Advertisement
by Diopolis » Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:59 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:59 pm
by Novus America » Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:59 pm
United States of Natan wrote:Elwher wrote:
And they have a right to take whatever measures they feel necessary to protect that safety and security. Gun control is taking away the existing right of gun owners, exactly what the original post accused Trump of wanting to do.
Oh, and that means that you should be allowed to own a military grade weapon?
by Crockerland » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:00 pm
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Isle of Shadows wrote:I've already addressed this similar question in a previous post.
Once again.
>Woman whose husband was a manwhore who certainly went too far in his manwhorishness, but who was prolly not a rapist
VS
>Guy who personally sexually assaulted individuals, then brushed the confession off as 'Locker Room banter' (Which as a guy who has been in a lot of locker rooms, is bull.), all the while saying that 35 years old is 'checkout' for wives, said that he would in fact refer to his daughter as a 'piece of ass'.
United States of Natan wrote:Regardless, all the ideals that liberals champion will go down the drain under trump, and his congress and court.
United States of Natan wrote:So Liberals and progressives who voted against Hillary because they falsely equated her with donald trump have themselves to blame for this.
United States of Natan wrote:Look, I'm not saying you shouldn't support a third party candidate if you want. Of course you can.
United States of Natan wrote:But what I am saying is that there is a time and a place,
United States of Natan wrote:and when we run the risk of progress being halted, that isn't the time or the place.
United States of Natan wrote:Yes, you may not like Hillary.
United States of Natan wrote:But stop equating her to Donald Trump. She's nowhere near as bad as him. She would've protected most of the values that liberals and progressives hold dear,
United States of Natan wrote:particularly with her supreme court pick.
United States of Natan wrote:Again, this isn't only about the candidate. this is about progress and liberalism.
United States of Natan wrote:And now those are all about to be stopped and reversed for 4 years because a few liberals couldn't see the bigger picture.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:01 pm
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:02 pm
Socialist Nordia wrote:The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:Happened to Gore and it happened now, and it will probably happen in the future. The system is broken but no one is going to fix it, that's the way it's going to be.
"Sorry dems, your votes don't matter and now we're locked into the presidency because the electoral college skews our way and we're also locked into congress because we gerrymandered the hell out of everything and your vote doesn't really matter anymore, but just deal with it, too bad for you."
by Galloism » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:02 pm
The Emerald Legion wrote:Socialist Nordia wrote:"Sorry dems, your votes don't matter and now we're locked into the presidency because the electoral college skews our way and we're also locked into congress because we gerrymandered the hell out of everything and your vote doesn't really matter anymore, but just deal with it, too bad for you."
Would it be any better to tell 90% of the country to bend over backwards for, and take whatever a handful of cities wants?
by Novoslavya » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:02 pm
United States of Natan wrote:Novoslavya wrote:
Then again:
>sometimes odd billionaire who sometimes goes too far in his hunt for votes
VS
>woman who gets massive funds from countries where human rights are an abstract noun, who was involved in the US policy to destroy functioning countries, who proposed rigging the elections held in the area of Palestine, who, as it seems, defended a child-rapist whom she knew was guilty, who is monopolized the media in her favour during the election (from demonizing Trump to giving her debate questions before debates and publishing things only she approved of)
The most horrible thing about Clinton supporters is that they either don't want to know this or they know and don't care.
You seem to be disregarding all of the women who are accusing trump of sexual assault, oh and the trump university scam. Oh, and his foundation, which illegally donated money to AG of Florida Pam Bondi (who, by the way, appears to be a florida elector now), and paid for a portrait of trump. A foundation he barely donates too, by the way. Oh, and all his tax fraud. Oh, and let's not forget how he allegedly raped a 13 year old girl.
by The Forsworn Knights » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:03 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:05 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:06 pm
by New Socialist South Africa » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:06 pm
Galloism wrote:Liriena wrote:No. And this election should not discourage people from voting outside the two-party system. A more diverse political spectrum is way overdue in American politics.
If we want a more diverse political spectrum, we need structural change to our voting system.
The mathematical backing of our system results in nothing else but a two party system.
Olthar wrote:Anyone who buys "x-ray specs" expecting them to be real deserves to lose their money.
by Free Missouri » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:06 pm
by Trotza » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:06 pm
by The Forsworn Knights » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:07 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:The Forsworn Knights wrote:Muskets couldnt clear an entire crowd though. A military grade firearm can. That is before you get into bombs.
Bombs and other such devices are legal, albeit with some paperwork.
The only military grade weapons you can't own at the federal level are machine guns made after May 19th, 1986 and there's suddenly a lot of momentum to change this.
by Arumbia67 » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:07 pm
by Vassenor » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:07 pm
by Liriena » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:07 pm
Galloism wrote:Liriena wrote:No. And this election should not discourage people from voting outside the two-party system. A more diverse political spectrum is way overdue in American politics.
If we want a more diverse political spectrum, we need structural change to our voting system.
The mathematical backing of our system results in nothing else but a two party system.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:08 pm
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bombs and other such devices are legal, albeit with some paperwork.
The only military grade weapons you can't own at the federal level are machine guns made after May 19th, 1986 and there's suddenly a lot of momentum to change this.
So, what you are saying is that if I do the right paperwork I should be able to get a M60 with a mounted grenade Launcher so that I can carry it around in case some guy decides to rob the book store I happen to be in with my big honkin gun?
by The Forsworn Knights » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:08 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:08 pm
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bombs and other such devices are legal, albeit with some paperwork.
The only military grade weapons you can't own at the federal level are machine guns made after May 19th, 1986 and there's suddenly a lot of momentum to change this.
So, what you are saying is...
by The Emerald Legion » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:09 pm
by Uxupox » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:09 pm
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Bombs and other such devices are legal, albeit with some paperwork.
The only military grade weapons you can't own at the federal level are machine guns made after May 19th, 1986 and there's suddenly a lot of momentum to change this.
So, what you are saying is that if I do the right paperwork I should be able to get a M60 with a mounted grenade Launcher so that I can carry it around in case some guy decides to rob the book store I happen to be in with my big honkin gun?
by Sareva » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:09 pm
Zanera wrote:Asteroids are terrorists. They support a Anarchist Rock agenda, and will attack any large rock bodies such as planets in order to scare the rest of the solar system, and will sometimes just threaten planets by going close to them as a sign saying," Anarchism rulez."
by Cream Sauce » Thu Nov 10, 2016 5:09 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Castille de Italia, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Kubra, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement