Hillary Clinton could still win the presidency

[Gauthier]

Clinton Recount Plan Draws Sore Loser Jibe From Team Trump

Trump focused on Stein, not Clinton, in a response. “The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ‘We must accept this result and then look to the future,”’ he said in a statement.

To the utter shock and surprise of no one, Trump- who constantly bawled and brayed that the electoral system was rigged against him when everyone thought he was losing- is now hypocritically crying that everyone should respect his authoritah accept the results of the election instead of doing a thorough recount in the face of Russian assfuckery.

[The Alexanderians]

Clinton Recount Plan Draws Sore Loser Jibe From Team Trump

Trump focused on Stein, not Clinton, in a response. “The people have spoken and the election is over, and as Hillary Clinton herself said on election night, in addition to her conceding by congratulating me, ‘We must accept this result and then look to the future,”’ he said in a statement.

To the utter shock and surprise of no one, Trump- who constantly bawled and brayed that the electoral system was rigged against him when everyone thought he was losing- is now hypocritically crying that everyone should respect his authoritah accept the results of the election instead of doing a thorough recount in the face of Russian assfuckery.

You're saying Russia rigged the election?

[Ifreann]

Why is this still a discussion? The election is over. This should be a closed topic imho.

Technically the election hasn't happened yet.

[Sack Jackpot Winners]

Clinton Recount Plan Draws Sore Loser Jibe From Team Trump

To the utter shock and surprise of no one, Trump- who constantly bawled and brayed that the electoral system was rigged against him when everyone thought he was losing- is now hypocritically crying that everyone should respect his authoritah accept the results of the election instead of doing a thorough recount in the face of Russian assfuckery.

You're saying Russia rigged the election?

I'm having flashbacks to the Obama birther "issue" and "vast right wing conspiracy" comment. I wonder why...

[Gauthier]

Clinton Recount Plan Draws Sore Loser Jibe From Team Trump

To the utter shock and surprise of no one, Trump- who constantly bawled and brayed that the electoral system was rigged against him when everyone thought he was losing- is now hypocritically crying that everyone should respect his authoritah accept the results of the election instead of doing a thorough recount in the face of Russian assfuckery.

You're saying Russia rigged the election?

Or "Since Russia was fucking around in election databases why be Spongebob about it instead of making sure nothing happened?" But hey if you root for a hypocritical sore loser-slash-winner that's your prerogative.

[San Lumen]

there should be a recount in Florida and North Carolina too and in every future election only paper ballots used.

[Gauthier]

You're saying Russia rigged the election?

I'm having flashbacks to the Obama birther "issue" and "vast right wing conspiracy" comment. I wonder why...

Let's not make sure nothing happened and be naive that everything happened fairly, right Mike?

[Aelex]

Or "Since Russia was fucking around in election databases why be Spongebob about it instead of making sure nothing happened?" But hey if you root for a hypocritical sore loser-slash-winner that's your prerogative.

Never had someone complained in such a sore looser-ly fashion about someone else being a sore looser. Congratulation, at this point the hypocrisy is worthy of note and recognition.

[Ifreann]

Or "Since Russia was fucking around in election databases why be Spongebob about it instead of making sure nothing happened?" But hey if you root for a hypocritical sore loser-slash-winner that's your prerogative.

Never had someone complained in such a sore looser-ly fashion about someone else being a sore looser. Congratulation, at this point the hypocrisy is worthy of note and recognition.

Loose is the opposite of tight. Lose is the opposite of win.

[Gauthier]

Or "Since Russia was fucking around in election databases why be Spongebob about it instead of making sure nothing happened?" But hey if you root for a hypocritical sore loser-slash-winner that's your prerogative.

Never had someone complained in such a sore looser-ly fashion about someone else being a sore looser. Congratulation, at this point the hypocrisy is worthy of note and recognition.

Because assuming I'm a sore loser is easier to accept than me being satisfied with the outcome of a thorough recount either way. *nod nod*

If Trump is so certain he won and that The System Is Rigged why is he so opposed to recounts?

[Valrifell]

Never had someone complained in such a sore looser-ly fashion about someone else being a sore looser. Congratulation, at this point the hypocrisy is worthy of note and recognition.

Because assuming I'm a sore loser is easier to accept than me being satisfied with the outcome of a thorough recount either way. *nod nod*

If Trump is so certain he won and that The System Is Rigged why is he so opposed to recounts?

Something something disunity, I think.

[Gauthier]

Never had someone complained in such a sore looser-ly fashion about someone else being a sore looser. Congratulation, at this point the hypocrisy is worthy of note and recognition.

Loose is the opposite of tight. Lose is the opposite of win.

Loose is the opposite of win in Trumpspeak.

[Aelex]

Loose is the opposite of tight. Lose is the opposite of win.

How dare a non-native English speaker not have a perfect grammar? This surely is a compelling argument against the points he made!

Because assuming I'm a sore loser is easier to accept than me being satisfied with the outcome of a thorough recount either way. *nod nod*

If Trump is so certain he won and that The System Is Rigged why is he so opposed to recounts?

Well, I'm not so much assuming that you're a sore loser than reading it from your vibes, behavior and phrasing. And, don't take it bad, but honestly no one give a shit weither you're satisfied or not, mate.

Point is, he don't need to accept recounting just like Obama before didn't need to. People being triggered by the result doesn't implicate voter fraud.

[Vassenor]

So GOP supporters hate the idea of a thing that should do nothing except strengthen their position.

#thingsthatmakeyougohm

[Sack Jackpot Winners]

I'm having flashbacks to the Obama birther "issue" and "vast right wing conspiracy" comment. I wonder why...

Let's not make sure nothing happened and be naive that everything happened fairly, right Mike?

Oh, I'm ok with making sure nothing happened, but saying "IT WAS THE RUSSIANS" right off the bat is very McCarthy of you.

Who the hell is "Mike"? Is that supposed to be derogatory, like calling me "boy"?

[Gauthier]

Let's not make sure nothing happened and be naive that everything happened fairly, right Mike?

Oh, I'm ok with making sure nothing happened, but saying "IT WAS THE RUSSIANS" right off the bat is very McCarthy of you.

Who the hell is "Mike"? Is that supposed to be derogatory, like calling me "boy"?

Mike the PROGRESSIVE? Don't pretend nobody gets the Flo flag.

[Godular]

Loose is the opposite of tight. Lose is the opposite of win.

How dare a non-native English speaker not have a perfect grammar? This surely is a compelling argument against the points he made!

Because assuming I'm a sore loser is easier to accept than me being satisfied with the outcome of a thorough recount either way. *nod nod*

If Trump is so certain he won and that The System Is Rigged why is he so opposed to recounts?

Well, I'm not so much assuming that you're a sore loser than reading it from your vibes, behavior and phrasing. And, don't take it bad, but honestly no one give a shit weither you're satisfied or not, mate.

Point is, he don't need to accept recounting just like Obama before didn't need to. People being triggered by the result doesn't implicate voter fraud.

Wanting to be certain that the results are on the level does not inherently equate to 'being triggered'.

[Aelex]

So GOP supporters hate the idea of a thing that should do nothing except strengthen their position.

#thingsthatmakeyougohm

Because daring to say that there is no need for a recount without actual proofs of fraud make you a "GOP supporter" and probably a fascist too.

Also, I just love your hypocrisy mate because there is literally no doubt about the fact that, had the situation been reversed and Trumps supporters were the ones asking for a recount, you would be whining about how unnecessary it is rather than supporting it because it would "strengthen your position".

[Licana]

So GOP supporters hate the idea of a thing that should do nothing except strengthen their position.

#thingsthatmakeyougohm

So Democrat supporters love the idea of giving irrelevant candidates huge sums of money for false hope.

#gobacktotwatter

[Geilinor]

So GOP supporters hate the idea of a thing that should do nothing except strengthen their position.

#thingsthatmakeyougohm

Because daring to say that there is no need for a recount without actual proofs of fraud make you a "GOP supporter" and probably a fascist too.

Also, I just love your hypocrisy mate because there is literally no doubt about the fact that, had the situation been reversed and Trumps supporters were the ones asking for a recount, you would be whining about how unnecessary it is rather than supporting it because it would "strengthen your position".

When the result is as close as it was in Wisconsin, proof is not required for a recount. The law allows candidates to ask for one.

[Zakuvia]

How dare a non-native English speaker not have a perfect grammar? This surely is a compelling argument against the points he made!


Well, I'm not so much assuming that you're a sore loser than reading it from your vibes, behavior and phrasing. And, don't take it bad, but honestly no one give a shit weither you're satisfied or not, mate.

Point is, he don't need to accept recounting just like Obama before didn't need to. People being triggered by the result doesn't implicate voter fraud.

Wanting to be certain that the results are on the level does not inherently equate to 'being triggered'.

Plus, Obama won the popular vote in 2008 at least by ten million votes, a wide enough margin to put his win well outside of conspiratorial grasp (barring Alex 'Not Human Intelligence' Jones) Trump lost by nearly two million, so it's more than fair to ask for a do-over without sounding petulant

[Aelex]

Wanting to be certain that the results are on the level does not inherently equate to 'being triggered'.

When there is no proof of electoral fraud of any sort and the only thing that push people to ask for said recount is their squashed hopes then yes, I think that my phrasing was pretty fair.

[Sanctissima]

How dare a non-native English speaker not have a perfect grammar? This surely is a compelling argument against the points he made!


Well, I'm not so much assuming that you're a sore loser than reading it from your vibes, behavior and phrasing. And, don't take it bad, but honestly no one give a shit weither you're satisfied or not, mate.

Point is, he don't need to accept recounting just like Obama before didn't need to. People being triggered by the result doesn't implicate voter fraud.

Wanting to be certain that the results are on the level does not inherently equate to 'being triggered'.

Had Hillary won, do you honestly think the Left would be batting an eye about the election results?

This isn't wanting to make sure there was no significant voter fraud. This is just a continuation of the bipartisan hissy-fit that's been thrown by the Left ever since Trump won the election. It's the exact same thing the Right would have done had Hillary won.

You can paint this however you want, but at the end of the day it's just a glorified temper tantrum.

[Gauthier]

Because assuming I'm a sore loser is easier to accept than me being satisfied with the outcome of a thorough recount either way. *nod nod*

If Trump is so certain he won and that The System Is Rigged why is he so opposed to recounts?

Well, I'm not so much assuming that you're a sore loser than reading it from your vibes, behavior and phrasing. And, don't take it bad, but honestly no one give a shit weither you're satisfied or not, mate.

Trying to outdo Trump in bullshit artistry I see.

Or "Since Russia was fucking around in election databases why be Spongebob about it instead of making sure nothing happened?" But hey if you root for a hypocritical sore loser-slash-winner that's your prerogative.

Never had someone complained in such a sore looser-ly fashion about someone else being a sore looser. Congratulation, at this point the hypocrisy is worthy of note and recognition.

Point is, he don't need to accept recounting just like Obama before didn't need to. People being triggered by the result doesn't implicate voter fraud.

Point is, nobody filed for a formal recount when Obama won and Jill Stein just did when Trump apparently won. And making sure there isn't fraud is now apparently the same as declaring fraud happened.

[Geilinor]

Wanting to be certain that the results are on the level does not inherently equate to 'being triggered'.

Had Hillary won, do you honestly think the Left would be batting an eye about the election results?

This isn't wanting to make sure there was no significant voter fraud. This is just a continuation of the bipartisan hissy-fit that's been thrown by the Left ever since Trump won the election. It's the exact same thing the Right would have done had Hillary won.

You can paint this however you want, but at the end of the day it's just a glorified temper tantrum.

It isn't a temper tantrum when legitimate concerns have been raised, however unlikely they are to be true. When the margin is within 20,000, there is no legal need to provide concrete evidence for a recount.