NATION

PASSWORD

Should the US switch to popular vote vs. electoral college?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the U.S. switch to the popular vote and abandon the electoral college?

Yes
388
40%
No
413
42%
I don't care, I'm Canadian.
35
4%
The U.S. is too much of a burden on the world, make America British again.
144
15%
 
Total votes : 980

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:42 am

The New Union of American States wrote:
Alvecia wrote:"SJW is the answer, what is the question?"

Who invented the strawmen that SJW's don't use?
Go to a college campus and try to talk about free speech in a meaningful way. I'm all for equal rights. But there are people on the left who want the government to control language and that, my friend, is just plain stupid.

There are people on the right who want the same thing, I don't see your point.
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
The New Union of American States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Nov 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Union of American States » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:50 am

Alvecia wrote:
The New Union of American States wrote:Go to a college campus and try to talk about free speech in a meaningful way. I'm all for equal rights. But there are people on the left who want the government to control language and that, my friend, is just plain stupid.

There are people on the right who want the same thing, I don't see your point.


Then pay attention to the news.

User avatar
Nazis in Space
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11714
Founded: Aug 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazis in Space » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:51 am

Personally, I'm with Alexander The Great (blessed by his infalliability, greatest of the Founding Fathers).

The strongest shall rule.

The Presidency should be decided at Wrestlemania.

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:52 am

The New Union of American States wrote:
Alvecia wrote:There are people on the right who want the same thing, I don't see your point.


Then pay attention to the news.

That's got nothing to do with the point.
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
The New Union of American States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Nov 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Union of American States » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:53 am

Alvecia wrote:
The New Union of American States wrote:
Then pay attention to the news.

That's got nothing to do with the point.


I'm done with you.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:53 am

The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
The New Union of American States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Nov 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Union of American States » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:54 am

Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.


Amen.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:57 am

Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.


Or, you know, you have the faintest trace of respect for the concept of all votes being equal.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:59 am

The New Union of American States wrote:
Alvecia wrote:That's got nothing to do with the point.


I'm done with you.

Way to shut down discussion
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
The New Union of American States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Nov 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Union of American States » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:00 am

Alvecia wrote:
The New Union of American States wrote:
I'm done with you.

Way to shut down discussion


You can keep talking. I just prefer to argue with people who know how to argue. By all means, be my guest. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:02 am

The New Union of American States wrote:
Alvecia wrote:Way to shut down discussion


You can keep talking. I just prefer to argue with people who know how to argue. By all means, be my guest. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Rich, coming from someone who's "argument" was "watch the news".
Last edited by Alvecia on Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
The New Union of American States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Nov 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Union of American States » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:04 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.


Or, you know, you have the faintest trace of respect for the concept of all votes being equal.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10 ... e-hillary/
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/g ... ats-229856
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/10/2 ... le-voting/
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch ... er-america
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/ ... a-n2168330

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:05 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.


Or, you know, you have the faintest trace of respect for the concept of all votes being equal.


So you think NE and the west coast are more important than the rest of the nation. Gotcha.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:05 am



Which of those has any relevance whatsoever to my post?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Nazis in Space
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11714
Founded: Aug 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Nazis in Space » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:07 am

Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.

Indeed. This could only possible work if we added some sort of counter-balancing factor. Let's say, a second chamber to the parliament, which gets exactly two seats per state, thus giving the large, but thinly populated states the means to counterbalance the population-heavy states.

I propose that we call this hypothetical second chamber a 'Senate' in a callback to the Roman Republic of old.
Last edited by Nazis in Space on Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:08 am

Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.

Or if you''d prefer if Californian citizens weren't worth a third of Wyoming citizens electorally speaking. ;)
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19942
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:10 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Or, you know, you have the faintest trace of respect for the concept of all votes being equal.


So you think NE and the west coast are more important than the rest of the nation. Gotcha.

Arguably is a single person is worth a single vote, then the areas with more people are worth more votes.
Preventing the rural areas from being completely ignored is important yes, but I don't think making them the sole focus to the detriment of urban areas is the solution.
British
Atheist
IT Support
That there is no exception to the rule "There is an exception to every rule" is the exception that proves the rule.
---
Give a man a fish, and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll stop asking you to catch his fish.
That's not happening
That shouldn't be happening
Why is that happening?
That's why it's happening?
How has this ever worked?

User avatar
The New Union of American States
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 24
Founded: Nov 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Union of American States » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:13 am



You can't always trust the popular vote because some parties like to cheat. The EC allows for close races to be decided in a much more decisive manner and ensures that the citizens of each State are represented appropriately in this REPUBLIC. Even Bernie Sanders thinks we should keep the EC.
Last edited by The New Union of American States on Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:14 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Or, you know, you have the faintest trace of respect for the concept of all votes being equal.


So you think NE and the west coast are more important than the rest of the nation. Gotcha.


Yes, I think that larger groups should have more say in elections than smaller groups. Welcome to democracy.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:15 am

The New Union of American States wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Which of those has any relevance whatsoever to my post?


You can't always trust the popular vote because some parties like to cheat. The EC allows for close races to be decided in a much more decisive manner and ensures that the citizens of each State are represented appropriately in this REPUBLIC.


Voter fraud is negligible. How, exactly, is having some people's vote be worth more than others in any way fair? What exactly is the relevance of the word "republic"?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21493
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:16 am

Great Nepal wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:The only reason to drop the EC is if you want the nation dominated by the west coast and New England. Unreasonable at best.

Or if you''d prefer if Californian citizens weren't worth a third of Wyoming citizens electorally speaking. ;)


Not that anyone actually seriously interested in winning an election would sacrifice huge swathes of the American populace in the arrogant belief they could win every single vote they need by getting massive turnouts and massive support from a select few areas of the country...
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:17 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
So you think NE and the west coast are more important than the rest of the nation. Gotcha.


Yes, I think that larger groups should have more say in elections than smaller groups. Welcome to democracy.


Democracy is inherently flawed. Welcome to the Republic.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:18 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Yes, I think that larger groups should have more say in elections than smaller groups. Welcome to democracy.


Democracy is inherently flawed. Welcome to the Republic.


What, exactly, do you think "republic" means? Because it sure as fuck doesn't have anything to do with electoral systems.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:18 am

Salandriagado wrote:
The New Union of American States wrote:
You can't always trust the popular vote because some parties like to cheat. The EC allows for close races to be decided in a much more decisive manner and ensures that the citizens of each State are represented appropriately in this REPUBLIC.


Voter fraud is negligible. How, exactly, is having some people's vote be worth more than others in any way fair? What exactly is the relevance of the word "republic"?


California allows illegal aliens to vote. The very definition of voter fraud. As long as that is the case, NONE of the votes from Cali should count.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:19 am

Big Jim P wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Voter fraud is negligible. How, exactly, is having some people's vote be worth more than others in any way fair? What exactly is the relevance of the word "republic"?


California allows illegal aliens to vote. The very definition of voter fraud. As long as that is the case, NONE of the votes from Cali should count.


Yeah, no part of that is true. I notice that you also completely ignored the point.
Last edited by Salandriagado on Wed Nov 16, 2016 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Armsmania, Bemolian Lands, Beyaz Toros, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Concejos Unidos, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Hispida, Ifreann, Union of Nobelia, United Mercantile State of Lichtenstein

Advertisement

Remove ads