Advertisement

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:48 pm


by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:49 pm


by Germanic Templars » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:52 pm

by Sanctissima » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:53 pm

by The Liberated Territories » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:53 pm

by Pandeeria » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:54 pm
The Liberated Territories wrote:The Enlightenment was the single greatest thing to happen to this earth. Before that we were living in thatch houses, lynching our neighbors for being damn witches.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:54 pm

by Even Less of Mackonia » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:54 pm

by Germanic Templars » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:56 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:57 pm

by Pandeeria » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:57 pm
Even Less of Mackonia wrote:The Enlightenment was one of the stupidest movements in human history founded entirely on the propagation of superstition and ignorance. Anyone who associates it with 'rationalism' or 'science' and thinks it remotely atheistic is not to be trusted.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by The Liberated Territories » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:58 pm
Pandeeria wrote:The Liberated Territories wrote:The Enlightenment was the single greatest thing to happen to this earth. Before that we were living in thatch houses, lynching our neighbors for being damn witches.
Well yeah, the next stage of general development in society is bound to be better than the last.

by Dushan » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:58 pm
Germanic Templars wrote:-Fahrong- wrote:Blegh, proto-nationalism at best. The Enlightenment is certainly the cradle of true modern nationalism.
Indeed, thats a good thing, it is the reactionary spirit.
Reactionary sounds too... Knee jerky. Conservative sounds better because conserving moral values and tradition is key element of the right, imo.

by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:59 pm
Pandeeria wrote:The Enlightenment drastically sped up scientific progress so you can live the life you have today, rather than being a fucking always-hungry peasant in some fiefdom.

by Pandeeria » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:01 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:01 pm

by Even Less of Mackonia » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:01 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Even Less of Mackonia wrote:The Enlightenment was one of the stupidest movements in human history founded entirely on the propagation of superstition and ignorance. Anyone who associates it with 'rationalism' or 'science' and thinks it remotely atheistic is not to be trusted.
The Enlightenment drastically sped up scientific progress so you can live the life you have today, rather than being a fucking always-hungry peasant in some fiefdom.

by Sanctissima » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:02 pm

by Pandeeria » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:03 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Pandeeria wrote:The Enlightenment drastically sped up scientific progress so you can live the life you have today, rather than being a fucking always-hungry peasant in some fiefdom.
Oh come now. Even as a fan of the Enlightenment, pre-enlightenment society wasn't THAT broken. It was pretty broken, but for the most part they managed to feed themselves in most cases.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:03 pm

by Conserative Morality » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:03 pm

by Pandeeria » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:04 pm
Even Less of Mackonia wrote:Pandeeria wrote:
The Enlightenment drastically sped up scientific progress so you can live the life you have today, rather than being a fucking always-hungry peasant in some fiefdom.
because belief in natural rights and equality are essential to 'scientific progress'.
Scientific progress was already happening and had been happening for some time in Europe, it was the science which enabled the bollocks of the Enlightenment, not the other way around.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by Germanic Templars » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:04 pm

by Even Less of Mackonia » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:05 pm
Pandeeria wrote:Even Less of Mackonia wrote:
because belief in natural rights and equality are essential to 'scientific progress'.
Scientific progress was already happening and had been happening for some time in Europe, it was the science which enabled the bollocks of the Enlightenment, not the other way around.
If people want to content themselves with foolish things like kings and divine rights and feudalism, then so be it. It does not make them any more scientific than the actual established scientific method, which has it's roots of concept dating all the way back to the Enlightenment.

by The Princes of the Universe » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:06 pm

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Based Illinois, Corporate Collective Salvation, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement