NATION

PASSWORD

French presidential primaries

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you support in the French 2017 Presidential Elections?

Marine Le Pen
396
42%
Emmanuel Macron
290
31%
François Fillon
66
7%
Benoît Hamon
52
6%
Jean-Luc Mélenchon
105
11%
Other
35
4%
 
Total votes : 944

User avatar
The Novakian Empire
Minister
 
Posts: 2019
Founded: Jan 15, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Novakian Empire » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:40 am

Baltenstein wrote:
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Personally, since the whole Trump surprise, I severely distrust polls.


The polls for the American presidential elections weren't actually wrong. They predicted that more people would cast their vote Hillary than for Trump. Which is exactly what happened.

True.
About Me
White canadian male. Call me caleb.
Pro: Palestine,Syrian Gov,Federal Quebec,Our lord and savior Cthulu,And bear grylls.
Neutral: Meh
Con: Israeli Government,erdogan,The PQ,Trump,ISIL,and Misandrists.
| [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] |
[Normal]
Head of Government: Prime Minister Thomas Schmidt
Head of State: Emperor Erik Novakai
Population: 48 Million
Armed Forces: 1.2 Million Active, 4.8 Million Reserves
| Nothing's really happening in novakia at the moment. |
Sigs 'n shit.
"The Internet is dark and full of boners." -Daniel O' Brien
WARNING:This nation represents my RL views.

User avatar
Pasong Tirad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11943
Founded: May 31, 2007
Democratic Socialists

Postby Pasong Tirad » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:40 am

Time for a new poll, I believe?

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44083
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:42 am

The Novakian Empire wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:
The polls for the American presidential elections weren't actually wrong. They predicted that more people would cast their vote Hillary than for Trump. Which is exactly what happened.

True.

It's just that logic and America seem to not get along.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
The Shining Purple Light
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Dec 21, 2015
Libertarian Police State

Postby The Shining Purple Light » Mon Apr 24, 2017 1:44 am

New haven america wrote:
The Novakian Empire wrote:True.

It's just that logic and America seem to not get along.

I don't think they ever have gotten along.
Every week, month and year of accepting
The chronic dismissal of your body is wrong
Cause you have earned the little pieces of poetry
Inscribed across you, you're home.


They come in waves.
Kamikaze planes or
lovely flowers and sweet lullabies.
Blood boils,
slapping against my skin,
Sometimes.
My love is seasonal,
It won't stay.
Don't expect anything from me.
You will be bitterly disappointed.

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:31 am

The Wolfiad wrote:By siding with Putin?

Everyone who doesn't hate Putin automatically is his puppet. *nod nod*
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:34 am

Thermodolia wrote: Foreign issues won't matter if there is no economic policy. France needs economic reform big time, Macron is supporting economic reforms. Le Pen is not. The foreign issues will not matter if the economy goes belly up.

But the reforms he is supporting are more likely to hurt than to help the country. The Loi Travail he was instrumental in the drafting of quite clearly shows that.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Ardrentt
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5765
Founded: Jan 21, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardrentt » Mon Apr 24, 2017 3:41 am

Pasong Tirad wrote:Time for a new poll, I believe?

But I just cast my vote! D:

More seriously, going by one article analysing the situation alone, considering that "fervour wins you shit" is the current paradigm, I feel like Le Pen will likely win, even though I would prefer Macron.

User avatar
Zurkerx
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 12340
Founded: Jan 20, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Zurkerx » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:27 am

Baltenstein wrote:
Western Vale Confederacy wrote:Personally, since the whole Trump surprise, I severely distrust polls.


The polls for the American presidential elections weren't actually wrong. They predicted that more people would cast their vote Hillary than for Trump. Which is exactly what happened.


They weren't wrong in that sense, they just underestimated Trump's support.
A Golden Civic: The New Pragmatic Libertarian
My Words: Indeed, Indubitably & Malarkey
Retired Admin in NSGS and NS Parliament

Accountant, Author, History Buff, Political Junkie
“Has ambition so eclipsed principle?” ~ Mitt Romney
"Try not to become a person of success, but rather try to become a person of value." ~ Albert Einstein
"Trust, but verify." ~ Ronald Reagan

User avatar
The Wolfiad
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 495
Founded: Apr 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The Wolfiad » Mon Apr 24, 2017 4:42 am

Aelex wrote:
The Wolfiad wrote:By siding with Putin?

Everyone who doesn't hate Putin automatically is his puppet. *nod nod*

You're only deluding yourself if you ignore Le Pen's record.

User avatar
Zakuvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1989
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Zakuvia » Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:30 am

Aelex wrote:
The Wolfiad wrote:By siding with Putin?

Everyone who doesn't hate Putin automatically is his puppet. *nod nod*


Apart from trying to match George Bush's high score and murdering political opponents, what exactly is laudable about Putin apart from his bare-chested bear-riding skills?
Balance is important in diets, gymnastics, and governments most of all.
NOW CELEBRATING 10 YEARS OF NS!
-1.12, -0.46

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:03 am

Zakuvia wrote:
Aelex wrote:Everyone who doesn't hate Putin automatically is his puppet. *nod nod*


Apart from trying to match George Bush's high score and murdering political opponents, what exactly is laudable about Putin apart from his bare-chested bear-riding skills?

Destabilizing national elections in favor of insular populists less likely to stand up to Russian ambitions?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:26 am

Gauthier wrote:Destabilizing national elections in favor of insular populists less likely to stand up to Russian ambitions?

Because Russia tots has the power to do so and it's not just some red-scare era tier of bullshit to justify why your politics are getting more and more hated by the population.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78484
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:29 am

Aelex wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Destabilizing national elections in favor of insular populists less likely to stand up to Russian ambitions?

Because Russia tots has the power to do so and it's not just some red-scare era tier of bullshit to justify why your politics are getting more and more hated by the population.

Well the Russian thing isn't helped by the fact that Russian intelligence agencies did hack both major American political parties
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Zakuvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1989
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Zakuvia » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:31 am

Aelex wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Destabilizing national elections in favor of insular populists less likely to stand up to Russian ambitions?

Because Russia tots has the power to do so and it's not just some red-scare era tier of bullshit to justify why your politics are getting more and more hated by the population.


North Korea pulled the cyberterrorism equivalent of the first scene in Iron Man with the Sonygate attacks. Considering the LONG history of the Russians integrating actually meaningful hackers into their cyber warfare divisions, it's foolish to think that they wouldn't, and to ignore and not extrapolate the evidence of when they actually have domestically.
Balance is important in diets, gymnastics, and governments most of all.
NOW CELEBRATING 10 YEARS OF NS!
-1.12, -0.46

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:35 am

Zakuvia wrote:
North Korea pulled the cyberterrorism equivalent of the first scene in Iron Man with the Sonygate attacks. Considering the LONG history of the Russians integrating actually meaningful hackers into their cyber warfare divisions, it's foolish to think that they wouldn't, and to ignore and not extrapolate the evidence of when they actually have domestically.

And how exactly did they manage to use said hackers to "destabilise" our election?
Well, as you're at it, how exactly did Russia "destabilised" it at all?
I mean, Guath usually just spout shitty one-liners before fleeing so I don't expect him to elaborate on those stupid claims of his but if you actually have elements to add in support of them, please do so.
Last edited by Aelex on Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:46 am

Aelex wrote:
Zakuvia wrote:
North Korea pulled the cyberterrorism equivalent of the first scene in Iron Man with the Sonygate attacks. Considering the LONG history of the Russians integrating actually meaningful hackers into their cyber warfare divisions, it's foolish to think that they wouldn't, and to ignore and not extrapolate the evidence of when they actually have domestically.

And how exactly did they manage to use said hackers to "destabilise" our election?
Well, as you're at it, how exactly did Russia "destabilised" it at all?
I mean, Guath usually just spout shitty one-liners before fleeing so I don't expect him to elaborate on those stupid claims of his but if you actually have elements to add in support of them, please do so.

Russia engineered election hacks and meddling in Europe

You're welcome.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63226
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:48 am

Je suis avec elle.

So how many feminists voted le pen?
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Zakuvia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1989
Founded: Oct 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Zakuvia » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:49 am

Aelex wrote:
Zakuvia wrote:
North Korea pulled the cyberterrorism equivalent of the first scene in Iron Man with the Sonygate attacks. Considering the LONG history of the Russians integrating actually meaningful hackers into their cyber warfare divisions, it's foolish to think that they wouldn't, and to ignore and not extrapolate the evidence of when they actually have domestically.

And how exactly did they manage to use said hackers to "destabilise" our election?
Well, as you're at it, how exactly did Russia "destabilised" it at all?
I mean, Guath usually just spout shitty one-liners before fleeing so I don't expect him to elaborate on those stupid claims of his but if you actually have elements to add in support of them, please do so.


Though I didn't use the terms myself, if I WERE to use the concept of 'destabilizing the election', I'm not talking about manipulating polling data. Most polling stations have centralized networks that can't be hacked because they don't connect to the outside world. That's not what I'm getting at. What I'm getting at is that Russian-backed hackers DID hack into the DNC and RNC's networks (thought admittedly the way they got into the DNC was embarrassingly stupid, and a child could have done it) and leaked targeted information. They didn't need to hack numbers, they did, however, hack public opinion.

Let me be first to say that, yes, if the DNC hadn't been crooked liars, they wouldn't have had dirt to spill, but that's besides the point. Tell me for one second that the RNC didn't have equivalently dirty laundry that could have been aired out, and I'll see what your grammar looks like when you're lying. That the hackers were selective in their releasing of data shows an intent, and that was to discredit the candidate who was harsher in their public commentary on Russia than the other. Russian hackers promote a pro-Russian candidate by smearing the other who's not. It's no more complicated than that.

I feel your pain, though, loads of people hop onto Rachel Maddow or Cenk's nonsensical conspiracy theories, and it muddies the waters, but I ignore them as quickly as I ignore the people who ignore the thusfar proven evidence altogether.
Last edited by Zakuvia on Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
Balance is important in diets, gymnastics, and governments most of all.
NOW CELEBRATING 10 YEARS OF NS!
-1.12, -0.46

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:49 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:Je suis avec elle.

So how many feminists voted le pen?

And how many approve of them doing so after bitching about the Clinton campaign trying to use the Woman Card?
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:54 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:Je suis avec elle.

So how many feminists voted le pen?


None. She's against abortion, against LGBT rights, don't say a word about the pay gap or domestic violence or ... the only thing under "women rights" in her program is "Islam is evil !!111!!!" no real feminist would ever vote for her.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:58 am


Soooo, just someone saying to buzzfeed that an Islamic Cyber-Attack in 2014 was a Russian false flag and Cambadélis spouting non-sense about a "gut feeling" he had?
I expected nothing but I'm still disappointed.
Guess you really were just talking shit in the end, how so very surprising and totally unlike you. :^)
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Ardrentt
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5765
Founded: Jan 21, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Ardrentt » Mon Apr 24, 2017 7:59 am

Kilobugya wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:Je suis avec elle.

So how many feminists voted le pen?


None. She's against abortion, against LGBT rights, don't say a word about the pay gap or domestic violence or ... the only thing under "women rights" in her program is "Islam is evil !!111!!!" no real feminist would ever vote for her.

Well they might well have that as their most important issue and see it as paramount for women's rights.

So I dunno: I imagine at least a fair amount of people who identify as feminists would vote for her, though I don't suspect they'd be in droves (Like maybe 5 to 10 percent of those who self identify as feminists)

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Apr 24, 2017 8:00 am

Aelex wrote:

Soooo, just someone saying to buzzfeed that an Islamic Cyber-Attack in 2014 was a Russian false flag and Cambadélis spouting non-sense about a "gut feeling" he had?
I expected nothing but I'm still disappointed.
Guess you really were just talking shit in the end, how so very surprising and totally unlike you. :^)

Yeah, if you want to ignore the pattern of Russian cyber attacks in the other European countries listed in the article. But hey nothing exists outside of La France.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Mon Apr 24, 2017 8:01 am

Ardrentt wrote:
Kilobugya wrote:
None. She's against abortion, against LGBT rights, don't say a word about the pay gap or domestic violence or ... the only thing under "women rights" in her program is "Islam is evil !!111!!!" no real feminist would ever vote for her.

Well they might well have that as their most important issue and see it as paramount for women's rights.

So I dunno: I imagine at least a fair amount of people who identify as feminists would vote for her, though I don't suspect they'd be in droves (Like maybe 5 to 10 percent of those who self identify as feminists)

Single Issue Voters, the bane of any representative government.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Mon Apr 24, 2017 8:10 am

Gauthier wrote:Yeah, if you want to ignore the pattern of Russian cyber attacks in the other European countries listed in the article. But hey nothing exists outside of La France.

>"Russia totally hacked into France and destabilised the election, this article shows it!"
>"It says no such things, in fact most of the part about France is bollock "
>"W-well they tots did it in other countries so that mean they absolutely did it in France too!"

Yeaaaaaaaah, no. If you claim that something is happening in a country, you need to actually show proofs that it did happen. A vague "well it happened elsewhere so it must have happened there too" simply won't convince anyone who isn't as ideologically motivated as you.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Dimetrodon Empire, Epic bannana, Ethel mermania, General TN, Ifreann, Kannap, Kreushia, Mergold-Aurlia, Nanatsu no Tsuki, New Eestiball, Opiachus, Plan Neonie, Republics of the Solar Union, Thermodolia, Tungstan, Uvolla, Varsemia, Welskerland

Advertisement

Remove ads