NATION

PASSWORD

Should 3rd Party Voters be blamed for the Trump Victory?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:19 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Not that hard



Well nobody is going to carry a machine gun and grenade launcher for self defense lol, these items are quite literally never used in crime despite already being available.

Plus I need them for my militia duties :^)


You have a point. I've never heard of somebody using an M203 for robbing banks or committing murder. Besides. Who wants to carry that trash.


Also you can get the laucngher, if you go through all the extra checks, taxes and paperwork. But only smoke and flare grenades for the most part.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
The Forsworn Knights
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Aug 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Forsworn Knights » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:20 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
You have a point. I've never heard of somebody using an M203 for robbing banks or committing murder. Besides. Who wants to carry that trash.


hey now

don't be calling M203s trash m, dems fightin words

The Forsworn Knights wrote:Now, now WRA- you said I could. And if I have the right to carry around a freaking machine gun with a grenade launcher, you are damn right someone is going to take you up on that offer and carry it everywhere.

Also, you do know that by 'Well regulated militia' they meant the National Guard units sworn to every state governor rather than the president, right?


The well regulated militia is actually every male from the ages of 17-45(?), so sayeth United States law

These things are already available for purchase, nobody does it. All I want to change is the removal of the machine gun ban that states you can't own automatic weapons made after a certain date because reasons.

Nobody does it because simply owning one will get your ass nailed, and because those are headline making weapons that will get the full force of half a dozen agencies after you. If you make it legal to use them people WILL use them.
Primary Author of The Forum Seven Guide to Location Threads
Reploid Productions wrote:It's rude to play with yourself in public.
Farnhamia wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Well, I assume Max Barry has money. So maybe he could buy a couple reporters.

He could but they don't keep for very long. A week, ten days if you keep them in the fridge, which is never convenient.
Reploid Productions wrote:Swearing is just fucking fine on this goddamn fucking forum
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:20 pm

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:What the heck else would you expect to possibly happen if you, as WRA wants to do- make it entirely legal for someone to (if they so choose) carry weapons that are designed specifically to clear an entire room and everything behind it.


I expect people to be held accountable for their actions.

And yet you run every time the police arrive due to reports of a disturbance.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Arumbia67
Diplomat
 
Posts: 704
Founded: May 20, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arumbia67 » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:21 pm

New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Arumbia67 wrote:Nobody should blamed for Hillary's loss except herself. She went up against arguably the most flawed candidate in history and blew it.


Agreed. All she needed to do was actually adopt populist positions, make actual progressives on the left top people in her campaign (Elizabeth Warren as VP instead of that boring establishment puppet Tim Kaine) and attack Trump on his many actual issues, like his blatant tax dodging, his suggesting that they should take out the families of terrorists and that he would bring back worse than torture, even if it didn't work, but instead she went with "I'm a woman".

This is how you bungle an election.

Warren would of been a worse choice. She's a total wingbat who only appeals to people who would vote Democrat anyway. Plus she can't like about being native American to get this job :p
When people say Bernie Sanders could win the presidency- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n5E7feJHw0
"Patriotism means supporting your country all the time, and your Government when it deserves it"-Mark Twain

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:21 pm

Galloism wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:
I expect people to be held accountable for their actions.

And yet you run every time the police arrive due to reports of a disturbance.


They need the exercise. :)
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3437
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
New York Times Democracy

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:21 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
Galloism wrote:You know, the senate DOES still continue to exist.


Yes, and it would be literally the only representation a large portion of the country would get if we were to move to a total nationwide popular vote.


Well no not literally, they also still appoint Representatives. The idea that because they live in a smaller state their vote should end up mattering more in the Presidential election because of the electoral college is absurd to me.

Not as absurd as Puerto Rico not having any real say in the matter, or other US territories, but still pretty absurd.

If you do keep the electoral college, at least assign the electors proportionally, that was if Trump wins a third of California he wins a third of those 55 electors, and if Hillary wins 40 something percent in Texas she wins that percent of the electors in Texas. That way you can keep the state by state dynamic, but actually have candidates fighting for percentages in all states, and not just fighting over swing states like Pennsylvania, Florida and New Hampshire the entire election.
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

User avatar
Dahon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5892
Founded: Nov 11, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Dahon » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:21 pm

To answer the question: no. This loss was hardly the fault of the third parties.
Authoritarianism kills all. Never forget that.

-5.5/-7.44

al-Ibramiyah (inactive; under research)
Moscareinas (inactive)
Trumpisslavia (inactive)
Dahon the Alternative (inactive; under research)
Our Heavenly Dwarf (Forum 7)

User avatar
The Forsworn Knights
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Aug 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Forsworn Knights » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:21 pm

Crockerland wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Also, you do know that by 'Well regulated militia' they meant the National Guard units sworn to every state governor rather than the president, right?

Completely irrelevant.

Not really, he mentioned that the real reason he wants it to be legal to carry these things around is because he wants it for him and his militia buddies.
Primary Author of The Forum Seven Guide to Location Threads
Reploid Productions wrote:It's rude to play with yourself in public.
Farnhamia wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Well, I assume Max Barry has money. So maybe he could buy a couple reporters.

He could but they don't keep for very long. A week, ten days if you keep them in the fridge, which is never convenient.
Reploid Productions wrote:Swearing is just fucking fine on this goddamn fucking forum
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54797
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:22 pm

The Forsworn Knights wrote:Nobody does it because simply owning one will get your ass nailed, and because those are headline making weapons that will get the full force of half a dozen agencies after you. If you make it legal to use them people WILL use them.


You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Sareva
Minister
 
Posts: 3151
Founded: Sep 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Sareva » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:22 pm

Costa Fierro wrote:Clinton supporters blaming others doesn't surprise me in the least, because the majority of them are too stubborn or too arrogant to admit that they fucked up majorly. There was arrogance on the assumption that Clinton was guaranteed a victory because she was a woman and she was against Trump, who is literally a spray tanned scrotum. There was arrogance in the assumption that all the blacks, Latinos, all the progressives would come out and vote in favour of Clinton when they didn't. There was arrogance in writing off the Rust Belt states in the Midwest and telling them that their concerns about the future and their struggles didn't matter because they were white rural Americans and didn't have the same kind of struggles as urban black or Latino families. There was arrogance in the social, political and intellectual elitism that Clinton was the better candidate because she was a woman. And that elitism, the idea that you are an inherently better person because you are an American progressive, is what created that arrogance and that arrogance is what lost the election for Clinton. They chose someone who cared little about the plight of Middle America and about those working class people who want work but can't find any because there is none. How can you vote for someone who represents a segment of society that says that you can't be struggling to put food on the table because you're white? I doubt these people could walk up to an out of work coal miner in Virginia or Pennsylvania and openly tell them to shut up because others have it worse when he can't feed his family and is facing foreclosure on his home.

Progressive America has no one but themselves to blame.

^This.

This is exactly why people voted for Trump. The majority of Trump voters are these kinds of people. THIS is EXACTLY why people voted for Trump. THIS is why I have absolutely no problem with Trump supporters.
~ Let us form a mutual understanding of our opposing views on the matter and how these two separate outlooks will never meet in a civil concord of equal comprehension ~
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Sareva wrote:They're ancoms LARPing as vigilantes in the name of anti-fascism while acting like the National Socialist Party in Daesh-inspired clothing.

That's quite possibly the best description of antifa I've ever heard.

Zanera wrote:Asteroids are terrorists. They support a Anarchist Rock agenda, and will attack any large rock bodies such as planets in order to scare the rest of the solar system, and will sometimes just threaten planets by going close to them as a sign saying," Anarchism rulez."

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54797
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:22 pm

The Forsworn Knights wrote:
Crockerland wrote:Completely irrelevant.

Not really, he mentioned that the real reason he wants it to be legal to carry these things around is because he wants it for him and his militia buddies.


Sarcasm btw
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Free Missouri
Minister
 
Posts: 2634
Founded: Dec 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Free Missouri » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:22 pm

Galloism wrote:
IFailedAtLife wrote:how?

I define largeness by people, as the government is meant to represent the people, not the dirt.

ALL the people not just the majority, or plurality. we call that tyranny.


I personally would like my own system to be put into the EC. Since each EC vote in the states is supposed to represent one of the seats the state has in congress (Missouri has 10 Electoral Votes, 8 for the 8 districts and 2 for the two senators), my suggestion is simply that we split the states in electoral districts mirroring their congressional districts so that those people vote once for their district's elector and twice for statewide electors. everyone's somewhat happy.
Military Whitelist
[spoiler=Isidewith score]http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/933358212
Merry Christmas, Frohe Weihnachten, Zalig Kerstfeest, শুভ বড়দিন, Feliz Navidad, and to all a blessed new year.

“Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists.”The Uses of Diversity, 1921, GK Chesterton

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:24 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Nobody does it because simply owning one will get your ass nailed, and because those are headline making weapons that will get the full force of half a dozen agencies after you. If you make it legal to use them people WILL use them.


You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?

Hurting feelings?
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:24 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Nobody does it because simply owning one will get your ass nailed, and because those are headline making weapons that will get the full force of half a dozen agencies after you. If you make it legal to use them people WILL use them.


You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?


I wish I could buy an m224. Sadly it's impossible.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
The Forsworn Knights
Minister
 
Posts: 3138
Founded: Aug 28, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Forsworn Knights » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:24 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Nobody does it because simply owning one will get your ass nailed, and because those are headline making weapons that will get the full force of half a dozen agencies after you. If you make it legal to use them people WILL use them.


You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?

Well, for starters you dont need to actually break the law to get put on the no-fly list, several watchlists, etc. And if you ever used a M60 in public the Spray would get you in massive trouble due to property damage and the inevitability of the spray of a Squad Automatic Weapon hitting a ton of innocents.
Primary Author of The Forum Seven Guide to Location Threads
Reploid Productions wrote:It's rude to play with yourself in public.
Farnhamia wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Well, I assume Max Barry has money. So maybe he could buy a couple reporters.

He could but they don't keep for very long. A week, ten days if you keep them in the fridge, which is never convenient.
Reploid Productions wrote:Swearing is just fucking fine on this goddamn fucking forum
[violet] wrote:Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:25 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Nobody does it because simply owning one will get your ass nailed, and because those are headline making weapons that will get the full force of half a dozen agencies after you. If you make it legal to use them people WILL use them.


You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?


In theory you can, but you will be on lists, in fact the is a requirement of getting those weapons, you are subject to periodic checks.
And most people cannot get them. Unless you are one of the few with an FFL.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:25 pm

The Forsworn Knights wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?

Well, for starters you dont need to actually break the law to get put on the no-fly list, several watchlists, etc. And if you ever used a M60 in public the Spray would get you in massive trouble due to property damage and the inevitability of the spray of a Squad Automatic Weapon hitting a ton of innocents.


Uh why would you spray with an m60 a ton of innocents?
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:25 pm

The Forsworn Knights wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Not that hard



Well nobody is going to carry a machine gun and grenade launcher for self defense lol, these items are quite literally never used in crime despite already being available.

Plus I need them for my militia duties :^)

Also, you do know that by 'Well regulated militia' they meant the National Guard units sworn to every state governor rather than the president, right?

No, they didn't. The Militia is everybody. Every Able-bodied man from 17-45; later expanded to include everyone. We are all the Militia. And 'well regulated' meant trained. The intent listed in the Second Amendment is that it was vital that as many people as possible be skilled in the use and maintenance of firearms should they ever have to be organized into a militia.
Last edited by Lunatic Goofballs on Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73175
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Free Missouri wrote:
Galloism wrote:I define largeness by people, as the government is meant to represent the people, not the dirt.

ALL the people not just the majority, or plurality. we call that tyranny.


I personally would like my own system to be put into the EC. Since each EC vote in the states is supposed to represent one of the seats the state has in congress (Missouri has 10 Electoral Votes, 8 for the 8 districts and 2 for the two senators), my suggestion is simply that we split the states in electoral districts mirroring their congressional districts so that those people vote once for their district's elector and twice for statewide electors. everyone's somewhat happy.

That increases the power of gerrymandering, not reducing it.

I'd accept as a compromise that electors be awarded proportionally in every state. Still has the problem the EC has of encouraging voter suppression, but it would be better.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
New Socialist South Africa
Minister
 
Posts: 3437
Founded: Aug 31, 2013
New York Times Democracy

Postby New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Arumbia67 wrote:
New Socialist South Africa wrote:
Agreed. All she needed to do was actually adopt populist positions, make actual progressives on the left top people in her campaign (Elizabeth Warren as VP instead of that boring establishment puppet Tim Kaine) and attack Trump on his many actual issues, like his blatant tax dodging, his suggesting that they should take out the families of terrorists and that he would bring back worse than torture, even if it didn't work, but instead she went with "I'm a woman".

This is how you bungle an election.

Warren would of been a worse choice. She's a total wingbat who only appeals to people who would vote Democrat anyway. Plus she can't like about being native American to get this job :p


Even Fox News contributors were saying she would be a good VP. She actually inspires young progressives to go out and vote, rather than seeing them stay home or vote Third party. She would scare Republicans, but they won't vote Hillary anyway. I'm trying to work out if Tim Kaine won over anyone, or if anyone even knew who he was, or whether he had just put them to sleep.

It is about holding you base and winning undecided voters, Warren certainly holds the base, and she is charismatic enough to win quite a number of undecideds even if you don't like her. Tim Kaine had the base leaving because he was a boring establishment pick, and he didn't win over independents because he was a boring guy with little name recognition and even less charisma. I have socks with more charisma than Tim Kaine.

You need to get people excited to go vote, Trump did that, Kaine and Hillary didn't. Warren would have.
Last edited by New Socialist South Africa on Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I find that offensive" is never a sound counter argument.
"Men in general are quick to believe that which they wish to be true." - Gaius Julius Caesar
"I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it's for or against." - Malcolm X
"The soul of a nation can be seen in the way it treats its children" - Nelson Mandela
The wealth of humanity should be determined by that of the poorest individual.

"What makes a man

Strength enough to build a home
Time enough to hold a child
and Love enough to break a heart".

Terry Pratchett


Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54797
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:27 pm

Uxupox wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?


I wish I could buy an m224. Sadly it's impossible.


Mortar? It might not be an M224 but if you're serious I can point you in the right direction for a mortar of some sort.

The Forsworn Knights wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
You can already own both a grenade launcher and an M60 tho, what would you get nailed for?

Well, for starters you dont need to actually break the law to get put on the no-fly list, several watchlists, etc. And if you ever used a M60 in public the Spray would get you in massive trouble due to property damage and the inevitability of the spray of a Squad Automatic Weapon hitting a ton of innocents.


Good thing nobody is going to carry a pig in public lol

I just want to remove the ban on new MG's. Surely you can agree it's nonsense that I, a law abiding gun nut, can own a machine gun made on May 19th of 1986 but I can't own one made on May 20th of the same year.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Mandicoria II
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 179
Founded: Jun 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Mandicoria II » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:27 pm

Dooom35796821595 wrote:Blamed? Trump won, that's all there is to it. You can blame the electoral collage, but it won't change who will become POTUS in January.
old account from when i was edgy

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:28 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:I just want to remove the ban on new MG's. Surely you can agree it's nonsense that I, a law abiding gun nut, can own a machine gun made on May 19th of 1986 but I can't own one made on May 20th of the same year.

Handheld MGs are trash anyways lmao.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Uxupox
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13447
Founded: Nov 13, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Uxupox » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:29 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Uxupox wrote:
I wish I could buy an m224. Sadly it's impossible.


Mortar? It might not be an M224 but if you're serious I can point you in the right direction for a mortar of some sort.



TG me.
Economic Left/Right: 0.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.00

User avatar
Luziyca
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38290
Founded: Nov 13, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Luziyca » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:29 pm

When I brought up the possibility on the IRC, my regionmate was angry because he received IRL threats from endorsing Gary Johnson and voting for him, to the point he needed to be protected by campus security.

However, with the fact that Clinton won the popular vote but still lost because of the Electoral College, I think it's easier to blame the Electoral College. Not that I've really supported it at all.
|||The Kingdom of Rwizikuru|||
Your feeble attempts to change the very nature of how time itself has been organized by mankind shall fall on barren ground and bear no fruit
WikiFacebookKylaris: the best region for eight years runningAbout meYouTubePolitical compass

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Elwher, Fort Viorlia, Ifreann, Lagene, Neo-Hermitius, Plan Neonie, San Lumen, Shudana, Simonia, Statesburg, Stratonesia, The Matthew Islands, The Vooperian Union, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads