What's your MBTI type?

[Roelandia]

So, as the subject header says, what's your Myers-Briggs personality type indicator type?

If you're not sure but want to know, you can take the test here:
https://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test

My mbti type is INFP (introverted intuitive feeling percieving)

[Engleberg]

ISTJ

Fun guy here

[Herador]

I took one in college and I think it was INJP or some shut-in shit. Guess there's something to it since all the careers it offered up were things I was interested in. Screw it though, I'll take it again, things have changed since then.

E: So I think I took the wrong test because it said I'm a Dragon type.

I identify as a Dragonite now.

[Urran]

INFP

[Quokkastan]

Haven't Myers-Briggs tests repeatedly been discredited? That they basically only confirm what the tester already thinks?

[Roelandia]

Haven't Myers-Briggs tests repeatedly been discredited? That they basically only confirm what the tester already thinks?

They have a validity problem yes but I don't think you should discount mbti as a whole though. I see it as a handy guideline for yourself and your place in the world.

But discussing the validity of MBTI is not the subject of this thread

[Dumb Ideologies]

I can't tell you because my type is resistant to spooky discredited bullshit.

[Roelandia]

I took one in college and I think it was INJP or some shut-in shit. Guess there's something to it since all the careers it offered up were things I was interested in. Screw it though, I'll take it again, things have changed since then.

INJP doesn't exist as a type though but ok. And yes, I also think there's something to it, experience has thought me that (up to a point). It shouldn't be seen as dogmatic though but more as a general guideline that's somewhat flexible. Combine MBTI with enneagram and socionics and you get a clearer picture of yourself (a more in depth "guideline" so to speak) I find this all really interesting.

[Roelandia]

I can't tell you because my type is resistant to spooky discredited bullshit.

Again, not the point of the thread. If you don't think it's valid, ok, no hard feeling but please go post somewhere else.

[Quokkastan]

Haven't Myers-Briggs tests repeatedly been discredited? That they basically only confirm what the tester already thinks?

They have a validity problem yes but I don't think you should discount mbti as a whole though. I see it as a handy guideline for yourself and your place in the world.

But discussing the validity of MBTI is not the subject of this thread

I think you missed the part where it tells you exactly what you expect to hear.

So it's not, "a handy guideline for yourself and your place in the world." It's confirmation bias.

And a thread on Myers-Briggs types is exactly the place to discuss the validity of the Myers-Briggs test.

[New Hayesalia]

INTJ here, boys.

Livin that Monty Burns lifestyle y'know what I'm saying?

[Roelandia]

They have a validity problem yes but I don't think you should discount mbti as a whole though. I see it as a handy guideline for yourself and your place in the world.

But discussing the validity of MBTI is not the subject of this thread

I think you missed the part where it tells you exactly what you expect to hear.

So it's not, "a handy guideline for yourself and your place in the world." It's confirmation bias.

If you want to see it that way fine, I don't and that's my right.
But must I repeat that this isn't the point of the thread?
On another day, in another thread I'd happily debate this with you but not here.

[Lautrec-]

INTJ

Not sure if really good or really bad

[Quokkastan]

I think you missed the part where it tells you exactly what you expect to hear.

So it's not, "a handy guideline for yourself and your place in the world." It's confirmation bias.

If you want to see it that way fine, I don't and that's my right.
But must I repeat that this isn't the point of the thread?
On another day, in another thread I'd happily debate this with you but not here.

You're "pro: atheism" and yet you're taking this test on faith? That's a new kind of weird.

Yes, this is exactly the thread for this sort of discussion. Feel free to take it up with Moderation if you disagree.

[Freefall11111]

INTJ

Not sure if really good or really bad

It's meaningless, so neither.

[Thermodolia]

Oh look it's this again.

I'm a ESFJ not that it means anything.

[Roelandia]

If you want to see it that way fine, I don't and that's my right.
But must I repeat that this isn't the point of the thread?
On another day, in another thread I'd happily debate this with you but not here.

You're "pro: atheism" and yet you're taking this test on faith? That's a new kind of weird.

Yes, this is exactly the thread for this sort of discussion. Feel free to take it up with Moderation if you disagree.

So must I report you? That's weird. (I'd really prefer not to by the way so please just stop hijacking my thread already!)
And I'm not taking this on faith, I just haven't explained my view on this because I said I'm not discussing it here in this thread as you're hijacking it. (man you're stubborn!) So stop assuming things about me or my disposition.

[Lautrec-]

INTJ

Not sure if really good or really bad

It's meaningless, so neither.

You must be fun at parties

[Freefall11111]

It's meaningless, so neither.

You must be fun at parties

If your idea of parties consists of circlejerking over pseudo-science, I feel bad for everyone involved.

[ChicagoBoys]

ISTJ-A

Obviously, you have to be logical to be a white nationalist so that's an easy fit for me

[Gigaverse]

ENFP-A with 55% Extroversion, 66% Intuition, 57% Feeling, 75% Prospecting and 52% Assertiveness. Apparently 7% of "the population"... of whichever country of the world, I dunno.

On the Extro-/Introversion scale, however, I often define myself as an Introvert-leaning Ambivert - I think I'm quite comfy with this description.

[Ostroeuropa]

YOUR PERSONALITY TYPE IS:
COMMANDER (ENTJ-A)

Appears to have changed over the last few years.

85%
EXTRAVERTED

65%
INTUITIVE

88%
THINKING

54%
JUDGING

81%
ASSERTIVE

[Roelandia]

ENFP-A with 55% Extroversion, 66% Intuition, 57% Feeling, 75% Prospecting and 52% Assertiveness. Apparently 7% of "the population"... of whichever country of the world, I dunno.

On the Extro-/Introversion scale, however, I often define myself as an Introvert-leaning Ambivert - I think I'm quite comfy with this description.

Interesting... my type is apparently 4% of the population. (most of those percentages are from the USA I believe so I don't have a clear idea on that as I'm not American.)

Looking at your percentages you do float a little on the edges whereass I usaully have scores between 90 and 60% on all my functions. (I'm a turbulent by the way, I didn't list that in my first post).

[Ifreann]

O negative.

[Roelandia]

O negative.

Wrong typology, but funny.