Don't be afraid to call the goyim what they are, goy
Advertisement
by Grand Britannia » Tue Nov 15, 2016 9:58 am
by The East Marches » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:05 am
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:Foymount wrote:Ooh.
What does this thread think about foreign policy?
I for one advocate for bombing the living daylights out of the Axis of Evil, and giving them an utter bollocking.
I do not want to sound uncouth, crass, and impolite, but will you try to limit civilian casualties? If so, how do you intend on doing so?
by Spaceman Spliff » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:08 am
by The East Marches » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:11 am
by Spaceman Spliff » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:14 am
The East Marches wrote:Spaceman Spliff wrote:How long did that take you?
Must have been a little bit.
And is "terror bombing" because you're a sadist or because you actually care about winning?
Not you personally, TEM.
You know, I've gotten so good at that type of post that it takes me about 2 minutes now. My personally policy is choose the most effective option. If "dehousing" as the British used to say, is generally agreed upon to be the best option, then "dehousing" it is. I have no particular preference for or against it. That was fun to type out though.
by The East Marches » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:16 am
Spaceman Spliff wrote:The East Marches wrote:
You know, I've gotten so good at that type of post that it takes me about 2 minutes now. My personally policy is choose the most effective option. If "dehousing" as the British used to say, is generally agreed upon to be the best option, then "dehousing" it is. I have no particular preference for or against it. That was fun to type out though.
Ah, okay. It probably would have taken me five, I don't do much url-inputting. Fair enough. There generally aren't many rules in war except to win.
by Spaceman Spliff » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:18 am
The East Marches wrote:Spaceman Spliff wrote:Ah, okay. It probably would have taken me five, I don't do much url-inputting. Fair enough. There generally aren't many rules in war except to win.
Well, you want to know the easiest way to do it, do the "url" thing to all the parts of the post. Then you use arrow key down to where the "=" is. hit "equal" then control + v. Shitposting made ez pz.
by Jochizyd Republic » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:34 am
by The Liberated Territories » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:52 am
by Camaalbakrius » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:58 am
by Lady Scylla » Tue Nov 15, 2016 10:59 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:RWDT: What do you guys think of Herbert Spencer
by Spaceman Spliff » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:09 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:RWDT: What do you guys think of Herbert Spencer
by United Marxist Nations » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:10 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:RWDT: What do you guys think of Herbert Spencer
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Intermountain States » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:15 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:RWDT: What do you guys think of Herbert Spencer
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I'm a third party voter. Trust me when I say this: Not even a lifetime supply of tacos could convince me to vote for either Hillary or Trump. I suspect I'm not the only third party voter who feels that way. I cost Hillary nothing. I cost Trump nothing. If I didn't vote for third party, I would have written in 'Batman'.
If you try to blame me, I will laugh in your face. I'm glad she lost. I got half my wish. :)
by Serenvia » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:22 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:RWDT: What do you guys think of Herbert Spencer
by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:34 am
by Grand Britannia » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:37 am
by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:38 am
Grand Britannia wrote:social darwinisn is ok when applied to international politics
by Serenvia » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:43 am
Grand Britannia wrote:social darwinisn is ok when applied to international politics
by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:45 am
Serenvia wrote:Grand Britannia wrote:social darwinisn is ok when applied to international politicsEh. Gets a pass. Social darwinism is a general no no for like, society on a domestic level. Business wise also gets a pass.The United Colonies of Earth wrote:String it up and tear it to pieces, then burn it
v good i approve
by Jochizyd Republic » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:48 am
The Liberated Territories wrote:RWDT: What do you guys think of Herbert Spencer
by Serenvia » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:48 am
by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:50 am
by Conscentia » Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:54 am
Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Click Ests Vimgalevytopia, Eurocom, Galactic Powers, Giandan, Hypron, Ineva, Unclear
Advertisement