by police going "Oh shit. Oh shit. Maybe we shouldn't have done that.") to Bonzai, to Ectasy, to Bonzai, to cocaine vs heroin, to marijuana, to bonzai, to marijuana.

Cracking down on the moonsugarmarijuana makes khajiit people turn to skooma. worse.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:45 pm

Philjia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote: Legalize drugs and soon enough they'll be maxing out profits by cutting shit with heroin or whatever.


Not if they've got Trading Standards going round and making sure their shit is labelled and 99.1% pure.


Ideally yes, and this is what I support, but i'm not confident I trust our current system to be able to resist institutional capture by corporations who would then set the regulations to benefit themselves.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:50 pm

my interactions with every day people usually just end with me thinking about how they probably support fucking me over as hard as possible and how there is no real hope for any improvement or change in this country as they either don't care or are actively against me

i live a fun life

Philjia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote: Legalize drugs and soon enough they'll be maxing out profits by cutting shit with heroin or whatever.


Not if they've got Trading Standards going round and making sure their shit is labelled and 99.1% pure.


i'm not sure if rampant lawness is the best way to ensure fair deals or the worst fair way to ensure fair deals, which is kinda funny to me
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Frank Zipper
Senator
 
Posts: 4207
Founded: Nov 16, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Frank Zipper » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:51 pm

Wtf is bonzai?

Heroin epidemics come and go, though they usually coincide with Conservative governments.

(fucking shitty fucking BT internet piece of shit connection.... grrrrrr)
Put this in your signature if you are easily led.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:52 pm

Souseiseki wrote:my interactions with every day people usually just end with me thinking about how they probably support fucking me over as hard as possible and how there is no real hope for any improvement or change in this country as they either don't care or are actively against me

i live a fun life

Philjia wrote:
Not if they've got Trading Standards going round and making sure their shit is labelled and 99.1% pure.


i'm not sure if rampant lawness is the best way to ensure fair deals or the worst fair way to ensure fair deals, which is kinda funny to me


This second bit is how I feel about it. I'm not really sure if turning over control from drug dealers to the government regulators would actually result in better drugs or just more profits.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66787
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:54 pm

Philjia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote: Legalize drugs and soon enough they'll be maxing out profits by cutting shit with heroin or whatever.


Not if they've got Trading Standards going round and making sure their shit is labelled and 99.1% pure.


Hasn't heroin over about 20% purity killed people? Just a sign of how much crap street drugs are cut with if what was a safe dose is making people OD.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:55 pm

Yes drug dealers are regularly considered center of the community, and bond that holds it together. True saints.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19955
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Dec 07, 2016 12:56 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Philjia wrote:
Not if they've got Trading Standards going round and making sure their shit is labelled and 99.1% pure.


Hasn't heroin over about 20% purity killed people? Just a sign of how much crap street drugs are cut with if what was a safe dose is making people OD.

Straight up 100% pure Heroin only causes dependence and constipation.
It's mostly the impurities and poor injection hygiene and the like that causes the more severe responses.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Andsed, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Based Illinois, Corporate Collective Salvation, Dimetrodon Empire, Elwher, Ethel mermania, Necroghastia, New Temecula, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Supaskar, Techocracy101010, The marxist plains, The Rio Grande River Basin, Vistulange, Wickedly evil people

Advertisement

Remove ads