San Lumen wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
I did not say all inner cities nor did he, but some have casualities each year that resemble world war II battles and under what circumstance is that acceptable? The democrats sure as shit has done jack all to fix it there so this may be a blessing. The electoral college has a job, and that is, regardless of the popular vote, to hand over the states won by majority to the one who won them. The only way Trump could lose is if the electoral college did not do it's job and that's simply not going to happen. And impeached by what, a majority Republican control over all layers of government, fat chance. And is that what you'd really want? Because Pence might take over from that and then you might actually have something to worry about.
As far as the predictions go 4 years down the line, who knows, but I will frankly consider you an unreliable source at best to predict them as you seem to consider every hypothetical against Trump in chronological order and I am telling you. Your expectations will in part be betrayed.
The electoral college's job is not be a rubber stamp. It was designed to prevent someone unqualified and unfit to serve from becoming President. he did not win the popular vote. The Electoral college would not be doing their job if they allowed him to become President. Democracy and the planet depends on it.
No, it was meant to insure that smaller states and rural areas didn't get ignored.







