Or a lot of her other scandals.
Ah well, if she does win (which she likely will) then I can at least take comfort in knowing that her term will be plagued with scandals.
The Clintons and scandals go together like pees and carrots.
Advertisement

by Kravanica » Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:57 am

by The Emerald Dawn » Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:57 am


by Liriena » Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:57 am

| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Thermodolia » Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:58 am
Kravanica wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Though I'm pretty surprised that the democrats would be the ones to do that. I've always thought the republicans had the stranglehold on super patriotism
Well after all the shit they got at the convention for not having any American flags I guess they decided to switch it up.

by Cymrea » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:00 am
Kravanica wrote:The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster wrote:Well researched comedians, my friend.
Although, no matter what he found on the other scandals, there's still no excusing the damn Swiss File Transfer.
Or a lot of her other scandals.
Ah well, if she does win (which she likely will) then I can at least take comfort in knowing that her term will be plagued with scandals.
The Clintons and scandals go together like pees and carrots.

by Kravanica » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:01 am

by Thermodolia » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:01 am
Cymrea wrote:Kravanica wrote:Or a lot of her other scandals.
Ah well, if she does win (which she likely will) then I can at least take comfort in knowing that her term will be plagued with scandals.
The Clintons and scandals go together like pees and carrots.
A Trump term would be totally scandal-free.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:01 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
There's a lot of reasons, but unloyal citizens isn't the most popular one. It's a fringe notion.
Also "the Latins"... *cringe*
Listen, if the Romans want to try and conquer the US, they're going to have to get used to the fact that the Pope now owns the term "Rome".
They're the Latins now, get used to it.

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Kravanica » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:02 am
Cymrea wrote:Kravanica wrote:Or a lot of her other scandals.
Ah well, if she does win (which she likely will) then I can at least take comfort in knowing that her term will be plagued with scandals.
The Clintons and scandals go together like pees and carrots.
A Trump term would be totally scandal-free.

by Thermodolia » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:03 am

by Alvecia » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:05 am
Thermodolia wrote:Kravanica wrote:Pretty sure there weren't any at first.
Picture evidence says otherwise
http://www.snopes.com/flags-banned-at-dnc/

by Kravanica » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:05 am
Thermodolia wrote:Kravanica wrote:Pretty sure there weren't any at first.
Picture evidence says otherwise
http://www.snopes.com/flags-banned-at-dnc/

by Thermodolia » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:06 am


by Khadgar » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:07 am
Kravanica wrote:Cymrea wrote:A Trump term would be totally scandal-free.
Probably not. But I'm willing to bet it wouldn't be as many as a Clinton presidency.
Based on experiences with the Clintons, one can safely assume that they will continue their trend of enriching themselves at the expense of their country.

by Alvecia » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:08 am
Khadgar wrote:Kravanica wrote:Probably not. But I'm willing to bet it wouldn't be as many as a Clinton presidency.
Based on experiences with the Clintons, one can safely assume that they will continue their trend of enriching themselves at the expense of their country.
Fun thing about the Clintons, the most scandalous thing either one of them has ever been proven to do was to get a blowjob. Not for the lack of trying to pin everything since the death of Christ on them.
So they're either the best damned thieves in the history of the universe or they're innocent. Which is more probable?

by The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:10 am
Tsaraine wrote:Nazis aren't known for their smarts. You don't adhere to an ideology that got flattened under a T-34 in 1945 if you're full of sparks and opportunities in life.
Caelestiam wrote:...wait,
Are we seriously in a dick measuring contest over who has the right to declare law by virtue of the most innocent dead?
Sounds horrible and insensitive.
Proceed.

by Gauthier » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:10 am
Alvecia wrote:Khadgar wrote:
Fun thing about the Clintons, the most scandalous thing either one of them has ever been proven to do was to get a blowjob. Not for the lack of trying to pin everything since the death of Christ on them.
So they're either the best damned thieves in the history of the universe or they're innocent. Which is more probable?
It's probably because Hillary is literally the devil *nods*

by Kravanica » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:11 am
Khadgar wrote:Kravanica wrote:Probably not. But I'm willing to bet it wouldn't be as many as a Clinton presidency.
Based on experiences with the Clintons, one can safely assume that they will continue their trend of enriching themselves at the expense of their country.
Fun thing about the Clintons, the most scandalous thing either one of them has ever been proven to do was to get a blowjob. Not for the lack of trying to pin everything since the death of Christ on them.
So they're either the best damned thieves in the history of the universe or they're innocent. Which is more probable?

by Cymrea » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:12 am
Kravanica wrote:Cymrea wrote:A Trump term would be totally scandal-free.
Probably not. But I'm willing to bet it wouldn't be as many as a Clinton presidency.
Based on experiences with the Clintons, one can safely assume that they will continue their trend of enriching themselves at the expense of their country.

by Hurdergaryp » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:13 am
Alvecia wrote:Khadgar wrote:
Fun thing about the Clintons, the most scandalous thing either one of them has ever been proven to do was to get a blowjob. Not for the lack of trying to pin everything since the death of Christ on them.
So they're either the best damned thieves in the history of the universe or they're innocent. Which is more probable?
It's probably because Hillary is literally the devil *nods*

by The Holy Empire of the Spaghetti Monster » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:13 am
Cymrea wrote:Kravanica wrote:Probably not. But I'm willing to bet it wouldn't be as many as a Clinton presidency.
Based on experiences with the Clintons, one can safely assume that they will continue their trend of enriching themselves at the expense of their country.
I would take that bet. Clinton's detractors continue to whip the bones of the same two horses: Benghazi, and emails. Both were investigated, nothing came of them. But since the Republicans have nothing else to go on, it just keeps circling around, over and over while ignoring the facts. "Lock her up", they chant like a salivating torch-and-pitchfork mob - while remaining blithely ignorant of Trump's own pending indictments.
Trump, on the other hand, generates a scandal every time he opens his mouth. He's a walking, glow-in-the-dark scandal. And make no mistake, Trump does nothing that isn't intended for his direct and personal benefit.
Tsaraine wrote:Nazis aren't known for their smarts. You don't adhere to an ideology that got flattened under a T-34 in 1945 if you're full of sparks and opportunities in life.
Caelestiam wrote:...wait,
Are we seriously in a dick measuring contest over who has the right to declare law by virtue of the most innocent dead?
Sounds horrible and insensitive.
Proceed.

by Khadgar » Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:18 am
Kravanica wrote:Khadgar wrote:
Fun thing about the Clintons, the most scandalous thing either one of them has ever been proven to do was to get a blowjob. Not for the lack of trying to pin everything since the death of Christ on them.
So they're either the best damned thieves in the history of the universe or they're innocent. Which is more probable?
You mean like giving donors special access at the State Dept?
Or appointing donors to government positions?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Kenmoria, Riviere Renard, Tinhampton
Advertisement