Arlenton wrote:Looks like Fillon is slipping, and I doubt Le Pen can beat Macron. Hope I'm wrong.
Do you want the anti-American maniac to win?
Advertisement

by NeoLiberia » Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:45 pm
Arlenton wrote:Looks like Fillon is slipping, and I doubt Le Pen can beat Macron. Hope I'm wrong.

by Othelos » Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:55 pm

by Kilobugya » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:02 am
Chessmistress wrote:Le Pen is worse on the paper but she would face more opposition, while Macron would basically rule without a real opposition and by so having full power to make things being quite similar to how actually are...just only worse in almost every imaginable field...

by Philjia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 4:05 am
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.
by Minoa » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:01 am

by Great Nepal » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:19 am
Philjia wrote:Le Pen has lost her immunity to prosecution for breaking obscene communication laws. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39141391
Schadenfreude.

by Philjia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:32 am
Dolonitia wrote:Philjia wrote:Le Pen has lost her immunity to prosecution for breaking obscene communication laws. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39141391
Schadenfreude.
So she is prosecuted because of a twitter imagery?
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

by Philjia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:34 am
JG Ballard wrote:I want to rub the human race in its own vomit, and force it to look in the mirror.

by Kilobugya » Thu Mar 02, 2017 6:43 am
Dolonitia wrote:So she is prosecuted because of a twitter imagery?

by Kilobugya » Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:50 am
Dolonitia wrote:Will twitter get fined as well?

by Socialist Nordia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:23 am

by Kilobugya » Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:28 am
Socialist Nordia wrote:French presidential candidate Macron criticizes Trump's policies
Everyone (except Le Pen) here criticizes Trump and either mock him or just bash him (and he does deserve it).
by Herskerstad » Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:30 am
Philjia wrote:Le Pen has lost her immunity to prosecution for breaking obscene communication laws. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39141391
Schadenfreude.

by Kilobugya » Thu Mar 02, 2017 9:35 am
Herskerstad wrote:I get the feeling that short of a prosecution leading to a party withdrawal of support, as would have been the case if say hypothetically Clinton had been prosecuted, that prosecution enabled through oddities like these will just whip up her support come the election. There is a notion that the justice system in France is not entirely impartisan come elections.

by Herskerstad » Thu Mar 02, 2017 10:33 am
Kilobugya wrote:Herskerstad wrote:I get the feeling that short of a prosecution leading to a party withdrawal of support, as would have been the case if say hypothetically Clinton had been prosecuted, that prosecution enabled through oddities like these will just whip up her support come the election. There is a notion that the justice system in France is not entirely impartisan come elections.
Well, there is such a notion spread only by the two candidates who are under fire because they did break the law, the same ones who tend to be more "zero tolerance" and "though justice" usually. Apart from their hard-core partisan who would vote for them whatever happens, I doubt many people believe that thesis. But I also doubt the "twitting photos of IS murders" thing will cost her votes, it's a really minor offense - the "emplois fictifs" affairs, and the "illegal campaign financing" affairs, can hurt her more, as did hurt Fillon a lot, depending how much it runs in the media, and what happen on that front during the next few weeks.

by Sanctissima » Thu Mar 02, 2017 10:38 am
Herskerstad wrote:Kilobugya wrote:
Well, there is such a notion spread only by the two candidates who are under fire because they did break the law, the same ones who tend to be more "zero tolerance" and "though justice" usually. Apart from their hard-core partisan who would vote for them whatever happens, I doubt many people believe that thesis. But I also doubt the "twitting photos of IS murders" thing will cost her votes, it's a really minor offense - the "emplois fictifs" affairs, and the "illegal campaign financing" affairs, can hurt her more, as did hurt Fillon a lot, depending how much it runs in the media, and what happen on that front during the next few weeks.
Sure, though there is almost expectations of such in French politics given the state, and from what I have come to understand nothing concrete has really been lifted against Le Pen since the raids, and short of anything coming from that, then it will probably give her every reason she needs to clutch her pearls and talk about the justice department being used for political gain, which tends to gain votes.

by Herskerstad » Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:03 am
Sanctissima wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
Sure, though there is almost expectations of such in French politics given the state, and from what I have come to understand nothing concrete has really been lifted against Le Pen since the raids, and short of anything coming from that, then it will probably give her every reason she needs to clutch her pearls and talk about the justice department being used for political gain, which tends to gain votes.
Perhaps, but she's lost a lot of support in the French police forces. Not so much because of the photos, but because of her refusal to cooperate with them. It's a bit of a trade-off, since French police are natural FN voters.

by Zakuvia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:25 am
Herskerstad wrote:Kilobugya wrote:
Well, there is such a notion spread only by the two candidates who are under fire because they did break the law, the same ones who tend to be more "zero tolerance" and "though justice" usually. Apart from their hard-core partisan who would vote for them whatever happens, I doubt many people believe that thesis. But I also doubt the "twitting photos of IS murders" thing will cost her votes, it's a really minor offense - the "emplois fictifs" affairs, and the "illegal campaign financing" affairs, can hurt her more, as did hurt Fillon a lot, depending how much it runs in the media, and what happen on that front during the next few weeks.
Sure, though there is almost expectations of such in French politics given the state, and from what I have come to understand nothing concrete has really been lifted against Le Pen since the raids, and short of anything coming from that, then it will probably give her every reason she needs to clutch her pearls and talk about the justice department being used for political gain, which tends to gain votes.
by Minoa » Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:23 pm

by Chessmistress » Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:39 pm
Herskerstad wrote:Philjia wrote:Le Pen has lost her immunity to prosecution for breaking obscene communication laws. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39141391
Schadenfreude.
I get the feeling that short of a prosecution leading to a party withdrawal of support, as would have been the case if say hypothetically Clinton had been prosecuted, that prosecution enabled through oddities like these will just whip up her support come the election. There is a notion that the justice system in France is not entirely impartisan come elections.

by Sanctissima » Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:44 pm
Chessmistress wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
I get the feeling that short of a prosecution leading to a party withdrawal of support, as would have been the case if say hypothetically Clinton had been prosecuted, that prosecution enabled through oddities like these will just whip up her support come the election. There is a notion that the justice system in France is not entirely impartisan come elections.
Same feeling here.
She's being under attack for posting images of crimes committed by IS: that's very likely to be perceived as a persecution against her.
I also think that that's more or less a good case in which political immunity make sense: posting images of crimes committed by IS as a political statement is exactly the kind of behavior that should be protected by political immunity, just because it's part of a political position.
By attacking her in such way, they're making a major error, that could give her the presidency.

by The Grande Republic 0f Arcadia » Thu Mar 02, 2017 12:48 pm
Chessmistress wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
I get the feeling that short of a prosecution leading to a party withdrawal of support, as would have been the case if say hypothetically Clinton had been prosecuted, that prosecution enabled through oddities like these will just whip up her support come the election. There is a notion that the justice system in France is not entirely impartisan come elections.
Same feeling here.
She's being under attack for posting images of crimes committed by IS: that's very likely to be perceived as a persecution against her.
I also think that that's more or less a good case in which political immunity make sense: posting images of crimes committed by IS as a political statement is exactly the kind of behavior that should be protected by political immunity, just because it's part of a political position.
By attacking her in such way, they're making a major error, that could give her the presidency.

by Chessmistress » Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:15 pm
Sanctissima wrote:
Honestly, the way the Socialist Party has handled the situation so far, I'm not convinced that political strategy is even on their agenda. If it is, they're really bad at it.
by Minoa » Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Freedomanica, Hurdergaryp, Konadd, Neo-American States, Page, Primitive Communism, Valyxias, Vassenor
Advertisement