NationStates

The Portland Territory wrote:boop

So guys, what do y'all think? After reading this, I thought it was enlightening

I was thinking more in terms of moronic than enlightening. Though perhaps it can mean something similar.

Did these people forget that W and the GOP crashed the economy 10 years ago with similar BS? I guess most of us can still remember the economic paradise created by W when he did what mr Moore is now suggesting we do again. Not just that, but the dimwit who wrote this actually says Trump knows how to pay the bills. Seriously? Did this guy just drop in from Mars or something?

Tired of these right wing economerrorists. Since when is population growth not the #1 factor determining economic growth?

Thermodolia wrote:

Valaran wrote:
It narrowed, but not sufficiently. Hence why I said Clinton needs a much greater lead than her current one in order to make GA competitive, and that's the opposite direction to where she has been going (until maybe yesterday).

What are you talking about Georgia is competitive. A 2 point lead in the polls is considered to be competitive.

Its a 5 point lead though.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/201 ... t/georgia/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... -5968.html

San Lumen wrote:

The Emerald Dawn wrote:They, by design, don't know the orders.

All they know is launch/don't launch.

That's the terrifying part of the American Nuclear Program, one person (POTUS) gets to choose. Everything else is just math.

They should refuse to launch.

After all, nuclear warfare is in itself an unlawful order. Nuclear warfare targets civilians by design. The first person to launch a nuclear weapon and trigger a nuclear exchange is worse than all the dictators and tyrants humanity has ever had combined.

But i guess the reality of disobeying an 'unlawful order' is a lot different than some here make it out to be.

Camicon wrote:

Galloism wrote:You would have reflexively surrendered in 1812?

*runs away*

If the Brits hadn't colonized North America, would the United States even exist? Or would North America be divvied up between a large former colony of France, Mexico, and a confederacy of First Nations?

Oh I thought you meant the brits just didn't colonize Canada, still colonized America.

Of course, if Canada had been a French colony instead of British, we would have had no cause to attack anyway.

Trumpostan wrote:

The Portland Territory wrote:boop

So guys, what do y'all think? After reading this, I thought it was enlightening

I was thinking more in terms of moronic than enlightening. Though perhaps it can mean something similar.

Did these people forget that W and the GOP crashed the economy 10 years ago with similar BS? I guess most of us can still remember the economic paradise created by W when he did what mr Moore is now suggesting we do again.

Tired of these right wing economerrorists. Since when is population growth not the #1 factor determining economic growth?

370 economists say "The Hell With Trump".

How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

She's been Secretary of State, Senator, First Lady and finally, President.

Hittanryan wrote:

Galloism wrote:You would have reflexively surrendered in 1812?

*runs away*

God damn it, a thousand years of successful military history, then you lose one World War against the strongest military power of its day and that's all anyone remembers.

I'm just giving France a little shit. It's fun.

The French resistance deserves significant credit in WW2, given they basically painted giant bullseyes on the things we needed to hit.

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

I hope she wins. I fear their will be violence by Trumps supporters against non whites.

The Emerald Dawn wrote:

Camicon wrote:Well, you know... Iraq...

They tried. Canada refused to join in that clusterfuck.

In the 2003 Iraq war, Canada did not get involve in sending troops to Iraq. However, El Salvador, Honduras and even Nicaragua sent soldiers.

Read this - http://www.reuters.com/article/us-salva ... 7820080119

Bret Baier admits bullshit reporting on a likely Clinton indictment. Fox News lies.

Imperial Union of America wrote:

San Lumen wrote:They should refuse to launch.

After all, nuclear warfare is in itself an unlawful order. Nuclear warfare targets civilians by design. The first person to launch a nuclear weapon and trigger a nuclear exchange is worse than all the dictators and tyrants humanity has ever had combined.

But i guess the reality of disobeying an 'unlawful order' is a lot different than some here make it out to be.

Have you ever served?

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

Breath a sigh of relief and move on with my life knowing that there will be incremental improvement in the world for the next four years.

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

A bottle of Jack Daniels.

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:Um, why does everyone think Trump will invade Canada? Is that just a joke or is there some basis to it?

Some guy said that if Trump decided to invade Canada that the u.s military would be obligated to follow his orders unquestionably. people pointed out that it was illegal, he ignored it. and it just became a running joke.

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

It was expected, in any case. Who knows how long she will be president, if she is elected.

San Lumen wrote:

The Emerald Dawn wrote:They, by design, don't know the orders.

All they know is launch/don't launch.

That's the terrifying part of the American Nuclear Program, one person (POTUS) gets to choose. Everything else is just math.

They should refuse to launch.

They don't know what they are launching at. All they know is to launch/not launch. For all they know it could be the Russians

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

She's been Secretary of State, Senator, First Lady and finally, President.

Momentary sigh of relief, followed by bracing for the next hyper-partisan stupidity to come out of the remnants of a once great political party.

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

She's been Secretary of State, Senator, First Lady and finally, President.

Take a long swig of the nearest alcohol (in relief), and intensify migration plans.

Geilinor wrote:Bret Baier admits bullshit reporting on a likely Clinton indictment. Fox News lies.

Too bad nobody voting for Trump will even know it happened, much less face the truth.

Imperial Union of America wrote:

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

It was expected, in any case. Who knows how long she will be president, if she is elected.

Four years, at least.

Imperial Union of America wrote:

Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:How will you all react if/when Clinton beats Trump?

It was expected, in any case. Who knows how long she will be president, if she is elected.

As in her chances of securing a reelection in 2020?

Lady Scylla wrote:

Imperial Union of America wrote:
After all, nuclear warfare is in itself an unlawful order. Nuclear warfare targets civilians by design. The first person to launch a nuclear weapon and trigger a nuclear exchange is worse than all the dictators and tyrants humanity has ever had combined.

But i guess the reality of disobeying an 'unlawful order' is a lot different than some here make it out to be.

Have you ever served?

Given the views i have expressed on this forum, i believe answering that question would be incredibly stupid on my part.

Thermodolia wrote:

San Lumen wrote:They should refuse to launch.

They don't know what they are launching at. All they know is to launch/not launch. For all they know it could be the Russians

refuse to launch no matter who is being targeted.

Galloism wrote:

Hittanryan wrote:God damn it, a thousand years of successful military history, then you lose one World War against the strongest military power of its day and that's all anyone remembers.

I'm just giving France a little shit. It's fun.

The French resistance deserves significant credit in WW2, given they basically painted giant bullseyes on the things we needed to hit.

Goddamn kids and their graffiti.

Valaran wrote:

Thermodolia wrote:What are you talking about Georgia is competitive. A 2 point lead in the polls is considered to be competitive.

Its a 5 point lead though.

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/201 ... t/georgia/
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... -5968.html

Current poll. https://mobile.twitter.com/LoriGearyWSB ... 5038499840