Yes, all second iterations should be called "electric bugaloo" or some obvious variation.
Advertisement

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:19 am

by Thermodolia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:22 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Camicon wrote:MAGAthread 2: Electric YUUUUGE-aloo
Good, good. I like it. How about:
MAGAthread 2: Attack of the YUUGE clones
This thread was a thing?


by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:23 am
Thermodolia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Good, good. I like it. How about:
MAGAthread 2: Attack of the YUUGE clones
This thread was a thing?
I just voted yes.

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:23 am
Thermodolia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Good, good. I like it. How about:
MAGAthread 2: Attack of the YUUGE clones
This thread was a thing?
I just voted yes.

by Thermodolia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:24 am
Blakk Metal wrote:Donald Trump's inaugural speech

by Thermodolia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:25 am

by Blakk Metal » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:26 am

by Gauthier » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:26 am

by Thermodolia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:26 am

by Venerable Bede » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:33 am
New haven america wrote:So I find it interesting how the CIA has proof of Russia tampering with the election (They haven't shared the info yet, but they have it), yet Trump's supporters are still denying it...

by New haven america » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:40 am
Venerable Bede wrote:New haven america wrote:So I find it interesting how the CIA has proof of Russia tampering with the election (They haven't shared the info yet, but they have it), yet Trump's supporters are still denying it...
Because it's as partisan as the FBI flapdoodle about Clinton during the election.

by Thermodolia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:40 am
Venerable Bede wrote:New haven america wrote:So I find it interesting how the CIA has proof of Russia tampering with the election (They haven't shared the info yet, but they have it), yet Trump's supporters are still denying it...
Because it's as partisan as the FBI flapdoodle about Clinton during the election.

by Venerable Bede » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:41 am

by Venerable Bede » Sat Dec 10, 2016 12:48 am


by Vassenor » Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:26 am

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:32 am

by Maineiacs » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:01 am

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:17 am

by Vassenor » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:18 am
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Exxon Mobil head Tillerson emerges as top choice for State: Has extensive business dealings with Russia, was awarded the Order Of Friendship by their government, and has lobbied for sanctions against them to be dropped.
It's like every dumb conspiracy theory I've ever dismissed out of hand about any administration has suddenly decided to branch out into non-fiction.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:21 am
Vassenor wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Exxon Mobil head Tillerson emerges as top choice for State: Has extensive business dealings with Russia, was awarded the Order Of Friendship by their government, and has lobbied for sanctions against them to be dropped.
It's like every dumb conspiracy theory I've ever dismissed out of hand about any administration has suddenly decided to branch out into non-fiction.
So when is he actually going to get started on the swamp draining he promised?

by Miss Defied » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:35 am
Vassenor wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Exxon Mobil head Tillerson emerges as top choice for State: Has extensive business dealings with Russia, was awarded the Order Of Friendship by their government, and has lobbied for sanctions against them to be dropped.
It's like every dumb conspiracy theory I've ever dismissed out of hand about any administration has suddenly decided to branch out into non-fiction.
So when is he actually going to get started on the swamp draining he promised?

by Thermodolia » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:37 am
Miss Defied wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So when is he actually going to get started on the swamp draining he promised?
He actually has been. What draining the swamp means to many of his supporters is no political insiders. What rational people see as totally inappropriate and unqualified candidates, a Trump voter likely sees as a perfect choice to tear down the system.

by Miss Defied » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:46 am
Thermodolia wrote:Miss Defied wrote:
He actually has been. What draining the swamp means to many of his supporters is no political insiders. What rational people see as totally inappropriate and unqualified candidates, a Trump voter likely sees as a perfect choice to tear down the system.
So Mitch McConnell's wife or any of the other business executives aren't political insiders?

by Miss Defied » Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:52 am
New haven america wrote:So I find it interesting how the CIA has proof of Russia tampering with the election (They haven't shared the info yet, but they have it), yet Trump's supporters are still denying it...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Duvniask, Fartsniffage, Free Ravensburg, Lotha Demokratische-Republique, Peacetime, Port Caverton, Rary, Stellar Colonies, The Rio Grande River Basin, United kigndoms of goumef
Advertisement